A Digital Curate's Egg: A Risk Management Approach to Enhancing Data Management Practices

This article provides a case study of work performed at King's College London to survey information management practices, policies, and procedures applied by data creators and managers within three research units and three business units, and to determine the risk factors that may limit access and use of their digital assets over time. The assessment framework adopted to assess practices brings together components of the Data Asset Framework to analyze ad hoc data handling processes performed within departments, and combines it with the system-level Digital Repository Audit Methodology Based on Risk Assessment evaluation framework to identify the potential risks that may occur and the consequences to the institution or individual unless action is taken. It was found that data management activities within the academic units are comparable to a curate's egg, containing many actions performed in conformance to best practice, but also including poorly considered approaches that have the potential to restrict access and use of digital information over time. To address the identified risk factors, a holistic, multi-tiered approach should be adopted through the development of an institution-level management infrastructure and policy framework, supported by ongoing training and advice for staff directly working with data.

[1]  Sarah Callaghan,et al.  Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[2]  Ronald Yanosky Institutional Data Management in Higher Education. ECAR Key Findings. , 2009 .

[3]  L. Lyon Dealing with Data: Roles, Rights, Responsibilities and Relationships. Consultancy Report. , 2007 .

[4]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Preservation decisions: terms and conditions apply , 2011, JCDL '11.

[5]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Preservation Decisions: Terms and Conditions Apply Challenges, Misperceptions and Lessons Learned in Preservation Planning , 2011 .

[6]  David Giaretta,et al.  Curating Scientific Research Data for the Long Term: A Preservation Analysis Method in Context , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[7]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  Designing Digital Preservation Solutions: A Risk Management-Based Approach , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[8]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[9]  Judy Pearsall,et al.  New Oxford dictionary of English , 2001 .

[10]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  Modeling Contextual Concerns in Enterprise Architecture , 2011, 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops.

[11]  Peter Sefton,et al.  Embedding Metadata and Other Semantics in Word Processing Documents , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[12]  Graham Pryor,et al.  Skilling Up to Do Data: Whose Role, Whose Responsibility, Whose Career? , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[13]  Melissa H. Cragin,et al.  Constructing Data Curation Profiles , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[14]  Seamus Ross,et al.  The Data Audit Framework: a toolkit to identify research assets and improve data management in research led institutions , 2008, iPRES.

[15]  Sarah Higgins,et al.  The dcc curation lifecycle model , 2008, JCDL '08.