Subsurface electromagnetic induction imaging for unexploded ordnance detection

Abstract Detection and classification of unexploded ordnance based on electromagnetic induction have made tremendous progress over the last few years, to the point that not only more realistic terrains are being considered but also more realistic questions – such as when to stop digging – are being posed. Answering such questions would be easier if it were somehow possible to see under the surface. In this work we propose a method that, within the limitations on resolution imposed in the available range of frequencies, generates subsurface images from which the positions, relative strengths, and number of targets can be read off at a glance. The method seeds the subsurface with multiple dipoles at known locations that contribute collectively but independently to the measured magnetic field. The polarizabilities of the dipoles are simultaneously updated in a process that seeks to minimize the mismatch between computed and measured fields over a grid. In order to force the polarizabilities to be positive we use their square roots as optimization variables, which makes the problem nonlinear. The iterative update process guided by a Jacobian matrix discards or selects dipoles based on their influence on the measured field. Preliminary investigations indicate a fast convergence rate and the ability of the algorithm to locate multiple targets based on data from various state-of-the-art electromagnetic induction sensors.

[1]  B. E. Barrowes,et al.  Portable Electromagnetic Induction Sensor with Integrated Positioning , 2013 .

[2]  Juan Pablo Fernández,et al.  Combining electromagnetic induction and automated classification in a UXO discrimination blind test , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  I. Shamatava,et al.  Live-site UXO classification studies using advanced EMI and statistical models , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  George V. Keller,et al.  Rock and Mineral Properties , 2011 .

[5]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Electromagnetic Induction From Highly Permeable and Conductive Ellipsoids Under Arbitrary Excitation: Application to the Detection of Unexploded Ordnances , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Dean Keiswetter,et al.  Source separation using sparse-solution linear solvers , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  J. P. Fernández,et al.  Application of the normalized surface magnetic charge model to UXO discrimination in cases with overlapping signals , 2007 .

[8]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  A standardized excitation approach for classification of buried UXO , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[9]  Juan Pablo Fernández,et al.  A data-derived time-domain SEA for UXO identification using the MPV sensor , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Juan Pablo Fernández,et al.  APG UXO discrimination studies using advanced EMI models and TEMTADS data , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Chi-Chih Chen,et al.  Ultrawide-bandwidth fully-polarimetric ground penetrating radar classification of subsurface unexploded ordnance , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Transient electromagnetic inversion for multiple targets , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  J. Bladel,et al.  Electromagnetic Fields , 1985 .

[14]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Fast data-derived fundamental spheroidal excitation models with application to UXO discrimination , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Parameter estimation and inverse problems , 2005 .

[16]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Two nonlinear inverse methods for electromagnetic induction measurements , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Spheroidal Mode Approach for the Characterization of Metallic Objects Using Electromagnetic Induction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Broadband analytical magnetoquasistatic electromagnetic induction solution for a conducting and permeable spheroid , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Magnetoquasistatic response of conducting and permeable prolate spheroid under axial excitation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Application of the Normalized Surface Magnetic Source Model to a Blind Unexploded Ordnance Discrimination Test , 2010 .

[21]  Juan Pablo Fernández,et al.  A vector handheld frequency-domain sensor for UXO identification , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[22]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Electromagnetic induction spectroscopy for clearing landmines , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Simple phenomenological models for wideband frequency-domain electromagnetic induction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  A Discrimination Algorithm for UXO Using Time Domain Electromagnetics , 2001 .

[25]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Quasi-magnetostatic solution for a conducting and permeable spheroid with arbitrary excitation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[26]  Stephen D. Billings,et al.  Discrimination and classification of buried unexploded ordnance using magnetometry , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[28]  F. Shubitidze,et al.  A Man-Portable Vector Sensor for Identification of Unexploded Ordnance , 2011, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[29]  B. SanFilipo,et al.  The effects of seawater on the EMI response of UXO , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[30]  J. P. Fernández,et al.  SLO blind data set inversion and classification using physically complete models , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[31]  Dwain K. Butler,et al.  Implications of magnetic backgrounds for unexploded ordnance detection , 2003 .

[32]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[33]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Applying the physically complete EMI models to the ESTCP Camp Sibert Pilot Study EM-63 data , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[34]  P. Hansen Discrete Inverse Problems: Insight and Algorithms , 2010 .

[35]  James Byrnes,et al.  Unexploded Ordnance Detection and Mitigation , 2008 .

[36]  Kevin O'Neill,et al.  Applying a volume dipole distribution model to next-generation sensor data for multi-object data inversion and discrimination , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[37]  Oleg O Bilukha,et al.  Injuries and deaths from landmines and unexploded ordnance in Afghanistan, 2002-2006. , 2007, JAMA.

[38]  Mark Prouty MetalMapper System: Camp San Luis Obispo Discrimination Study , 2009 .

[39]  Dean Keiswetter,et al.  EMI Array for Cued UXO Discrimination , 2008 .

[40]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition , 1992 .

[41]  Benjamin Barrowes,et al.  Detection of multiple subsurface metallic targets using EMI data , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[42]  I. J. Won,et al.  GEM‐3: A Monostatic Broadband Electromagnetic Induction Sensor , 1997 .

[43]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Cooperative Inversion of Time Domain Electromagnetic and Magnetometer Data for The Discrimination of Unexploded Ordnance , 2008 .

[44]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Realistic Subsurface Anomaly Discrimination Using Electromagnetic Induction and an SVM Classifier , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[45]  Fridon Shubitidze,et al.  Simultaneous Identification of Multiple Unexploded Ordnance Using Electromagnetic Induction Sensors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[46]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for subsurface target detection and identification using time-domain electromagnetic induction data , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..