A human-like steering model: Sensitive to uncertainty in the environment

The interaction between a human driver and an automated driving system may improve when the automation is designed in such a way that it behaves in a human-like manner. This paper introduces a human-like steering model, in which the driver adapts to the risk due to uncertainty in the environment. Current steering models take a risk-neutral approach, while the fields of economics and sensorimotor control suggest that humans exhibit risk-sensitive behavior. The proposed model uses a risk-sensitive optimal feedback control structure to predict steering behavior. The paper studies the effect of the risk-sensitivity parameter and compares the prediction of the risk-neutral and risk-sensitive controllers in a simulated abstraction of two scenarios: (a) driving while being subjected to lateral wind gusts and (b) overtaking an unpredictably swerving car. The simulation results show that the risk-sensitive model adapts to the uncertainty in the environment. Experimental data will be needed to validate the predictions of our model.

[1]  Charles C. MacAdam,et al.  Application of an Optimal Preview Control for Simulation of Closed-Loop Automobile Driving , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Philippe Chevrel,et al.  A sensorimotor driver model for steering control , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[3]  Pongsathorn Raksincharoensak,et al.  Risk predictive shared deceleration control: Its functionality and effectiveness of an early intervention support , 2016, 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[4]  Jessica Edquist,et al.  The effects of on-street parking and road environment visual complexity on travel speed and reaction time. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  A framework for motion planning in stochastic environments: modeling and analysis , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Risk-Sensitive Optimal Feedback Control for Haptic Assistance , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Model-based human-centered task automation: a case study in ACC system design , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[9]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[10]  David J. Cole,et al.  A review of human sensory dynamics for application to models of driver steering and speed control , 2016, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Dongpu Cao,et al.  Modeling Driver Steering Control Based on Stochastic Model Predictive Control , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  Robust Predictive Control for semi-autonomous vehicles with an uncertain driver model , 2013, 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[13]  Rhodes,et al.  Optimal stochastic linear systems with exponential performance criteria and their relation to deterministic differential games , 1973 .

[14]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  The Tuning of Human Motor Response to Risk in a Dynamic Environment Task , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  Samuel S. Monfort,et al.  Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[16]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[17]  N. Epley,et al.  The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle , 2014 .

[18]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  The optimal finite preview problem and its application to man-machine systems. , 1974 .

[19]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[20]  Bahram Ravani,et al.  A Stochastic Form of a Human Driver Steering Dynamics Model , 2007 .

[21]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Risk-Sensitive Optimal Feedback Control Accounts for Sensorimotor Behavior under Uncertainty , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  R. Fuller Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  G. Ripaccioli,et al.  Stochastic model predictive control with driver behavior learning for improved powertrain control , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).