Dual Adaptation Supports a Parallel Architecture of Motor Memory

Although our understanding of the mechanisms underlying motor adaptation has greatly benefited from previous computational models, the architecture of motor memory is still uncertain. On one hand, two-state models that contain both a fast-learning–fast-forgetting process and a slow-learning–slow-forgetting process explain a wide range of data on motor adaptation, but cannot differentiate whether the fast and slow processes are arranged serially or in parallel and cannot account for learning multiple tasks simultaneously. On the other hand, multiple parallel-state models learn multiple tasks simultaneously but cannot account for a number of motor adaptation data. Here, we investigated the architecture of human motor memory by systematically testing possible architectures via a combination of simulations and a dual visuomotor adaptation experimental paradigm. We found that only one parsimonious model can account for both previous motor adaptation data and our dual-task adaptation data: a fast process that contains a single state is arranged in parallel with a slow process that contains multiple states switched via contextual cues. Our result suggests that during motor adaptation, fast and slow processes are updated simultaneously from the same motor learning errors.

[1]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning , 1977, Brain Research.

[2]  P. Roland,et al.  Functional anatomy of reaching and visuomotor learning: a positron emission tomography study. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  B. Efron,et al.  Bootstrap confidence intervals , 1996 .

[4]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[5]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[7]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[9]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  MOSAIC Model for Sensorimotor Learning and Control , 2001, Neural Computation.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Motor Performance and Motor Learning in the Primary Motor Cortex of Monkeys Adapting to an External Force Field , 2001, Neuron.

[11]  J Randall Flanagan,et al.  Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  M. Mauk,et al.  Inhibition of climbing fibres is a signal for the extinction of conditioned eyelid responses , 2002, Nature.

[13]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Kinematics and Dynamics Are Not Represented Independently in Motor Working Memory: Evidence from an Interference Study , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M. Kawato,et al.  Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Kenji Doya,et al.  Meta-learning in Reinforcement Learning , 2003, Neural Networks.

[17]  K. Doya,et al.  Chaos may enhance information transmission in the inferior olive. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Kawato,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination of Two Modular Architectures for Switching Multiple Internal Models , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Kaoru Yoshida,et al.  Memory of Learning Facilitates Saccadic Adaptation in the Monkey , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Kawato,et al.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Ostry,et al.  Stimulation of the Posterior Parietal Cortex Interferes with Arm Trajectory Adjustments during the Learning of New Dynamics , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Shelhamer,et al.  Context‐Specific Adaptation of Saccade Gain Is Enhanced with Rest Intervals Between Changes in Context State , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Learning-related fMRI activation associated with a rotational visuo-motor transformation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  Kurt A. Thoroughman,et al.  Rapid Reshaping of Human Motor Generalization , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Yasmin L. Hashambhoy,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reach Errors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Stephen H Scott,et al.  Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Long lasting aftereffect of a single prism adaptation: directionally biased shift in proprioception and late onset shift of internal egocentric reference frame , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning , 2006, PLoS biology.

[30]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  L. Christensen,et al.  University of Birmingham Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum , 2007 .

[33]  Stephan Riek,et al.  The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  E. Miller,et al.  A Neural Circuit Model of Flexible Sensorimotor Mapping: Learning and Forgetting on Multiple Timescales , 2007, Neuron.

[35]  M. Kawato,et al.  Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  M. Kawato,et al.  Neural Correlates of Predictive and Postdictive Switching Mechanisms for Internal Models , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,et al.  Consolidation Patterns of Human Motor Memory , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Ian S Howard,et al.  Composition and Decomposition in Bimanual Dynamic Learning , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  D C Noll,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of motor acquisition and motor transfer. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Spontaneous recovery of motor memory during saccade adaptation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  Performance-Based Adaptive Schedules Enhance Motor Learning , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[42]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.