Quantification of discrete behavioral components of the MDS-UPDRS

INTRODUCTION The Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the current gold standard means of assessing disease state in Parkinson's disease (PD). Objective measures in the form of wearable sensors have the potential to improve our ability to monitor symptomology in PD, but numerous methodological challenges remain, including integration into the MDS-UPDRS. We applied a structured video coding scheme to temporally quantify clinical, scripted, motor tasks in the MDS-UPDRS for the alignment and integration of objective measures collected in parallel. METHODS 25 PD subjects completed two video-recorded MDS-UPDRS administrations. Visual cues of task performance reliably identifiable in video recordings were used to construct a structured video coding scheme. Postural transitions were also defined and coded. Videos were independently coded by two trained non-expert coders and a third expert coder to derive indices of inter-rater agreement. RESULTS 50 videos of MDS-UPDRS performance were fully coded. Non-expert coders achieved a high level of agreement (Cohen's κ > 0.8) on all postural transitions and scripted motor tasks except for Postural Stability (κ = 0.617); this level of agreement was largely maintained even when more stringent thresholds for agreement were applied. Durations coded by non-expert coders and expert coders were significantly different (p < 0.05) for only Postural Stability and Rigidity, Left Upper Limb. CONCLUSIONS Non-expert coders consistently and accurately quantified discrete behavioral components of the MDS-UPDRS using a structured video coding scheme; this represents a novel, promising approach for integrating objective and clinical measures into unified, longitudinal datasets.

[1]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study , 1998, Pain.

[2]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Detection of walking periods and number of steps in older adults and patients with Parkinson's disease: accuracy of a pedometer and an accelerometry-based method. , 2008, Age and ageing.

[3]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturized triaxial accelerometer-based system: accuracy in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  S. Moore,et al.  Validation of 24-hour ambulatory gait assessment in Parkinson's disease with simultaneous video observation , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[5]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  S. Papapetropoulos,et al.  Digital Health Revolution: Is it Time for Affordable Remote Monitoring for Parkinson’s Disease? , 2015, Front. Neurol..

[7]  Martina Mancini,et al.  Objective biomarkers of balance and gait for Parkinson's disease using body‐worn sensors , 2013, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[8]  R. Claudino,et al.  Anticipatory and Compensatory Postural Adjustments in Response to External Lateral Shoulder Perturbations in Subjects with Parkinson’s Disease , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  J. Jankovic Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis , 2008, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[10]  Martina Mancini,et al.  Levodopa Is a Double‐Edged Sword for Balance and Gait in People With Parkinson's Disease , 2015, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[11]  Jan Kassubek,et al.  Analysis and Visualization of 3D Motion Data for UPDRS Rating of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease , 2016, Sensors.

[12]  F B Horak,et al.  Neural Control of Walking in People with Parkinsonism. , 2016, Physiology.

[13]  M. Mancini,et al.  Sit-stand and stand-sit transitions in older adults and patients with Parkinson’s disease: event detection based on motion sensors versus force plates , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  D. Heldman,et al.  Clinician versus machine: reliability and responsiveness of motor endpoints in Parkinson's disease. , 2014, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[15]  M. Breteler,et al.  Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  Henning Holle,et al.  EasyDIAg: A tool for easy determination of interrater agreement , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[17]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Monitoring Motor Fluctuations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Sensors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[18]  M. Stern,et al.  Parkinson's Disease Biomarkers: Where Are We and Where Do We Go Next? , 2017, Movement disorders clinical practice.

[19]  Max A. Little,et al.  Technology in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities , 2016, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[20]  V. Weerdesteyn,et al.  The retropulsion test: a good evaluation of postural instability in Parkinson's disease? , 2015, Journal of Parkinson's disease.

[21]  Svjetlana Miocinovic,et al.  Automated gait and balance parameters diagnose and correlate with severity in Parkinson disease , 2014, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[22]  Linda Tickle-Degnen,et al.  Reliability and validity of a videotape method to describe expressive behavior in persons with Parkinson's disease. , 2005, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[23]  M. Ferrarin,et al.  An Experimental Paradigm to Assess Postural Stabilization: No More Movement and Not Yet Posture , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  K. Aminian,et al.  Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[25]  T. Dall,et al.  The current and projected economic burden of Parkinson's disease in the United States , 2013, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[26]  Dongni Johansson,et al.  Wearable sensors for clinical applications in epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, and stroke: a mixed-methods systematic review , 2018, Journal of Neurology.

[27]  Matthew S. Goodwin,et al.  Recognizing stereotypical motor movements in the laboratory and classroom: a case study with children on the autism spectrum , 2009, UbiComp.

[28]  C. Tanner,et al.  Biomarker‐driven phenotyping in Parkinson's disease: A translational missing link in disease‐modifying clinical trials , 2017, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[29]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observer agreement for timed-event sequential data: A comparison of time-based and event-based algorithms , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[30]  Marijn M. L. van den Houten,et al.  Physical activity monitoring in patients with peripheral arterial disease: validation of an activity monitor. , 2014, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.