A stabilized non-ordinary state-based peridynamics for the nonlocal ductile material failure analysis in metal machining process

Abstract This paper presents a non-ordinary state-based peridynamic formulation that can be applied to the metal machining analysis. The new formulation is first derived by utilizing the technique of mixed local/nonlocal gradient approximations to enforce the contact and essential boundary conditions associated in modeling the machining process. A stabilized peridynamic force vector state is then introduced to suppress the zero-energy modes which show up as the result of particle integration of the state-based peridynamic formulation. The introduction of the stabilized peridynamic force vector state eliminates the need of an estimation of the force–spring-like bond forces and leads to a consistent computation of peridynamic equations of motion using a general constitutive model. Finally, a continuum damage model is incorporated into the present state-based peridynamic formulation together with a decomposed stabilized approximate deformation gradient based on a neighbor particle reconstruction scheme to model the ductile metal failure and to maintain a well-defined geometric mapping in finite deformation. Three numerical benchmarks are analyzed to demonstrate the effectiveness and regularization of the present method for simulating the metal machining process.

[1]  Mgd Marc Geers,et al.  A critical comparison of nonlocal and gradient-enhanced softening continua , 2001 .

[2]  Thomas Slawson,et al.  Semi-Lagrangian reproducing kernel particle method for fragment-impact problems , 2011 .

[3]  J. Lemaître How to use damage mechanics , 1984 .

[4]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Nonlocal damage theory , 1987 .

[5]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A method for dynamic crack and shear band propagation with phantom nodes , 2006 .

[6]  C. T. Wu,et al.  A generalized approximation for the meshfree analysis of solids , 2011 .

[7]  Richard B. Lehoucq,et al.  Peridynamics as an Upscaling of Molecular Dynamics , 2009, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[8]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A meshfree unification: reproducing kernel peridynamics , 2014, Computational Mechanics.

[9]  S. Silling,et al.  A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics , 2005 .

[10]  Steven J. Plimpton,et al.  Implementing peridynamics within a molecular dynamics code , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[11]  J.S. Chen,et al.  A meshfree‐enriched finite element method for compressible and near‐incompressible elasticity , 2012 .

[12]  Erdogan Madenci,et al.  An adaptive dynamic relaxation method for quasi-static simulations using the peridynamic theory , 2010 .

[13]  S. Li,et al.  Synchronized reproducing kernel interpolant via multiple wavelet expansion , 1998 .

[14]  Philippe H. Geubelle,et al.  Non-ordinary state-based peridynamic analysis of stationary crack problems , 2014 .

[15]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Reproducing kernel particle methods , 1995 .

[16]  S. Silling Reformulation of Elasticity Theory for Discontinuities and Long-Range Forces , 2000 .

[17]  S. Silling,et al.  Peridynamic States and Constitutive Modeling , 2007 .

[18]  C. T. Wu,et al.  Localized particle boundary condition enforcements for the state-based peridynamics , 2014 .

[19]  Erkan Oterkus,et al.  Peridynamic Theory and Its Applications , 2013 .

[20]  Michael L. Parks,et al.  ON THE ROLE OF THE INFLUENCE FUNCTION IN THE PERIDYNAMIC THEORY , 2011 .

[21]  F. Bobaru,et al.  The Meaning, Selection, and Use of the Peridynamic Horizon and its Relation to Crack Branching in Brittle Materials , 2012, International Journal of Fracture.

[22]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models—I. Formulation , 1987 .

[23]  Milan Jirásek,et al.  Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage : Survey of progress , 2002 .

[24]  Houman Borouchaki,et al.  Adaptive remeshing in large plastic strain with damage , 2005 .

[25]  David John Littlewood,et al.  A nonlocal approach to modeling crack nucleation in AA 7075-T651. , 2011 .

[26]  Yong Guo,et al.  A Coupled Meshfree/Finite Element Method for Automotive Crashworthiness Simulations , 2009 .

[27]  Jung-Wuk Hong,et al.  A coupling approach of discretized peridynamics with finite element method , 2012 .

[28]  T. L. Warren,et al.  A non-ordinary state-based peridynamic method to model solid material deformation and fracture , 2009 .

[29]  S. Silling,et al.  Viscoplasticity using peridynamics , 2010 .

[30]  A. Atkins Modelling metal cutting using modern ductile fracture mechanics: quantitative explanations for some longstanding problems , 2003 .

[31]  Michael L. Parks,et al.  Peridynamic State-Based Models and the Embedded-Atom Model , 2014 .

[32]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[33]  C. T. Wu,et al.  Meshfree-enriched simplex elements with strain smoothing for the finite element analysis of compressible and nearly incompressible solids , 2011 .

[34]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Regularization of material instabilities by meshfree approximations with intrinsic length scales , 2000 .

[35]  Julian J. Rimoli,et al.  An approach for incorporating classical continuum damage models in state-based peridynamics , 2013 .

[36]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Reproducing Kernel Particle Methods for large deformation analysis of non-linear structures , 1996 .

[37]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin methods , 1994 .

[38]  Hui-Ping Wang,et al.  New boundary condition treatments in meshfree computation of contact problems , 2000 .

[39]  Huafeng Liu,et al.  Meshfree particle method , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[40]  C. T. Wu Kinematic constraints in the state-based peridynamics with mixed local/nonlocal gradient approximations , 2014 .

[41]  Erdogan Madenci,et al.  Combined finite element and peridynamic analyses for predicting failure in a stiffened composite curved panel with a central slot , 2012 .