Special issue: Digital platforms for development

Digital platforms are the hot topic in research and practice today and are now an area of multidisciplinary research in its own right, involving economics, accounting, entrepreneurship, management and beyond. It is also a core subject in Information Systems (IS), research comprising tracks in all major IS conferences and the topic of multiple special issues (e.g., Constantinides et al., 2018) with another currently ongoing in this journal focussing on “Digital Platforms and Ecosystems”. The now mainstream research on digital platforms reflects the significance of the platform economy. Cusumano et al. (2020) points out that the top-ranked companies by market capitalization are Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google's parent company), and Amazon. Facebook, Alibaba and Tencent are not far behind. As of January 2020, these seven companies represented more than $6.3 trillion in market value, and all of them are platform-based businesses. Impressive though these figures may be on the commercial importance of digital platforms, the purpose of this special issue is to identify and foster a relatively unexplored research area concerning the nature, significance and impact of digital platforms for development. It is a response to the call from the ICT for development (ICT4D) community (e.g., Koskinen et al., 2018; Nielsen, 2017) to stimulate the development of a research agenda by inviting a variety of perspectives on digital platforms, including social, technical, economic, organisational, personal and environmental. Moreover, while existing research on digital platforms primarily focuses on the private sector, new business models and architectures in the context of the global North, we challenged the IS community to also explore non-profit platforms, platforms in the public sector and platforms in low resource and developing country settings. To proceed, contextualise and showcase the three articles in this issue, we must first get our hands around two key questions: what are digital platforms? and what is development? We leave it to the reader to explore the detailed review and definitions in this special issue, but our starting point for the first question is the definition from OECD (2019) (of ‘online’ platforms, a term used interchangeably with ‘digital’) as ‘... digital service that facilitates interactions between two or more distinct but interdependent sets of users (whether firms or individuals) who interact through the service via the Internet’ (p. 23). This broad definition includes platforms of different types across different domains of application such as for example search engines, app stores, social media, gig work, marketplaces, dating, music, video sharing and so on. By necessity, a high-level perspective must suffice and in this issue Bonina et al. (2021) offer a classification into transactional, innovation and hybrid platforms. This differentiates between transactional mediated marketplaces (e.g., Uber) and platforms offering a broad audience tools to innovate (e.g., the Android platform). There are also ‘hybrid’ platforms that display characteristics of both transaction and innovation. An example of a hybrid platform from the commercial sector is the ‘Valve’ gaming platform that enables transactional sales of the products and also the social networking on the ‘Steam’ platform. The innovation platform component known as ‘Steamworks’ contains developer resources and an app store for products built by 3rd party professional developers and amateurs. In this issue, Madon and Schoemaker (2021) consider the relevance of this typology of transaction, innovation and hybrid platforms to a development context. In addition, they build on the concept of ‘platformisation’ which refers to the process by which a closed system is transformed into an open platform for commercial purposes or for collaboration. For the understanding of digital platforms and development, Sein and Harindranath (2004) point out that ICT has come to be recognised as an important contributor to industrial and economic development, classified into three main perspectives: modernization, dependency, and human development. To this list, we can add the sustainability perspective encapsulated in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (UN, 2021). In short, the modernization DOI: 10.1111/isj.12364

[1]  Jean-Paul Van Belle,et al.  Digital platforms and institutional voids in developing countries: The case of ride-hailing markets , 2021 .

[2]  Petter Nielsen,et al.  Digital Global Public Goods , 2021, ArXiv.

[3]  Richard Heeks,et al.  From Digital Divide to Digital Justice in the Global South: Conceptualising Adverse Digital Incorporation , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Shirin Madon,et al.  Digital identity as a platform for improving refugee management , 2021, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  Silvia Masiero,et al.  Degenerative outcomes of digital identity platforms for development , 2021, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  Tony Roberts Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries , 2021 .

[7]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Digital labour platforms in Pakistan: institutional voids and solidarity networks , 2021, Inf. Technol. People.

[8]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda , 2021, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  The Future of Platforms , 2020 .

[10]  Angsana A. Techatassanasoontorn,et al.  Making the developing world a better place with high‐impact IS research , 2019, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  An Introduction to Online Platforms and Their Role in the Digital Transformation , 2019 .

[12]  Tony Roberts,et al.  Decolonising Neo-Liberal Innovation: Using the Andean Philosophy of 'Buen Vivir' to Reimagine Innovation Hubs , 2019, ICT4D.

[13]  Kari Koskinen,et al.  Digital Platforms in the Global South: Foundations and Research Agenda , 2019, ICT4D.

[14]  Fareesa Malik,et al.  Sharing Economy Digital Platforms and Social Inclusion/Exclusion: A Research Study of Uber and Careem in Pakistan , 2019, ICT4D.

[15]  Richard Duncombe,et al.  The Role of Digital Platforms in Disrupting Agricultural Value Chains in Developing Countries , 2019, ICT4D.

[16]  Shoshana Zuboff The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power , 2019 .

[17]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Development Outcomes of Training for Online Freelancing in the Philippines , 2018, Locally Relevant ICT Research.

[18]  Mark Graham Digital Economies at Global Margins , 2019 .

[19]  Christopher Kimaro,et al.  Information and Communication Technologies for Development. Strengthening Southern-Driven Cooperation as a Catalyst for ICT4D , 2019, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

[20]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective , 2018, Inf. Organ..

[22]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) , 2018, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[23]  Petter Nielsen Digital Innovation: A Research Agenda for Information Systems Research in Developing Countries , 2017, ICT4D.

[24]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Impact Sourcing: Employing Prison Inmates to Perform Digitally-enabled Business Services , 2014, CAIS.

[25]  B. Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  ‘The future’s bright, the future’s mobile’: a study of Apple and Google mobile application developers , 2013 .

[26]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Relational and institutional embeddedness of Web‐enabled entrepreneurial networks: case studies of netrepreneurs in China , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[27]  Dennis M. Murphy The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom , 2012 .

[28]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Conviviality of Internet social networks: An exploratory study of Internet campaigns in Iran , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  M. Shermer,et al.  Don't Be Evil , 2008 .

[30]  Maung K. Sein,et al.  Conceptualizing the ICT Artifact: Toward Understanding the Role of ICT in National Development , 2004, Inf. Soc..