The effect of ionic dissolution products of Ca–Sr–Na–Zn–Si bioactive glass on in vitro cytocompatibility

Many commercial bone grafts cannot regenerate healthy bone in place of diseased bone. Bioactive glasses have received much attention in this regard due to the ability of their ionic dissolution products to promote cell proliferation, cell differentiation and activate gene expression. Through the incorporation of certain ions, bioactive glasses can become therapeutic for specific pathological situations. Calcium–strontium–sodium–zinc–silicate glass bone grafts have been shown to release therapeutic levels of zinc and strontium, however the in vitro compatibility of these materials is yet to be reported. In this study, the in vitro cytocompatibility of three different calcium–strontium–sodium–zinc–silicate glasses was examined as a function of their ion release profiles, using Novabone® bioglass as a commercial comparison. Experimental compositions were shown to release Si4+ ranging from 1 to 81 ppm over 30 days; comparable or enhanced release in comparison to Novabone. The maximum Ca2+ release detected for experimental compositions was 9.1 ppm, below that reported to stimulate osteoblasts. Sr2+ release was within known therapeutic ranges, and Zn2+ release ranged from 0.5 to 1.4 ppm, below reported cytotoxic levels. All examined glass compositions show equivalent or enhanced in vitro compatibility in comparison to Novabone. Cells exposed to BT112 ionic products showed enhanced cell viabilities indicating cell proliferation was induced. The ion release profiles suggest this effect was due to a synergistic interaction between certain combinations and concentrations of ions. Overall, results indicate that the calcium–strontium–sodium–zinc–silicate glass compositions show equivalent or even enhanced in vitro compatibility compared to Novabone®.

[1]  S. Moane,et al.  The effect of composition on ion release from Ca–Sr–Na–Zn–Si glass bone grafts , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[2]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bioglass ®45S5 Stimulates Osteoblast Turnover and Enhances Bone Formation In Vitro: Implications and Applications for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[3]  I. Brook,et al.  Preliminary investigation of novel bone graft substitutes based on strontium–calcium–zinc–silicate glasses , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[4]  Dario Ghigo,et al.  Cytotoxicity of zinc-containing bioactive glasses in contact with human osteoblasts. , 2007, Chemico-biological interactions.

[5]  S. Hesaraki,et al.  The effect of Sr concentration on bioactivity and biocompatibility of sol-gel derived glasses based on CaO-SrO-SiO2-P2O5 quaternary system , 2010 .

[6]  G. Jell,et al.  Gene activation by bioactive glasses , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[7]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Genetic design of bioactive glass , 2009 .

[8]  S. Adami Protelos: nonvertebral and hip antifracture efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis. , 2006, Bone.

[9]  J. Polak,et al.  Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[10]  P. Hatton,et al.  Influence of sodium oxide content on bioactive glass properties , 1999, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[11]  Hala Zreiqat,et al.  The effect of strontium incorporation into CaSiO3 ceramics on their physical and biological properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[12]  W. R. Moore,et al.  Synthetic bone graft substitutes , 2001, ANZ journal of surgery.

[13]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic , 1991 .

[14]  P. Ammann Strontium ranelate: a physiological approach for an improved bone quality. , 2006, Bone.

[15]  Tadashi Kokubo,et al.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? , 2006, Biomaterials.

[16]  M. Alizadeh,et al.  Physico-chemical and in vitro biological evaluation of strontium/calcium silicophosphate glass , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[17]  J. Polak,et al.  Dose- and time-dependent effect of bioactive gel-glass ionic-dissolution products on human fetal osteoblast-specific gene expression. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[18]  L L Hench,et al.  Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass 45S5 dissolution. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  Jiang Chang,et al.  In vitro bioactivity of novel tricalcium silicate ceramics , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[20]  B. Love,et al.  Effect of soluble zinc on differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[21]  I. Foster Cancer: A cell cycle defect , 2008 .

[22]  B. Riggs,et al.  Zeolite a increases proliferation, differentiation, and transforming growth factor β production in normal adult human osteoblast‐like cells in vitro , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  D. Zaffe,et al.  In vitro and in vivo behaviour of zinc-doped phosphosilicate glasses. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  F. Saltel,et al.  Dual effect of strontium ranelate: stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and inhibition of osteoclast formation and resorption in vitro. , 2008, Bone.

[25]  Ling-Ling Zhu,et al.  Induction of a program gene expression during osteoblast differentiation with strontium ranelate. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.