Improving robotic stroke rehabilitation by incorporating neural intent detection: Preliminary results from a clinical trial

This paper presents the preliminary findings of a multi-year clinical study evaluating the effectiveness of adding a brain-machine interface (BMI) to the MAHI-Exo II, a robotic upper limb exoskeleton, for elbow flexion/extension rehabilitation in chronic stroke survivors. The BMI was used to trigger robot motion when movement intention was detected from subjects' neural signals, thus requiring that subjects be mentally engaged during robotic therapy. The first six subjects to complete the program have shown improvements in both Fugl-Meyer Upper-Extremity scores as well as in kinematic movement quality measures that relate to movement planning, coordination, and control. These results are encouraging and suggest that increasing subject engagement during therapy through the addition of an intent-detecting BMI enhances the effectiveness of standard robotic rehabilitation.

[1]  M. Bergamasco,et al.  A New Gaze-BCI-Driven Control of an Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation in Real-World Tasks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[2]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  A robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and assessment of the upper limb following incomplete spinal cord injury , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[3]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Optimization principles in motor control , 1998 .

[4]  B. Dobkin Brain–computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Marcia K. O'Malley,et al.  Proportional sEMG Based Robotic Assistance in an Isolated Wrist Movement , 2015, HRI 2015.

[6]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A Computational Model of Human-Robot Load Sharing during Robot-Assisted Arm Movement Training after Stroke , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  N. Hogan,et al.  A working model of stroke recovery from rehabilitation robotics practitioners , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  J. Kleim,et al.  Neural Plasticity: The Biological Substrate For Neurorehabilitation , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[9]  Réjean Plamondon,et al.  Modelling velocity profiles of rapid movements: a comparative study , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A Large Clinical Study on the Ability of Stroke Patients to Use an EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[11]  Chad G. Rose,et al.  System Characterization of MAHI EXO-II: A Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation. , 2014, Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference.

[12]  Jose L. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  A pre-clinical framework for neural control of a therapeutic upper-limb exoskeleton , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[13]  J. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Applications of Brain–Machine Interface Systems in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation , 2014, Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.

[14]  Jose L. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Design and Optimization of an EEG-Based Brain Machine Interface (BMI) to an Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Stroke Survivors , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[15]  Pamela R Bosch,et al.  Whole-Body Intensive Rehabilitation Is Feasible and Effective in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Retrospective Data Analysis , 2008, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[16]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[17]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2016, Circulation.

[18]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Detecting movement intent from scalp EEG in a novel upper limb robotic rehabilitation system for stroke , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Corwin Boake,et al.  Normalized Movement Quality Measures for Therapeutic Robots Strongly Correlate With Clinical Motor Impairment Measures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke , 2003, Neurology.

[21]  M. Lotze,et al.  Motor imagery , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[22]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A feasibility study of non-invasive motor-imagery BCI-based robotic rehabilitation for Stroke patients , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[23]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Myoelectrically controlled wrist robot for stroke rehabilitation , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  Jose L. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Sitting and standing intention can be decoded from scalp EEG recorded prior to movement execution , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[25]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Enhanced Low-Latency Detection of Motor Intention From EEG for Closed-Loop Brain-Computer Interface Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  N. Hogan,et al.  Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  A. U. Pehlivan,et al.  Current Trends in Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Promoting Patient Engagement in Therapy , 2014, Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.

[28]  N. Hogan,et al.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[29]  J. Millán,et al.  Detection of self-paced reaching movement intention from EEG signals , 2012, Front. Neuroeng..