Comparative differences of mitral valve‐in‐valve implantation: A new mitral bioprosthesis versus current mosaic and epic valves

Evaluate transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) valve‐in‐valve (VIV) outcomes in three different mitral bioprostheses (of comparable measured internal diameters) under stable hemodynamic and surgical conditions by bench, echocardiographic, computerized tomography (CT), and autopsy comparisons pre‐ and post‐valve implantation in a porcine model under matched controlled conditions.

[1]  M. Simonato.  Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement After Surgical Repair or Replacement: Comprehensive Mid-Term Evaluation of Valve-in-Valve and Valve-in-Ring Implantation from the VIVID Registry , 2020 .

[2]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Contemporary outcomes in reoperative mitral valve surgery , 2017, Heart.

[3]  G. Filippatos,et al.  Clinical Trial Design Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement: Part 2: Endpoint Definitions: A Consensus Document From the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Computed Tomography-based evaluation of porcine cardiac dimensions to assist in pre-study planning and optimized model selection for pre-clinical research , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Lloyd H. Michael,et al.  The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. , 2016, ILAR journal.

[6]  Bijoy K Khandheria,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Card , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Validating a prediction modeling tool for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  Comparison of a new bioprosthetic mitral valve to other commercially available devices under controlled conditions in a porcine model , 2021, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[9]  M. Guerrero,et al.  Transseptal transcatheter mitral valve‐in‐valve: A step by step guide from preprocedural planning to postprocedural care , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  R. Whistance,et al.  Outcome after redo-mitral valve replacement in adult patients: a 10-year single-centre experience. , 2012, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[11]  Jiaquan Zhu,et al.  A SWINE MODEL FOR LONG‐TERM EVALUATION OF PROSTHETIC HEART VALVES , 2007, ANZ journal of surgery.

[12]  I. Palacios,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Transseptal TMVR for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses: MITRAL Trial Valve-in-Valve Arm 1-Year Outcomes. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  A. Bavry,et al.  Transcatheter mitral valve‐in‐valve and valve‐in‐ring replacement: Lessons learned from bioprosthetic surgical valve failures , 2021, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[14]  M. Mack,et al.  One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve. , 2020, JAMA cardiology.

[15]  V. Hjortdal,et al.  A long-term porcine model for evaluation of prosthetic heart valves. , 2004, The heart surgery forum.

[16]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Characteristics of surgical prosthetic heart valves and problems around labeling: A document from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)-The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Valve Labelling Task Force. , 2019, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  V. Ferrans,et al.  Development and evaluation of a swine model to assess the preclinical safety of mechanical heart valves. , 2000, The Journal of heart valve disease.