The rate of recovery from stroke - and its measurement.

A battery of tests to measure improvement over time in physical recovery of stroke patients - and to compare this with varying levels of disability at onset, is described. Recovery in a series of 135 patients with fresh stroke treated by traditional methods of rehabilitation is principally in the first 3 months - but also continues in the second 3 months, except for muscle power. Recovery after 6 months is least in muscle power and is limited mainly to walking and mobility (e.g. getting out of the house) which in some cases may be due to altered environmental factors. At onset only 62 per cent showed moderate or severe impairment of muscle power compared to 88 per cent with similar impairment in mobility and dependency. By 1 year 30 per cent of survivors remained dependent.

[1]  P. Brennan,et al.  Assessment of motor function in studies of chronic disability , 1978, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Stewart,et al.  Stroke recovery: he can but does he? , 1979, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[3]  G. Kinsella,et al.  Repeatability and validity of a modified activities of daily living (ADL) index in studies of chronic disability. , 1979, International rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  P. Laycock,et al.  How much physical therapy for patients with stroke? , 1978, British medical journal.

[5]  K. Andrews,et al.  Why admit stroke patients to hospital? , 1978, Age and ageing.

[6]  A. Cassvan,et al.  Lateralization in stroke syndromes as a factor in ambulation. , 1976, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  S. Licht.  Stroke and its rehabilitation , 1975 .

[8]  V. Carstairs,et al.  The handicapped and impaired in Great Britain. , 1972, Health bulletin.

[9]  L. Hurwitz,et al.  Rehabilitation of hemiplegia: indices of assessment and prognosis. , 1972, British medical journal.

[10]  M Robinson,et al.  Factors Influencing Stroke Rehabilitation , 1971, Stroke.

[11]  A. Cochrane.  Burden of Cerebrovascular Disease , 1970, British medical journal.

[12]  F. Kennedy,et al.  Stroke intensive care--an appraisal. , 1970, American heart journal.

[13]  C. Wylie.  Measuring end results of rehabilitation of patients with stroke. , 1967, Public health reports.

[14]  Vaun A. Newill,et al.  PART II. LONG-TERM COURSE OF 159 PATIENTS , 1966 .

[15]  G. Hirschberg,et al.  RECOVERY OF VOLUNTARY MOTION IN UPPER EXTREMITY FOLLOWING HEMIPLEGIA. , 1965, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  D. Carroll,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE TEST OF UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION. , 1965, Journal of chronic diseases.

[17]  S. Katz,et al.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. , 1963, JAMA.

[18]  A. Willner,et al.  Problems in measurement and evaluation of rehabilitation. , 1962, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  D. Carroll.  The disability in hemiplegia caused by cerebrovascular disease: serial studies of 98 cases. , 1962, Journal of chronic diseases.

[20]  A new approach to the objective evaluation of physical disability. , 1962, Journal of chronic diseases.

[21]  Thestaffofthebenjaminrosehos.  MULTIDISCIPLINARY studies of illness in aged persons. II. A new classification of functional status in activities of daily living. , 1959, Journal of chronic diseases.

[22]  G. F. Adams,et al.  Assessment and prognosis in hemiplegia. , 1953, Lancet.

[23]  H. Dinken.  The evaluation of disability and treatment in hemiplegia. , 1947, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.