The Evaluation of Sensors' Reliability and Their Tuning for Multisensor Data Fusion within the Transferable Belief Model

We develop a method to evaluate the reliability of a sensor in a classification task when the uncertainty is represented by belief functions as understood in the transferable belief model. This reliability is represented by a discounting factor that minimizes the distance between the pignistic probabilities computed from the discounted beliefs and the actual values of the data in a learning set. We then describe a method to tune the discounting factors of several sensors when their reports are merged in order to reach an aggregated report. They are computed so that together they minimize the distance between the pignistic probabilities computed from the combined discounted belief functions and the actual values of the data in a learning set. The first method produces the reliability of a sensor considered alone. The second method considers a set of sensors, and weights each of them so that together they produce the best predictor.

[1]  Thierry Denoeux,et al.  A k-nearest neighbor classification rule based on Dempster-Shafer theory , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[3]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Data association in multi‐target detection using the transferable belief model , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[4]  Thierry Denoeux,et al.  An evidence-theoretic k-NN rule with parameter optimization , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[5]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Khaled Mellouli,et al.  Classification with Belief Decision Trees , 2000, AIMSA.

[7]  P. Smets Application of the transferable belief model to diagnostic problems , 1998 .

[8]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  The combination of evidence , 1986, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[10]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The transferable belief model for expert judgements and reliability problems , 1992 .

[11]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model for Quantified Belief Representation , 1998 .

[12]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems: volume 2: reasoning with actual and potential contradictions , 1998 .

[13]  David Lee Coping with Discontinuities in Computer Vision: Their Detection, Classification, and Measurement , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  James Llinas,et al.  Multisensor Data Fusion , 1990 .

[15]  David A. Bell,et al.  Discounting and Combination Operations in Evidential Reasoning , 1993, UAI.

[16]  Xianoning Ling,et al.  Combining opinions form several experts , 1989, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[17]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Practical Uses of Belief Functions , 1999, UAI.