Brighter noise: Sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation

Two experiments investigated the effect of concurrently presented light on the perceived loudness of a low-level burst of white noise. The results suggest two points. First, white noise presented with light tends to be rated as louder than noise presented alone. Second, the enhancement in loudness judgments is resistant to two experimental manipulations: varying the probability that light accompanies sound and shifting from a rating method to a forced choice comparison. Both manipulations were previously shown to eliminate a complementary noise-induced enhancement in ratings of brightness. Whereas noise-induced enhancement of brightness seems to reflect a late-stage decisional process, such as a response bias, the present results suggest that light-induced enhancement of loudness may reflect an early-stage sensory interaction.

[1]  Christopher T. Lovelace,et al.  An irrelevant light enhances auditory detection in humans: a psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  D. H. Warren,et al.  The role of visual-auditory “compellingness” in the ventriloquism effect: Implications for transitivity among the spatial senses , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Randall S. Hansen,et al.  The effects of stimulus sequence and probability on perceptual processing , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  D. LaBerge,et al.  PRESENTATION PROBABILITY AND CHOICE TIME. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Lawrence E Marks,et al.  Cross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: Sensory interaction versus response bias , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Anatomical Evidence of Multimodal Integration in Primate Striate Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  J. Pernier,et al.  Early auditory-visual interactions in human cortex during nonredundant target identification. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  B. Stein,et al.  Enhancement of Perceived Visual Intensity by Auditory Stimuli: A Psychophysical Analysis , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[11]  M. Hallett,et al.  Neural correlates of cross-modal binding , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Meredith,et al.  On the neuronal basis for multisensory convergence: a brief overview. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  B. Stein,et al.  The Merging of the Senses , 1993 .

[14]  Stephen Lakatos,et al.  Cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual discrimination. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  Robert B. Welch,et al.  The “ventriloquist effect”: Visual dominance or response bias? , 1975 .

[16]  L. Marks,et al.  Absolute sensitivity to white noise under auxiliary visual stimulation1 , 1970 .

[17]  P Bertelson,et al.  Auditory-visual interaction and the timing of inputs , 1987, Psychological research.

[18]  J. Driver.  Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading , 1996, Nature.

[19]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Signal recognition as influenced by presentation schedules , 1967 .

[20]  G. Calvert.  Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.