The Influence of Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows on Multistage Compressor Performance

Experiments were performed on a low-speed multistage axial-flow compressor to assess the effects of shrouded stator cavity flows on aerodynamic performance. Five configurations, which involved systematic changes in seal-tooth leakage rates and/or elimination of the shrouded stator cavities, were tested. Rig data indicate increasing seal-tooth leakage substantially degraded compressor performance. For every 1 percent increase in seal-tooth clearance-to-span ratio, the decrease in pressure rise was 3 percent and the reduction in efficiency was 1 point. These observed performance penalties are comparable to those commonly reported for rotor and cantilevered stator tip clearance variations. The performance degradation observed with increased leakage was brought about in two distinct ways. First, increasing seal-tooth leakage directly spoiled the near-hub performance of the stator row in which leakage occurred. Second, the altered stator exit flow conditions, caused by increased leakage, impaired the performance of the next downstream stage by decreasing the work input of the rotor and increasing total pressure loss of the stator. These trends caused the performance of downstream stages to deteriorate progressively. Numerical simulations of the test rig stator flow field were also conducted to help resolve important fluid mechanic details associated with the interaction between the primary and cavity flows. Simulationmore » results show that fluid originating in the upstream cavity collected on the stator suction surface when the cavity tangential momentum was low and on the pressure side when it was high. The convection of cavity fluid to the suction surface was a mechanism that reduced stator performance when leakage increased.« less

[1]  J. L. Jefferson,et al.  Some shrouding and tip clearance effects in axial flow compressors1 , 1958 .

[2]  D. C. Wisler Core compressor exit stage study. Volume 1: Blading design. [turbofan engines] , 1977 .

[3]  L. P. Ludwig Gas path sealing in turbine engines , 1980 .

[4]  Leroy H. Smith,et al.  Spanwise Mixing in Axial-Flow Turbomachines , 1982 .

[5]  R. Moffat Using Uncertainty Analysis in the Planning of an Experiment , 1985 .

[6]  D. C. Wisler,et al.  Secondary Flow, Turbulent Diffusion, and Mixing in Axial-Flow Compressors , 1987 .

[7]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers , 1989 .

[8]  Andrea Arnone,et al.  Investigation of advanced counterrotation blade configuration concepts for high speed turboprop systems. Task 5: Unsteady counterrotation ducted propfan analysis. Computer program user's manual , 1993 .

[9]  Bruce M. Steinetz,et al.  Engine seal technology requirements to meet NASA's advanced subsonic technology program goals , 1994 .

[10]  Philip Z. Blumenthal A PC program for estimating measurement uncertainty for aeronautics test instrumentation , 1995 .

[11]  C. R. Lejambre,et al.  Development and Application of a Multistage Navier-Stokes Flow Solver: Part II — Application to a High Pressure Compressor Design , 1995 .

[12]  Edward J. Hall,et al.  Parameterized study of high-speed compressor seal cavity flow , 1996 .

[13]  J. J. Adamczyk,et al.  The Effect of Hub Leakage Flow on Two High Speed Axial Flow Compressor Rotors , 1997 .

[14]  C. R. Lejambre,et al.  1995 ASME Gas Turbine Award Paper: Development and Application of a Multistage Navier–Stokes Flow Solver: Part II—Application to a High-Pressure Compressor Design , 1998 .