Optical motion analysis techniques have been widely used in biomechanics for measuring large-scale motions such as gait, but have not yet been significantly explored for measuring smaller movements such as the tooth displacements under load. In principle, very accurate measurements could be possible and this could provide a valuable tool in many engineering applications. The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy and repeatability of the Qualisys ProReflex-MCU120 system when measuring small displacements, as a step towards measuring tooth displacements to characterise the properties of the periodontal ligament. Accuracy and repeatability of the system was evaluated using a wedge comparator with a resolution of 0.25 microm to provide measured marker displacements in three orthogonal directions. The marker was moved in ten steps in each direction, for each of seven step sizes (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, and 20 microm), repeated five times. Spherical and diamond markers were tested. The system accuracy (i.e. percentage of maximum absolute error in range/measurement range), in the 20-200 microm ranges, was +/-1.17%, +/-1.67% and +/-1.31% for the diamond marker in x, y and z directions, while the system accuracy for the spherical marker was +/-1.81%, +/-2.37% and +/-1.39%. The system repeatability (i.e. maximum standard deviation in the measurement range) measured under the different days, light intensity and temperatures for five times, carried out step up and then step down measurements for the same step size, was +/-1.7, +/-2.3 and +/-1.9 microm for the diamond marker, and +/-2.6, +/-3.9 and +/-1.9 microm for the spherical marker in x, y and z directions, respectively. These results demonstrate that the system suffices accuracy for measuring tooth displacements and could potentially be useful in many other applications.
[1]
E Nordh,et al.
Evaluation of skin- versus teeth-attached markers in wireless optoelectronic recordings of chewing movements in man.
,
1998,
Journal of oral rehabilitation.
[2]
Catherine Avril Holt,et al.
Three-dimensional analysis of the tibiofemoral joint using external marker clusters and the JCS approach - comparison of normal and osteoarthiritic knee function
,
2001
.
[3]
A Leardini,et al.
Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts.
,
1996,
Clinical biomechanics.
[4]
F. Noyes,et al.
Effects of structure and strain measurement technique on the material properties of young human tendons and fascia.
,
1984,
Journal of biomechanics.
[5]
Tatyana Lopatenok,et al.
The Model-Based Approach of Markers Identification and Visualisation in Motion Capturing Systems
,
2002,
SimVis.
[6]
Paul Allard,et al.
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Human Locomotion
,
1998
.
[7]
Nicola D'Apuzzo.
Surface measurement and tracking of human body parts from multi-image video sequences
,
2002
.
[8]
M. Adams,et al.
Spondylolysis: Bending of the Inferior Articular Processes of Lumbar Vertebrae During Simulated Spinal Movements
,
1994,
Spine.
[9]
S L Woo,et al.
The biomechanical and biochemical properties of swine tendons--long term effects of exercise on the digital extensors.
,
1980,
Connective tissue research.
[10]
J Middleton,et al.
A validated finite element method study of orthodontic tooth movement in the human subject.
,
2001,
Journal of orthodontics.