Taking on the “new normal”: emerging psychologists' reflections on the COVID-19 pandemic

PurposeCoronavirus (COVID-19) rapidly became the “new normal” with profound implications for everyone's daily life. In this paper, emerging psychologists from diverse cultural backgrounds discuss four main ways in which COVID-19 impacted diverse psychological populations.Design/methodology/approachThis paper was written as a reflection on how COVID-19 has impacted diverse psychological populations using authors' academic and personal experiences.FindingsFirst, the authors explore inaccessible populations with a focus on domestic violence victims living in rural areas. Second, the authors consider consequences of social isolation with a focus on remote workers. Third, the authors investigate the consequences of public (dis)trust in the pandemic with a focus on migrant worker communities. Finally, the authors discuss pandemic-relevant subcultures with a focus on “anti-vaxxers”.Social implicationsThe paper concludes with a discussion of negative implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on diverse psychological populations, both for the present and the future, and ends with an action plan of possible interventions to overcome these limitations.Originality/valueOverall, the current paper provides a broad overview of how the pandemic has shaped and will continue to shape diverse psychological populations.

[1]  Liad Bareket-Bojmel,et al.  Out of sight but not out of mind: The role of loneliness and hope in remote work and in job engagement , 2023, Personality and Individual Differences.

[2]  Anonymous COVAX delivers its 1 billionth COVID-19 vaccine doseCOVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide , 2022, Saudi medical journal.

[3]  Nihal Durmaz,et al.  The dramatic increase in anti-vaccine discourses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a social network analysis of Twitter , 2022, Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.

[4]  Elizabeth W. Dunn,et al.  Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward , 2022, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[5]  Anant Pai,et al.  “Are you safe to talk?”: Perspectives of Service Providers on Experiences of Domestic Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2022, Journal of Family Violence.

[6]  Matúš Grežo,et al.  Light and Dark core of personality and the adherence to COVID-19 containment measures: The roles of motivation and trust in government , 2022, Acta Psychologica.

[7]  L. Atwater,et al.  Supporting the productivity and wellbeing of remote workers , 2021, Organizational Dynamics.

[8]  K. Cloyes,et al.  Bots and nots: safeguarding online survey research with underrepresented and diverse populations , 2021, Psychology and sexuality.

[9]  Helmut Rainer,et al.  Quantifying domestic violence in times of crisis: An internet search activity‐based measure for the COVID‐19 pandemic , 2021, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society).

[10]  Daniel L. King,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 on addiction treatment in New Zealand , 2021, Addictive Behaviors.

[11]  J. Singh,et al.  Early-career international academics' learning and teaching experiences during COVID-19 in Australia: A collaborative autoethnography , 2021, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[12]  Vincenza Capone,et al.  Smart Working and Well-Being before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review , 2021, European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education.

[13]  A. Sivunen,et al.  The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency on isolation and psychological distress , 2021, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

[14]  E. Berry,et al.  Connection, constraint, and coping: A qualitative study of experiences of loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK , 2021, PloS one.

[15]  P. Klainin-Yobas,et al.  Psychological impacts and online interventions of social isolation amongst older adults during COVID‐19 pandemic: A scoping review , 2021, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  F. Procentese,et al.  Well-Being and the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, European Psychologist.

[17]  Wai Meng Yap Work life balance and job-related affective wellbeing: moderating role of work autonomy , 2021 .

[18]  Melvin C W Goh,et al.  Experiences and challenges in mental health research and practice during COVID-19: Perspectives from emerging psychologists across five countries , 2021, Asian Journal of Psychiatry.

[19]  G. Knight,et al.  COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration , 2021, Journal of Business Research.

[20]  Boaz M. Ben-David,et al.  Vaccination anxiety when vaccinations are available: The role of existential concerns , 2021, Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress.

[21]  A. Law,et al.  Lottery-Based Incentive in Ohio and COVID-19 Vaccination Rates. , 2021, JAMA.

[22]  Dr Henry Ngenyam Bang,et al.  Health and economic imperatives for households in the context of the anti-Covid-19 strategy in Cameroon. The case of Yaounde , 2021, Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences.

[23]  C. Latkin,et al.  Knowledge and awareness of COVID-19 among Indonesian migrant workers in the Greater China Region , 2021, Public Health.

[24]  G. Stoker,et al.  Lack of Trust, Conspiracy Beliefs, and Social Media Use Predict COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy , 2021, Vaccines.

[25]  Inés Berniell,et al.  COVID-19 lockdown and domestic violence: Evidence from internet-search behavior in 11 countries , 2021, European Economic Review.

[26]  A. Baines,et al.  #Scamdemic, #Plandemic, or #Scaredemic: What Parler Social Media Platform Tells Us about COVID-19 Vaccine , 2021, Vaccines.

[27]  A. Davies COVID-19 and ICT-Supported Remote Working: Opportunities for Rural Economies , 2021, World.

[28]  G. Katul,et al.  Intensity and frequency of extreme novel epidemics , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  A. Steptoe,et al.  Predictors of self-reported adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. A longitudinal observational study of 51,600 UK adults , 2021, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe.

[30]  A. Leung,et al.  The new normal of social psychology in the face of the COVID‐19 pandemic: Insights and advice from leaders in the field , 2021, Asian journal of social psychology.

[31]  S. Casale,et al.  The Effects of the Fear of Missing Out on People's Social Networking Sites Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of Online Relational Closeness and Individuals' Online Communication Attitude , 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry.

[32]  J. Li,et al.  The role of communication transparency and organizational trust in publics' perceptions, attitudes and social distancing behaviour: A case study of the COVID‐19 outbreak , 2021, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management.

[33]  R. Armitage Online ‘anti-vax’ campaigns and COVID-19: censorship is not the solution , 2020, Public Health.

[34]  S. Davis,et al.  Why Working from Home Will Stick , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[35]  S. Parker,et al.  Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective , 2020, Applied psychology = Psychologie appliquee.

[36]  Syed Mustafa Ali Shah,et al.  Prevalence, Psychological Responses and Associated Correlates of Depression, Anxiety and Stress in a Global Population, During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic , 2020, Community Mental Health Journal.

[37]  S. Madigan,et al.  COVID-19 and telemental health: Benefits, challenges, and future directions. , 2020 .

[38]  J. Newhagen,et al.  Overcoming resistance to COVID-19 vaccine adoption: How affective dispositions shape views of science and medicine , 2020 .

[39]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19 , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[40]  J. V. van Dijck,et al.  Social Media and Trust in Scientific Expertise: Debating the Covid-19 Pandemic in The Netherlands , 2020 .

[41]  Jon Roozenbeek,et al.  Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.

[42]  P. Hotez Anti-Science Extremism in America: Escalating and Globalizing. , 2020, Microbes and infection.

[43]  C. Zigler,et al.  Association Between Public Knowledge About COVID-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey , 2020, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[44]  D. Shaw Invisible Enemies: Coronavirus and Other Hidden Threats , 2020, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry.

[45]  R. Phillips,et al.  When Will the Pandemic End? Suggestions for US Communities to Manage Well-Being in the Face of COVID-19 , 2020, International Journal of Community Well-Being.

[46]  S. Dodds,et al.  Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: lessons for transformative service research , 2020 .

[47]  S. Uekusa,et al.  Collaborative autoethnography: “self-reflection” as a timely alternative research approach during the global pandemic , 2020 .

[48]  N. Milićević,et al.  Optimism-pessimism, conspiracy theories and general trust as factors contributing to COVID-19 related behavior – A cross-cultural study , 2020, Personality and Individual Differences.

[49]  Vaccine hesitancy could derail COVID-19 control , 2020, Emerald Expert Briefings.

[50]  Jiuping Xu,et al.  Prevalence and correlates of PTSD and depressive symptoms one month after the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in a sample of home-quarantined Chinese university students , 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders.

[51]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  No Participant Left Behind: Conducting Science During COVID-19 , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  S. Agarwal,et al.  “Infodemic” COVID 19: More Pandemic than the Virus , 2020, Indian journal of nephrology.

[53]  H. Li,et al.  YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? , 2020, BMJ Global Health.

[54]  D. Shek Protests in Hong Kong (2019–2020): a Perspective Based on Quality of Life and Well-Being , 2020, Applied Research in Quality of Life.

[55]  Merten Reglitz,et al.  The Human Right to Free Internet Access , 2020, Journal of Applied Philosophy.

[56]  K. Tabb,et al.  Experiencing Health Services Research in the Global South: a Collaborative Autoethnography of Two Social Work Researchers , 2018, Global social welfare : research, policy & practice.

[57]  Timothy Callaghan,et al.  Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. , 2018, Social science & medicine.

[58]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  The Psychological Roots of Anti-Vaccination Attitudes: A 24-Nation Investigation , 2018, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[59]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Attitude Roots and Jiu Jitsu Persuasion: Understanding and Overcoming the Motivated Rejection of Science , 2017, The American psychologist.

[60]  Winter A. Mason,et al.  Internet research in psychology. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[61]  V. Gamble Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. , 1997, American journal of public health.