Luminex Crossmatch in kidney transplantation

The introduction of the Luminex Crossmatch assay (LumXm) which uses Luminex bead technology, consists of extracting the donor's Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) molecules from their lymphocytes, and binding them to fluorescent beads that are put in contact with recipient's serum. HLA donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) are detected using a fluorescent conjugate. The goal of our study is to determine the benefits of using LumXm in a renal transplantation algorithm. We tested 78 recipients' sera using the LumXm, and the results were compared with the Luminex single antigen bead assay (SAB) for all sera, as well as the Flow Cytometry Crossmatch (FCXM) for 46 sera. We compared our results with those of SAB using 3 cutoffs, the first being the manufacturer's criteria where sensitivity and specificity were at 62.5% and 91.3% respectively for HLA class 1, and 88.5% and 50.0% respectively for HLA class 2. When using the third cutoff criteria (≥2 Adjusted values + MFI [Mean fluorescence intensity] >500 + Neg MFI < 500), the sensitivity increased to 69.0% for HLA class 1 and decreased to 84.0% for HLA class 2, while the specificity increased for HLA class 1 and 2. When comparing with FCXM, the 3 assays agreed in 55.8% of results for class 1 and 2 alike. However, major discrepancies were found for two groups in HLA class 1 and one in HLA class 2. The LumXm when used with other techniques to overcome its' weak points, can provide an interesting insight into the patient's HLA–DSA profile.

[1]  A. Pande,et al.  Significance of Luminex-crossmatch assay and its mean fluorescence intensity - a retrospective observation in 380 renal transplant cases. , 2022, Polski przeglad chirurgiczny.

[2]  A. Pande,et al.  Renal transplantation in HLA sensitized patients: Traversing the immunological barrier , 2019, Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.

[3]  Mishra Mahendra Narain,et al.  Luminex Crossmatch for Pre-Transplant Workup of Renal Transplants - 30 Months Experience from Indian Subcontinent , 2019, International Journal of Transplantation Research and Medicine.

[4]  T. Jaatinen,et al.  Donor-specific HLA antibodies in predicting crossmatch outcome: Comparison of three different laboratory techniques. , 2017, Transplant immunology.

[5]  D. Daniel,et al.  Correlation of Pretransplant Donor-specific Antibody Assay Using Luminex Crossmatch with Graft Outcome in Renal Transplant Patients , 2017, Indian journal of nephrology.

[6]  N. Prasad,et al.  Luminex Solid-Phase Crossmatch for De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies in Living-Donor Related Transplants. , 2017, Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation.

[7]  A. Valson,et al.  Nonspecific positivity on the Luminex crossmatch assay for anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies due to antibodies directed against the antibody coated beads , 2016, Indian journal of nephrology.

[8]  P. Wallace,et al.  Flow Cytometry and Solid Organ Transplantation: A Perfect Match , 2014, Immunological investigations.

[9]  C. Presne,et al.  Correlation between Luminex donor-specific crossmatches and levels of donor-specific antibodies in pretransplantation screening. , 2013, Tissue antigens.

[10]  A. Skoura,et al.  Comparative performance evaluation of a donor-specific bead-based crossmatch technique for the detection of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in heart transplantation. , 2013, Transplantation proceedings.

[11]  K. Huh,et al.  Renal transplantation in sensitized recipients with positive luminex and negative CDC (complement‐dependent cytotoxicity) crossmatches , 2012, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[12]  C. Napoli,et al.  Luminex and antibody detection in kidney transplantation , 2012, Clinical and Experimental Nephrology.

[13]  D. Roelen,et al.  Challenging the golden standard in defining donor-specific antibodies: does the solid phase assay meet the expectations? , 2011, Tissue antigens.

[14]  M. J. Acevedo,et al.  Donor-specific antibody detection: comparison of single antigen assay and Luminex crossmatches. , 2010, Tissue antigens.

[15]  M. Christiaans,et al.  Luminex donor-specific crossmatches. , 2008, Tissue antigens.

[16]  J. Scornik Detection of alloantibodies by flow cytometry: relevance to clinical transplantation. , 1995, Cytometry.

[17]  P. Russell,et al.  Use of an antiglobulin-ATG reagent for detection of low levels of alloantibody-improvement of allograft survival in presensitized recipients. , 1978, Transplantation proceedings.

[18]  P. Terasaki,et al.  Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. , 1969, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  O. Fjeldborg,et al.  Hyperacute rejection of kidney allografts, associated with pre-existing humoral antibodies against donor cells. , 1966, Lancet.

[20]  P. Terasaki,et al.  Microdroplet Assay of Human Serum Cytotoxins , 1964, Nature.

[21]  M. Mishra,et al.  Luminex Crossmatch as a Successful Algorithm for Post-Transplant Follow-up in Developing Nations-A Study of 169 Consecutive Samples , 2015 .

[22]  T. Pruett Clinical relevance of Luminex donor-specific crossmatches: data from 165 renal transplants , 2010 .

[23]  R. Montgomery,et al.  The changing role of antibody testing in transplantation. , 2005, Clinical transplants.