The use of existing environmental networks for the post-market monitoring of GM crop cultivation in the EU.

The European Union (EU) Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment requires that both Case-Specific Monitoring (CSM) and General Surveillance (GS) are considered as post-market implementing measures. Whereas CSM is directed to monitor potential adverse effects of GMOs or their use identified in the environmental risk assessment, GS aims to detect un-intended adverse effects of GMOs or their use on human and animal health or the environment. Guidance documents on the monitoring of genetically modified (GM) plants from the Commission and EFSA clarify that, as appropriate, GS can make use of established routine surveillance practices. Networks involved in routine surveillance offer recognised expertise in a particular domain and are designed to collect information on important environmental aspects over a large geographical area. However, as the suitability of existing monitoring networks to provide relevant data for monitoring impacts of GMOs is not known, plant biotechnology companies developed an approach to describe the processes and criteria that will be used for selecting and evaluating existing monitoring systems. In this paper, the availability of existing monitoring networks for this purpose is evaluated. By cataloguing the existing environmental monitoring networks in the EU, it can be concluded that they can only be used, in the context of GMO cultivation monitoring, as secondary tools to collect baseline information.

[1]  F. Bigler,et al.  A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants. , 2005, Environmental biosafety research.

[2]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) ofgenetically modified plants , 2011 .

[3]  Kerstin Schmidt,et al.  European-wide GMO-monitoring data management and analysis , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[4]  F. Graef,et al.  GMO monitoring data coordination and harmonisation at EU level – Outcomes of the European Commission Working Group on Guidance Notes supplementing Annex VII of Directive 2001/18/EC , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[5]  D. Bartsch,et al.  Implication of the Environmental Liability Directive for General Surveillance – What to Protect? , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[6]  S. Aviron,et al.  Monitoring effects of GM crops on butterflies: the use of multiscale approaches for general surveillance , 2006, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[7]  Michiel Rutgers,et al.  General Surveillance of the soil ecosystem: An approach to monitoring unexpected adverse effects of GMO's , 2012 .

[8]  J. Schmidtke,et al.  Use of existing networks for the General Surveillance of GMP? Proposal of a reporting system and a Central Reporting Office , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[9]  B. Tinland,et al.  Implementation of a post-market monitoring for insect-protected maize MON 810 in the EU , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschütz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[10]  D. Bartsch,et al.  National coordination of GMO monitoring – a concept for Germany , 2006, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[11]  F. Graef,et al.  Determining indicators, methods and sites for monitoring potential adverse effects of genetically modified plants to the environment: the legal and conceptional framework for implementation , 2008, Euphytica.

[12]  A. Gathmann National implementation plan for MON810 monitoring in Germany – A way forward to improve General Surveillance? , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[13]  Olivier Sanvido,et al.  Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops , 2011, Transgenic Research.

[14]  F. Bigler,et al.  Monitoring or Surveillance? Balancing between theoretical frameworks and practical experiences , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[15]  J. Schiemann,et al.  A Critical Examination of the Potentials of existing German networks for GMO-Monitoring , 2006, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[16]  F. Herzog,et al.  Case-specific monitoring of butterflies to determine potential effects of transgenic Bt-maize in Switzerland , 2009 .

[17]  S. Aviron,et al.  Challenges and perspectives in decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified crops , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[18]  C. Bühler,et al.  Biodiversity Monitoring in Switzerland: What can we learn for general surveillance of GM crops? , 2006, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[19]  F. Bigler,et al.  An approach for post‐market monitoring of potential environmental effects of Bt‐maize expressing Cry1Ab on natural enemies , 2009 .