A Blind Deconvolution Technique Based on Projection Onto Convex Sets for Magnetic Particle Imaging

Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) is an emerging imaging modality that maps the spatial distribution of magnetic nanoparticles. The x-space reconstruction in MPI results in highly blurry images, where the resolution depends on both system parameters and nanoparticle type. Previous techniques to counteract this blurring rely on the knowledge of the imaging point spread function (PSF), which may not be available or may require additional measurements. This work proposes a blind deconvolution algorithm for MPI to recover the precise spatial distribution of nanoparticles. The proposed algorithm exploits the observation that the imaging PSF in MPI has zero phase in Fourier domain. Thus, even though the reconstructed images are highly blurred, phase remains unaltered. We leverage this powerful property to iteratively enforce consistency of phase and bounded l1 energy information, using an orthogonal Projections Onto Convex Sets (POCS) algorithm. To demonstrate the method, comprehensive simulations were performed without and with nanoparticle relaxation effects, and at various noise levels. In addition, imaging experiments were performed on an in-house MPI scanner using a three-vial phantom that contained different nanoparticle types. Image quality was compared with conventional deconvolution methods, Wiener deconvolution and Lucy-Richardson method, which explicitly rely on the knowledge of PSF. Both the simulation results and experimental imaging results show that the proposed blind deconvolution algorithm outperforms the conventional deconvolution methods. Without utilizing the imaging PSF, the proposed algorithm improves image quality and resolution even in the case of different nanoparticle types, while displaying reliable performance against loss of the fundamental harmonic, nanoparticle relaxation effects, and noise.

[1]  Tobias Knopp,et al.  Increasing the sensitivity for stem cell monitoring in system-function based magnetic particle imaging , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Tolga Çukur,et al.  Comparison of System-Matrix-Based and Projection-Based Reconstructions for Field Free Line Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2017 .

[3]  Leonard G. C. Hamey,et al.  A Functional Approach to Border Handling in Image Processing , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA).

[4]  Zhi Wei Tay,et al.  Seeing SPIOs Directly In Vivo with Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2017, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[5]  B Gleich,et al.  Weighted iterative reconstruction for magnetic particle imaging , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  P. L. Combettes The foundations of set theoretic estimation , 1993 .

[7]  Emine U Saritas,et al.  Effects of pulse duration on magnetostimulation thresholds. , 2015, Medical physics.

[8]  H. Trussell,et al.  Constructing membership functions using statistical data , 1986 .

[9]  M. Sezan,et al.  Tomographic Image Reconstruction from Incomplete View Data by Convex Projections and Direct Fourier Inversion , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Bo Zheng,et al.  Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) for NMR and MRI researchers. , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[11]  Bernhard Gleich,et al.  Simultaneous magnetic particle imaging (MPI) and temperature mapping using multi-color MPI , 2016 .

[12]  Bo Zheng,et al.  First in vivo magnetic particle imaging of lung perfusion in rats , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  D. Youla,et al.  Image Restoration by the Method of Convex Projections: Part 1ߞTheory , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  Magnetic Particle Imaging tracks the long-term fate of in vivo neural cell implants with high image contrast , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Image restoration subject to a total variation constraint , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  Magnetic Particle Imaging: A Novel in Vivo Imaging Platform for Cancer Detection. , 2017, Nano letters.

[18]  O. Woywode,et al.  Human PNS and SAR study in the frequency range from 24 to 162 kHz , 2013, 2013 International Workshop on Magnetic Particle Imaging (IWMPI).

[19]  Bernhard Gleich,et al.  Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles , 2005, Nature.

[20]  A. Enis Çetin,et al.  Projections onto convex sets (POCS) based optimization by lifting , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing.

[21]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  Multidimensional X-Space Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  W H Kullmann,et al.  First in vivo traveling wave magnetic particle imaging of a beating mouse heart , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  Magnetostimulation Limits in Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  The importance of phase in signals , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  A. Enis Çetin,et al.  Phase and TV Based Convex Sets for Blind Deconvolution of Microscopic Images , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[26]  Bernhard Gleich,et al.  MPI Safety in the View of MRI Safety Standards , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[27]  Yavuz Muslu,et al.  Calibration-Free Relaxation-Based Multi-Color Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  Justin J. Konkle,et al.  Magnetic Particle Imaging With Tailored Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Tracers , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Heinz H. Bauschke,et al.  Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces , 2011, CMS Books in Mathematics.

[30]  H. Trussell,et al.  The Landweber iteration and projection onto convex sets , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[31]  Tobias Knopp,et al.  Edge Preserving and Noise Reducing Reconstruction for Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  B Gleich,et al.  Three-dimensional real-time in vivo magnetic particle imaging , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Thorsten M. Buzug,et al.  Electronic Field Free Line Rotation and Relaxation Deconvolution in Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[35]  A. Enis Çetin,et al.  Denoising images corrupted by impulsive noise using projections onto the epigraph set of the total variation function (PES-TV) , 2015, Signal Image Video Process..

[36]  E. Saritas,et al.  Effects of Duty Cycle on Magnetostimulation Thresholds in MPI , 2017 .

[37]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  Relaxation in X-Space Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  The X-Space Formulation of the Magnetic Particle Imaging Process: 1-D Signal, Resolution, Bandwidth, SNR, SAR, and Magnetostimulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  Linearity and Shift Invariance for Quantitative Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Emine Ulku Saritas,et al.  X‐Space MPI: Magnetic Nanoparticles for Safe Medical Imaging , 2012, Advanced materials.

[41]  M Utkur,et al.  Relaxation-based viscosity mapping for magnetic particle imaging. , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  P. Brucker Review of recent development: An O( n) algorithm for quadratic knapsack problems , 1984 .

[43]  Emine U Saritas,et al.  Low drive field amplitude for improved image resolution in magnetic particle imaging. , 2015, Medical physics.

[44]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Efficient projections onto the l1-ball for learning in high dimensions , 2008, ICML '08.