Interactive rehabilitation and dynamical analysis of scalp EEG

Electroencephalography (EEG) has been used for decades to measure the brain's electrical activity. Planning and performing a complex movement (e.g., reaching and grasping) requires the coordination of muscles by electrical activity that can be recorded with scalp EEG from relevant regions of the cortex. Prior studies, utilizing motion capture and kinematic measures, have shown that an augmented reality feedback system for rehabilitation of stroke patients can help patients develop new motor plans and perform reaching tasks more accurately. Historically, traditional signal analysis techniques have been utilized to quantify changes in EEG when subjects perform common, simple movements. These techniques have included measures of event-related potentials in the time and frequency domains (e.g., energy and coherence measures). In this study, a more advanced, nonlinear, analysis technique, mutual information (MI), is applied to the EEG to capture the dynamics of functional connections between brain sites. In particular, the cortical activity that results from the planning and execution of novel reach trajectories by normal subjects in an augmented reality system was quantified by using statistically significant MI interactions between brain sites over time. The results show that, during the preparation for as well as the execution of a reach, the functional connectivity of the brain changes in a consistent manner over time, in terms of both the number and strength of cortical connections. A similar analysis of EEG from stroke patients may provide new insights into the functional deficiencies developed in the brain after stroke, and contribute to evaluation, and possibly the design, of novel therapeutic schemes within the framework of rehabilitation and BMI (brain machine interface).

[1]  K. Tsakalis,et al.  Information Flow and Application to Epileptogenic Focus Localization From Intracranial EEG , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Andrea Brovelli,et al.  EEG dynamics of the frontoparietal network during reaching preparation in humans , 2007, NeuroImage.

[3]  Yuhong Yang Elements of Information Theory (2nd ed.). Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas , 2008 .

[4]  T. Sinkjær,et al.  Symmetry of post‐movement beta‐ERS and motor recovery from stroke: a low‐resolution EEG pilot study , 2006, European journal of neurology.

[5]  Lewis A. Wheaton,et al.  Preparatory band specific premotor cortical activity differentiates upper and lower extremity movement , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Guido Nolte,et al.  Cortico-cortical networks in patients with ideomotor apraxia as revealed by EEG coherence analysis , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Left parietal activation related to planning, executing and suppressing praxis hand movements , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Leonidas D. Iasemidis,et al.  Dynamical resetting of the human brain at epileptic seizures: application of nonlinear dynamics and global optimization techniques , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Metin Akay,et al.  Measurement and Quantification of Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Human Epileptic Seizures , 2000 .

[10]  Giancarlo Comi,et al.  Movement-related event-related desynchronization in neuropsychiatric disorders. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[11]  Jiping He,et al.  A Computational Framework for Quantitative Evaluation of Movement during Rehabilitation , 2011 .

[12]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[13]  Charles F. Hockett,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[14]  Andreas Spanias,et al.  A Robust Estimation of Information Flow in Coupled Nonlinear Systems , 2010 .

[15]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[16]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Alan J. Thompson,et al.  Functional significance of the ipsilateral hemisphere during movement of the affected hand after stroke , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[18]  P. Brown,et al.  Corticocortical coupling in chronic stroke , 2004, Neurology.