Automated Monte Carlo Simulation of Proton Therapy Treatment Plans

Simulations of clinical proton radiotherapy treatment plans using general purpose Monte Carlo codes have been proven to be a valuable tool for basic research and clinical studies. They have been used to benchmark dose calculation methods, to study radiobiological effects, and to develop new technologies such as in vivo range verification methods. Advancements in the availability of computational power have made it feasible to perform such simulations on large sets of patient data, resulting in a need for automated and consistent simulations. A framework called MCAUTO was developed for this purpose. Both passive scattering and pencil beam scanning delivery are supported. The code handles the data exchange between the treatment planning system and the Monte Carlo system, which requires not only transfer of plan and imaging information but also translation of institutional procedures, such as output factor definitions. Simulations are performed on a high-performance computing infrastructure. The simulation methods were designed to use the full capabilities of Monte Carlo physics models, while also ensuring consistency in the approximations that are common to both pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose calculations. Although some methods need to be tailored to institutional planning systems and procedures, the described procedures show a general road map that can be easily translated to other systems.

[1]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Geometrical splitting technique to improve the computational efficiency in Monte Carlo calculations for proton therapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[2]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  The prediction of output factors for spread-out proton Bragg peak fields in clinical practice , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  C Nauraye,et al.  Monte Carlo modelling of the treatment line of the Proton Therapy Center in Orsay , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  H Paganetti,et al.  Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  S Agosteo,et al.  Secondary neutron and photon dose in proton therapy. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Quantification of proton dose calculation accuracy in the lung. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Uncertainties and correction methods when modeling passive scattering proton therapy treatment heads with Monte Carlo , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  H. Paganetti Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Tsukasa Aso,et al.  Geant4-based particle therapy simulation framework for verification of dose distributions in proton therapy facilities , 2014 .

[10]  H. Paganetti,et al.  Physics Settings for Using the Geant4 Toolkit in Proton Therapy , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  K Parodi,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations to support start-up and treatment planning of scanned proton and carbon ion therapy at a synchrotron-based facility , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  M Goitein,et al.  A pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  I Buvat,et al.  Distributions of secondary particles in proton and carbon-ion therapy: a comparison between GATE/Geant4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Joseph F. Janni,et al.  Energy loss, range, path length, time-of-flight, straggling, multiple scattering, and nuclear interaction probability , 1982 .

[15]  Chris Beltran,et al.  Proton therapy dose distribution comparison between Monte Carlo and a treatment planning system for pediatric patients with ependymoma. , 2012, Medical physics.

[16]  H. Kooy,et al.  Monte Carlo study of the potential reduction in out-of-field dose using a patient-specific aperture in pencil beam scanning proton therapy , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  S. Incerti,et al.  Geant4 developments and applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  J Schuemann,et al.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  GPU-based fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for proton therapy , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  H Paganetti,et al.  Efficient voxel navigation for proton therapy dose calculation in TOPAS and Geant4 , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Dose to water versus dose to medium in proton beam therapy , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  M. Fippel,et al.  A Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for proton therapy. , 2004, Medical physics.

[23]  H Paganetti,et al.  A modular method to handle multiple time-dependent quantities in Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Anton Lechner,et al.  Physics-Related Epistemic Uncertainties in Proton Depth Dose Simulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[25]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  D Dauvergne,et al.  Assessment and improvements of Geant4 hadronic models in the context of prompt-gamma hadrontherapy monitoring , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  H Paganetti,et al.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications. , 2012, Medical physics.

[28]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Multiple Coulomb scattering of 160 MeV protons , 1993 .

[29]  Joao Seco,et al.  Simulation of prompt gamma-ray emission during proton radiotherapy , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  H Paganetti,et al.  Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[31]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  M Engelsman,et al.  Commissioning a passive-scattering proton therapy nozzle for accurate SOBP delivery. , 2009, Medical physics.

[33]  S Dowdell,et al.  Interplay effects in proton scanning for lung: a 4D Monte Carlo study assessing the impact of tumor and beam delivery parameters , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Hanne M Kooy,et al.  A case study in proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  Joao Seco,et al.  Dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy for chordoma patients with titanium implants. , 2013, Medical physics.

[36]  David Craft,et al.  Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  A. Lomax,et al.  Characterizing a proton beam scanning system for Monte Carlo dose calculation in patients , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  L Grevillot,et al.  A Monte Carlo pencil beam scanning model for proton treatment plan simulation using GATE/GEANT4 , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations for absolute dosimetry to determine machine outputs for proton therapy fields , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Joao Seco,et al.  Proton range verification through prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  K Parodi,et al.  Integration and evaluation of automated Monte Carlo simulations in the clinical practice of scanned proton and carbon ion beam therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.