Productivity developments in European agriculture: Relations to and opportunities for biomass production

This paper discusses if, how fast and to what maximum yield improvements can be realized in Europe in the coming decades and what the opportunities and relations are to biomass production. The starting point for the analysis is the historic context of developments in European agriculture over the past five decades. Historic developments in European crop and animal protein productivity between 1961 and 2007 show an average mean annual growth rate of 1.6%. In relative terms developments are slower on average in the Netherlands and France at 1.0%Â y-1 than in Poland and Ukraine (USSR) at 2.2%Â y-1. In absolute figures, however, growth has been considerable in WEC and modest in the CEEC. Yield trends further show that significant yield changes can be realized over a short period of time. Positive growth rates of 3-5%Â y-1 were reached in several countries and for several crops in several decades. In Eastern European countries during their transition in the 1990s, negative growth rates as low as -7%Â y-1 occurred. Outcomes suggest that productivity levels can be actively steered rather than being just the result of autonomous developments. Current yield gaps differ greatly between Western Europe (France

[1]  A. Faaij,et al.  Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios , 2005 .

[2]  The French economy , 1982 .

[3]  D. Turnock.  Agriculture in Eastern Europe: Communism, the transition and the future , 1996 .

[4]  Wojciech M. Budzianowski,et al.  Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs , 2012 .

[5]  A. Faaij,et al.  A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 , 2007 .

[6]  Csaba Csaki,et al.  Agricultural reforms in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union , 2000 .

[7]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part I: Land productivity potentials. , 2010 .

[8]  C.J.A.M. de Bont,et al.  Agrarische structuur, trends en beleid: ontwikkelingen in Nederland vanaf 1950 , 2008 .

[9]  T Wiesenthal,et al.  How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment , 2006 .

[10]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: I. Estimating changes in crop productivity , 2005 .

[11]  R. Giovarelli,et al.  Land reform in Eastern Europe. Western CIS, Transcaucuses, Balkans, and EU Accession Countries , 2001 .

[12]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part II: Land use scenarios , 2010 .

[13]  D. Sedik.  A Note on Soviet Per Capita Meat Consumption , 1993 .

[14]  Jan Pawlak.  Farm Machinery Market in the Second Half of the XX Century , 2002 .

[15]  A. van den Brink.  Structuur in beweging : het landbouwstructuurbeleid in Nederland 1945 - 1985 , 1990 .

[16]  V. Ruttan,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Agricultural Productivity Trends in Centrally Planned Countries , 1986 .

[17]  Asad Alam,et al.  Unleashing prosperity : productivity growth in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union , 2008 .

[18]  J. Lubroth,et al.  The work of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and transboundary animal diseases in a globalised world , 2011 .

[19]  T. Carter,et al.  Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: II. Projecting changes in cropland and grassland , 2005 .

[20]  Supawat Rungsuriyawiboon,et al.  Agricultural productivity growth in the European Union and transition countries [Produktivitätsentwicklung in der Landwirtschaft in der Europaischen Union und in den Transformationsländern] , 2006 .

[21]  André Faaij,et al.  Biomass production potentials in Central and Eastern Europe under different scenarios , 2007 .

[22]  J. Goldemberg.  Leapfrog energy technologies , 1998 .

[23]  A. Åslund.  How Ukraine became a market economy and democracy , 2009 .

[24]  P. Paarlberg,et al.  Livestock Sectors In The Economies Of Eastern Europe And The Former Soviet Union; Transition From Plan To Market And The Road Ahead , 2002 .

[25]  S. Osborne,et al.  AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE: BUILDING ON A DECADE OF REFORM , 2002 .

[26]  Ian McCallum,et al.  Global Supply of Biomass for Energy and Carbon Sequestration from Afforestation/Reforestation Activities , 2006 .

[27]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Scenar 2020 : scenario study on agriculture and the rural world , 2007 .

[28]  J. Swinnen,et al.  Institutional Reform and Labor Reallocation During Transition: Theory Evidence From Polish Agriculture , 2002 .

[29]  Giovanni Anania,et al.  Agricultural policy reform and the WTO : where are we heading? , 2004 .

[30]  Johan F.M. Swinnen,et al.  Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe's Transition Economies , 2008 .

[31]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach , 2004 .

[32]  A. Faaij,et al.  Bioenergy revisited: Key factors in global potentials of bioenergy , 2010 .

[33]  Naar een efficiënter milieubeleid: een maatschappelijk-economische analyse van vier hardnekkige milieuproblemen , 2000 .

[34]  A. Faaij,et al.  European biomass resource potential and costs , 2010 .

[35]  B. Eickhout,et al.  Can Biofuels be Sustainable in 2020? An Assessment of the Obligatory Target of 10% in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[36]  Prem S. Bindraban,et al.  Can biofuels be sustainable by 2020? An assessment for an obligatory blending target of 10% in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[37]  C. N. Hodges,et al.  Radically Rethinking Agriculture for the 21st Century , 2010, Science.

[38]  Richard Nehring,et al.  Convergence of Productivity: An Analysis of the Catch-up Hypothesis within a Panel of States , 2004 .

[39]  Bin Zhang.  Total Factor Productivity of Grain Production in the Former Soviet Union , 1997 .

[40]  C. Arnade,et al.  A Joint Livestock-Crop Multi-factor Relative Productivity Approach , 2003 .