Internet (non-)use types and motivational access: Implications for digital inequalities research

Research into digital inequalities has shifted from a binary view of Internet use versus non-use to studying gradations in Internet use. However, this research has mostly compared categories of users only. In addition, the role of attitudes in digital inequalities has been largely overlooked. This article addresses these limitations by performing a systematic analysis of factors that distinguish low Internet users from non-users, regular users, and broad users. In addition to socio-demographic characteristics, we examine attitudinal variables. Results drawn from multinomial regressions indicate that attitudes play at least as large a role as socio-economic factors in determining the likelihood of belonging to specific (non-)user categories. This identifies positive attitudes toward technologies and the Internet as a crucial step toward Internet adoption. Hence, digital inequality research needs to consider factors other than traditional socio-economic ones to draw a complete picture.

[1]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[2]  Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen,et al.  Digital Skills: Unlocking the Information Society , 2014 .

[3]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[5]  Ragnar Andreas Audunson,et al.  Technology and Social Inclusion. Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Documentation.

[6]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  University students' self‐efficacy and their attitudes toward the Internet: the role of students' perceptions of the Internet , 2006 .

[7]  Maria Bakardjieva,et al.  Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life , 2005 .

[8]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide , 2004, New Media Soc..

[9]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Toward a Multifaceted Model of Internet Access for Understanding Digital Divides: An Empirical Investigation , 2015, Inf. Soc..

[10]  Alan C. Acock,et al.  Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata: Revised Edition , 2013 .

[11]  Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen,et al.  Measuring digital skills: from digital skills to tangible outcomes , 2014 .

[12]  Sergio Román.  Relational Consequences of Perceived Deception in Online Shopping: The Moderating Roles of Type of Product, Consumer’s Attitude Toward the Internet and Consumer’s Demographics , 2010 .

[13]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[14]  Bianca C. Reisdorf.  NON-ADOPTION OF THE INTERNET IN GREAT BRITAIN AND SWEDEN , 2011 .

[15]  R. Eynon,et al.  Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement , 2013 .

[16]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[17]  Bianca C. Reisdorf,et al.  A Quantitative Examination of Explanations for Reasons for Internet Nonuse , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  Grant Blank,et al.  Dimensions of Internet use: amount, variety, and types , 2014 .

[19]  Peter A. Chow-White,et al.  Digital Divide , 2018, Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets.

[20]  C. Baker,et al.  Attitudes and language , 1992 .

[21]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  The digital divide shifts to differences in usage , 2014, New Media Soc..

[22]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[23]  N. Selwyn,et al.  Whose Internet is it Anyway? , 2005 .

[24]  A. Gonzales.  The contemporary US digital divide: from initial access to technology maintenance , 2016 .

[25]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[26]  Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen,et al.  Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills , 2011 .

[27]  José Manuel Ortega Egea,et al.  Diffusion and usage patterns of Internet services in the European Union , 2007, Inf. Res..

[28]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  On the Periphery? Understanding Low and Discontinued Internet Use Amongst Young People in Britain , 2012 .

[29]  Amela Karahasanovic,et al.  Understanding the new digital divide - A typology of Internet users in Europe , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide , 2007, New Media Soc..

[31]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[32]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[33]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[34]  Bianca C. Reisdorf,et al.  Living Offline - A Qualitative Study of Internet Non-Use in Great Britain and Sweden , 2012 .

[35]  J. Guzmán.  Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata , 2013 .

[36]  John B. Horrigan,et al.  A Typology of Information and Communication Technology Users , 2007 .

[37]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage , 2009 .

[38]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[39]  E. Helsper,et al.  Digital skills in Europe: research and policy , 2015 .

[40]  Ellen Helsper,et al.  A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion , 2012 .

[41]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics , 2006 .

[42]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Beyond Access: the Digital Divide and Internet Uses and Gratifications , 2003 .