When emulation becomes reciprocity.

It is well known that perceiving another's body movements activates corresponding motor representations in an observer's brain. It is nevertheless true that in many situations simply imitating another's actions would not be an effective or appropriate response, as successful interaction often requires complementary rather than emulative movements. At what point does the automatic tendency to mirror another's actions become the inclination to carry out appropriate, complementary movements? In the present study, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to explore corticospinal excitability in participants observing action sequences evoking imitative or complementary movements. TMS was delivered at five time points corresponding to different moments in time when key kinematic landmarks characterizing an observed action occurred. A variation in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) confirmed that the motor system flexibly shifts from imitative to complementary action tendencies. That shift appears to take place very precociously in time. Observers are attuned to advance movement information and can use it to anticipate a future course of action and to prepare for an appropriate, complementary action. Altogether, these findings represent a step forward in research concerning social action-perception coupling mechanisms providing important data to better understand the role of predictive simulation in social contexts.

[1]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Expertise and Attunement to Kinematic Constraints , 2008, Perception.

[4]  W. Dittrich Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[5]  F. Baldissera,et al.  Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement , 2005, Brain Research.

[6]  U. Castiello,et al.  From simulation to reciprocity: The case of complementary actions , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[7]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Prospective coding in event representation , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[9]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Pickup of Essential Kinematics Underpins Expert Perception of Movement Patterns , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[16]  N. Troje Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[17]  Ada Kritikos,et al.  Placing actions in context: motor facilitation following observation of identical and non-identical manual acts , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Visuomotor Priming , 2001 .

[20]  J. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. , 1988 .

[21]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[22]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  U. Castiello,et al.  Cues to intention: The role of movement information , 2011, Cognition.

[24]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[25]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in conscious humans. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Somatic and Motor Components of Action Simulation , 2007, Current Biology.

[28]  Mariella Pazzaglia,et al.  Sounds and scents in (social) action , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Armin Bruderlin,et al.  Perceiving affect from arm movement , 2001, Cognition.

[30]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Mapping the flow of information within the putative mirror neuron system during gesture observation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[32]  R. Nebes,et al.  Patterns of Hand Preference in a Student Population , 1975, Cortex.

[33]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  L. Craighero,et al.  Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Predicting the Effects of Actions: Interactions of Perception and Action , 2001, Psychological science.

[38]  M. Candidi,et al.  Mapping Implied Body Actions in the Human Motor System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Correlated changes in perceptions of the gender and orientation of ambiguous biological motion figures , 2008, Current Biology.

[40]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Hands on the future: facilitation of cortico‐spinal hand‐representation when reading the future tense of hand‐related action verbs , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[41]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[42]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[43]  M. Hallett,et al.  Optimal Focal Transcranial Magnetic Activation of the Human Motor Cortex: Effects of Coil Orientation, Shape of the Induced Current Pulse, and Stimulus Intensity , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[44]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[45]  L. Craighero,et al.  Modulation of spinal excitability during observation of hand actions in humans , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[46]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Understanding 'what' others do: mirror mechanisms play a crucial role in action perception. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[50]  M Jeannerod,et al.  The hand and the object: the role of posterior parietal cortex in forming motor representations. , 1994, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.