Learning to recognize objects

[1]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  A Model of Invariant Object Recognition in the Visual System: Learning Rules, Activation Functions, Lateral Inhibition, and Information-Based Performance Measures , 2000, Neural Computation.

[2]  J. P. Mossa,et al.  2D or not 2D? That is the question. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  J P Moss,et al.  2D or not 2D? That is the question. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  Guy Wallis,et al.  Temporal Order in Human Object Recognition Learning , 1998 .

[5]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[7]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Navigation and Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge in a Virtual Maze , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  James V. Stone.  Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  G. Wallis,et al.  Spatio-temporal influences at the neural level of object recognition. , 1998, Network.

[12]  S. Edelman,et al.  Computational Theories of Object Recognition Edelman -computation and Object Recognition Ii Box 1. Structural Descriptions ~ 7~ Recognition by Components Varieties of Alignment Multidimensional Histograms Approximation in Feature Space , 2022 .

[13]  H. Abdi,et al.  What Represents a Face? A Computational Approach for the Integration of Physiological and Psychological Data , 1997, Perception.

[14]  P. Schyns,et al.  Categories and percepts: a bi-directionnal framework for categorization , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  Roland Baddeley,et al.  Optimal, Unsupervised Learning in Invariant Object Recognition , 1997, Neural Computation.

[17]  C. Moorehead.  All rights reserved , 1997 .

[18]  E. Rolls,et al.  INVARIANT FACE AND OBJECT RECOGNITION IN THE VISUAL SYSTEM , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[19]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  Deformation Invariants in Object Recognition , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[20]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Role of learning in three-dimensional form perception , 1996, Nature.

[21]  Hh Bülthoff,et al.  A Bayesian framework for the integration of visual modules , 1996 .

[22]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Rapid visual learning in neurones of the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[23]  Roland Baddeley,et al.  An efficient code in V1? , 1996, Nature.

[24]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.

[25]  M. Tovée,et al.  Representational capacity of face coding in monkeys. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[27]  I Biederman,et al.  To what extent can matching algorithms based on direct outputs of spatial filters account for human object recognition? , 1996, Spatial vision.

[28]  R. Baddeley.  Visual perception. An efficient code in V1? , 1996, Nature.

[29]  Alan L. YuilleDivision.  A Bayesian Framework for the Integration of Visual Modules , 1996 .

[30]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  H. Barlow.  The neuron doctrine in perception. , 1995 .

[32]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[33]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Richard L Gregory,et al.  The artful eye , 1995 .

[35]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  A theory of shape constancy based on perspective invariants , 1994, Vision Research.

[36]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[37]  T. Poggio,et al.  The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition , 1994, Current Biology.

[38]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Neurophysiology of shape processing , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..

[39]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Distortion Invariant Object Recognition in the Dynamic Link Architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[41]  Y. Miyashita.  Inferior temporal cortex: where visual perception meets memory. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  J. Nadal,et al.  Optimal unsupervised learning , 1994 .

[43]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[44]  Malcolm P. Young,et al.  Objective analysis of the topological organization of the primate cortical visual system , 1992, Nature.

[45]  M. Young,et al.  Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.

[46]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[47]  E T Rolls,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[48]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[49]  A. Cowey,et al.  The role of the 'face-cell' area in the discrimination and recognition of faces by monkeys. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[50]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  M. Stryker.  Temporal associations , 1991, Nature.

[52]  Ronen Basri,et al.  Recognition by Linear Combinations of Models , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[53]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences , 1991, Neural Comput..

[55]  J. Leo van Hemmen,et al.  Temporal association , 1991 .

[56]  A. Neuren.  Visual Agnosia , 1991, Neurology.

[57]  R. Desimone.  Face-Selective Cells in the Temporal Cortex of Monkeys , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  A. Yuille.  Deformable Templates for Face Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[61]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  Y. Miyashita.  Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex , 1988, Nature.

[63]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Network model of shape-from-shading: neural function arises from both receptive and projective fields , 1988, Nature.

[64]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[65]  I. Rock,et al.  A case of viewer-centered object perception , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[66]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[67]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Perceptual Organization and the Representation of Natural Form , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[68]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Perception with an eye for motion , 1986 .

[69]  E. Rolls,et al.  Selectivity between faces in the responses of a population of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey , 1985, Brain Research.

[70]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual analysis of body movements by neurones in the temporal cortex of the macaque monkey: A preliminary report , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[71]  P. Jolicoeur.  The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[72]  B. Tversky,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General VOL . 113 , No . 2 JUNE 1984 Objects , Parts , and Categories , 2005 .

[73]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  An Extremum Principle for Shape from Contour , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[74]  J M Fuster,et al.  Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[75]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[76]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[77]  R. L. Solso,et al.  Prototype formation of faces: A case of pseudo-memory , 1981 .

[78]  S. Ullman,et al.  The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1981 .

[79]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[80]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Invariant Properties of the Motion Parallax Field due to the Movement of Rigid Bodies Relative to an Observer , 1975 .

[81]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[82]  H B Barlow,et al.  Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[83]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[84]  S. Ochs.  Integrative Activity of the Brain: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 1968 .

[85]  J. G. Wallace,et al.  Recovery from early blindness : a case study , 1963 .

[86]  J HOCHBERG,et al.  The psychophysics of form: reversible-perspective drawings of spatial objects. , 1960, The American journal of psychology.