Experimental analysis of microcogenerators based on different prime movers

Abstract The European Union recently established an ambitious target by 2020 that consists of increasing the utilization of renewable energy up to 20%, reducing its overall pollutant emissions by at least 20%, and achieving a primary energy saving of 20% compared to reported 1990 levels. This aim can only be realized with strong effort in different sectors, such as residential, commercial, industry, tertiary, transportation. In particular in the European Union, a remarkable contribution to energy consumption and CO2 emissions is concentrated in residential and commercial sector. The introduction of more efficient technologies in these sectors could help in achieving the results expected by 2020. An option is given by cogeneration, defined as the combined “production” of electric and/or mechanical and thermal energy starting from single energy source. This technology could be considered one of the first elements to save primary energy, to avoid network losses and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In particular, this article focuses on the microcogeneration (electric power ≤ 15 kW), which represents a valid and interesting application for residential and light commercial users. The energy, economic and environmental implications due to the use of small scale cogeneration systems were reported, by means of an experimental research activity performed by the authors and other researchers.

[1]  Roger G. Marchand,et al.  Micro-generation technology assessment for housing technology , 2004 .

[2]  Maurizio Sasso,et al.  Field test of a small-size gas engine driven heat pump in an office application: first results , 1995 .

[3]  D Mertens,et al.  Micro-CHP systems for residential applications , 2006 .

[4]  Aie Energy Efficiency Indicators for Public Electricity Production from Fossil Fuels , 2009 .

[5]  D. G. Thombare,et al.  TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE STIRLING CYCLE ENGINES , 2008 .

[6]  Peter Tzscheutschler,et al.  Performance of Residential Cogeneration Systems in Germany. A Report of Subtask C of FC+COGEN-SIM The Simulation of Building-Integrated Fuel Cell and Other Cogeneration Systems. Annex 42 of the International Energy Agency Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems Programme , 2008 .

[7]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Experimental analysis of micro-cogeneration units based on reciprocating internal combustion engine , 2006 .

[8]  Igor Bulatov,et al.  MicroCHP: Overview of selected technologies, products and field test results , 2008 .

[9]  Alain Ferriere,et al.  Thermal model of a dish/Stirling systems , 2009 .

[10]  Ian Paul Knight,et al.  Residential cogeneration systems: A review of the current technologies. A report of subtask A of FC+COGEN-SIM: The simulation of building-integrated fuel cell and other cogeneration systems , 2005 .

[11]  Alex Ferguson,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Residential Cogeneration Devices and Calibration of Annex 42 Models : A Report of Subtask B of FC+COGEN-SIM The Simulation of Building-Integrated Fuel Cell and Other Cogeneration Systems , 2007 .

[12]  Bruno Peuportier,et al.  Experimental characterization, modeling and simulation of a wood pellet micro-combined heat and power unit used as a heat source for a residential building , 2010 .

[13]  Hongbo Ren,et al.  Economic and environmental evaluation of micro CHP systems with different operating modes for residential buildings in Japan , 2010 .

[14]  Günter R. Simader,et al.  Micro CHP systems: state-of-the-art , 2006 .

[15]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  The evaluation of small cogeneration for residential heating , 2002 .

[16]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  On policy instruments for support of micro combined heat and power , 2008 .

[17]  Peter Tzscheutschler,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Small Scale Cogenerators Based on Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine , 2010 .

[18]  Bernd Thomas,et al.  Benchmark testing of Micro-CHP units , 2008 .