Electronic Communities: Global Villages or Cyberbalkanization? (Best Theme Paper)

Information technology can link geographically separated people and help them locate interesting or compatible resources. Although these attributes have the potential to bridge gaps and unite communities, they also have the potential to fragment interaction and divide groups by leading people to spend more time on special interests and by screening out less preferred contact. This paper introduces precise measures of “balkanization” then develops a model of individual knowledge profiles and community affiliation. These factors suggest conditions under which improved access, search, and screening might either balkanize or integrate interaction. As IT capabilities continue to improve, policy choices we make could put us on more or less attractive paths.

[1]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Modeling the Performance of Organizational Structures , 1988, Oper. Res..

[2]  Janice I. DeGross,et al.  OF THE SEVENTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS December 16-18 , 1996 Cleveland , Ohio , 1996 .

[3]  Judith S. Donath,et al.  Visual Who: animating the affinities and activities of an electronic community , 1995, MULTIMEDIA '95.

[4]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Returns to science: computer networks in oceanography , 1993, CACM.

[5]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Information Technology and the Future of Cities , 1996 .

[6]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Communication Networks and the Rise of an Information Elite: Do Computers Help the Rich Get Richer? , 1995, ICIS.

[7]  A. Roth.  The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[10]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Communication at A Distance : The Influence of Print on Sociocultural Organization and Change , 1994 .

[11]  W A Wulf,et al.  The collaboratory opportunity. , 1993, Science.

[12]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[13]  P. Kline.  Models of man , 1986, Nature.

[14]  Marshall W. van Alstyne,et al.  The State of Network Organization: A Survey in Three Frameworks , 1997, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[15]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[16]  Marshall McLuhan,et al.  The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century , 1989 .

[17]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[18]  S. Boorman,et al.  Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[21]  S. Boorman,et al.  Social structure from multiple networks: I , 1976 .

[22]  George M. Wyner,et al.  Cowboys or Commanders: Does Information Technology Lead to Decentralization? , 1996, ICIS.

[23]  M. Kremer,et al.  The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development , 1993 .

[24]  T. Kuhn.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edition , 1970 .

[25]  Blake Ives,et al.  The Global Network Organization of the Future: Information Management Opportunities and Challenges , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..