Accurate compensation method for probe pre-travel errors in on-machine inspections

On-machine inspection (OMI) systems have been widely used for the automatic setting of workpieces and the determination of the kinematic errors of a machine tool. Touch-trigger probes are commonly used in OMI systems due to their high reliability and low cost. However, the associated pre-travel error, which is inherent by nature, often severely affects the measurement accuracy and must be compensated during the measuring process in order to ensure the required measurement precision. This paper proposes a compensation method for probe errors using a 3D error map. To construct the 3D error map of the probe, a weighted least squares (WLS) method based on the probe’s mechanical model was first employed to accurately fit the reference sphere center; subsequently, the errors of the calibrated directions could be obtained. Finally, the bicubic Coons patch (BCP) interpolation method was used to calculate the errors of the uncalibrated directions. To validate the proposed method, calibration tests were conducted on an OMI system mounted with a strain gauge probe. The compensation results indicated an increase of 57.40% in the accuracy compared to that of the existing method.

[1]  Adam Wozniak,et al.  Wireless communication influence on CNC machine tool probe metrological parameters , 2016 .

[2]  Sofiane Achiche,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of coordinate measuring machines probing accuracy and settings using fuzzy knowledge bases: Application to TP6 and TP200 triggering probes , 2011, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[3]  Yin-Lin Shen,et al.  Pretravel compensation for vertically oriented touch-trigger probes with straight styli , 1997 .

[4]  Chien-Sheng Liu,et al.  Identification and compensation of position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and three spheres , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[5]  J. R. RenéMayer,et al.  3D characterisation, modelling and compensation of the pre-travel of a kinematic touch trigger probe , 1996 .

[6]  Marek Dobosz,et al.  Metrological feasibilities of CMM touch trigger probes Part II: Experimental verification of the 3D theoretical model of probe pretravel , 2003 .

[7]  J. Sładek,et al.  Evaluation of coordinate measurement uncertainty with use of virtual machine model based on Monte Carlo method , 2012 .

[8]  Gerald Farin.  The shape of surfaces , 1988 .

[9]  J Williamson.  The Shape of Surfaces , 1988 .

[10]  Yin-Lin Shen,et al.  Modelling of pretravel for touch trigger probes on indexable probe heads on coordinate measuring machines , 1997 .

[11]  Adam Wozniak,et al.  Mechanical model of errors of probes for numerical controlled machine tools , 2016 .

[12]  Xiangdong Zhou,et al.  Identification of location errors by a touch-trigger probe on five-axis machine tools with a tilting head , 2015 .

[13]  S. Achiche,et al.  3D CMM strain-gauge triggering probe error characteristics modeling using fuzzy logic , 2008, NAFIPS 2008 - 2008 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society.

[14]  Nuodi Huang,et al.  Identification of geometric errors of rotary axes on 5-axis machine tools by on-machine measurement , 2016 .

[15]  Marek Dobosz,et al.  Metrological feasibilities of CMM touch trigger probes. Part I: 3D theoretical model of probe pretravel , 2003 .

[16]  J. R. R. Mayer,et al.  Calibration of the cutting process and compensation of the compliance error by using on-machine probing , 2015 .

[17]  Yin-Lin Shen,et al.  Pretravel compensation for horizontally oriented touch trigger probes with straight styli , 1999 .

[18]  Chien-Sheng Liu,et al.  Identification and verification of location errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and a sphere , 2018, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[19]  Hui Yang,et al.  Identification and compensation of 11 position-independent geometric errors on five-axis machine tools with a tilting head , 2018 .

[20]  Michał Jankowski,et al.  Machine tool probes testing using a moving inner hemispherical master artefact , 2014 .

[21]  A. Woźniak.  Simple method of 3D error compensation of triggering probes of coordinate measuring machine , 2006 .

[22]  Nuodi Huang,et al.  Error compensation for machining of large thin-walled part with sculptured surface based on on-machine measurement , 2018 .