Land Use Change in Soybean Production Systems in the Brazilian Savanna: The Role of Policy and Market Conditions

ABSTRACT This paper analyzes land use change in the Brazilian savanna and draws out policy implications about the adoption of resource management technologies. Resource management technologies are more likely to be adopted in areas experiencing a long-term deterioration in market conditions. Adoption occurs primarily to increase long-term economic viability. Thus adoption may coexist with adverse environmental and social impacts. Past opportunities for asset accumulation appear to be a pre-condition for adoption, indicating the importance of building up the resilience of farmers (particularly the resource-poor) during good times. Partnerships with the private sector can contribute significantly to technology diffusion.

[1]  M. Winograd,et al.  Dynamics of the agricultural frontier in the Amazon and savannas of Brazil: analyzing the impact of policy and technology , 1998 .

[2]  R. Vera,et al.  Land speculation and intensification at the frontier: a seeming paradox in the Colombian savanna , 1997 .

[3]  F. B. Dyck,et al.  Carbon sequestration in a Brown Chernozem as affected by tillage and rotation , 1995 .

[4]  J. Powell,et al.  An overview of mixed farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa , 1995 .

[5]  P. Dart,et al.  Report of the fourth external Programme and Management Review of the Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia. , 1995 .

[6]  Joyotee Smith,et al.  The Role of Technology in Agricultural Intensification: The Evolution of Maize Production in the Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria , 1994, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[7]  C. Klink,et al.  Ecological impact of agricultural development in the Brazilian cerrados. , 1993 .

[8]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Significance of grasslands in emission and absorption of greenhouse gases. , 1993 .

[9]  R. Lal,et al.  Drainage — tillage effects on a Crosby-Kokomo Soil Association in Ohio III. Organic matter content and chemical properties , 1992 .

[10]  D. Cassel,et al.  Tillage systems and soil properties in Latin America , 1991 .

[11]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Soil, Crop, and Water Management , 1991 .

[12]  Jock R. Anderson,et al.  Soil conservation in developing countries : project and policy intervention , 1990 .

[13]  E. Barbier.  The Farm-Level Economics of Soil Conservation: The Uplands of Java , 1990 .

[14]  M. Coy.  Pioneer frontier and urban development. Social and economic differentiation of pioneer towns in northern Mato Grosso (Brazil). , 1990 .

[15]  W. Edwards,et al.  Conservation Tillage in Sustainable Agriculture , 1990 .

[16]  G. Irwin,et al.  Condition of Rural Financial Intermediaries , 1985 .

[17]  J. Ashby.  The social ecology of soil erosion in a Colombian farming system , 1985 .

[18]  W. Huffman,et al.  The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables , 1984 .

[19]  M. Boehlje,et al.  Financial Stress in Agriculture: Implications for Producers , 1983 .

[20]  R. Lal.  Soil erosion on alfisols in Western Nigeria: I. Effects of slope, crop rotation and residue management , 1976 .

[21]  J. Parr.  Persistent Pesticides in the Environment—Second Edition , 1974 .

[22]  A. V. Holden.  Effects of Pesticides on Fish , 1973 .

[23]  L. G. Ensminger.  Farm Chemicals Handbook , 1964 .