Carotid artery stenosis--where do we go from here?

Carotid artery stenosis is an important risk factor for stroke. The European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) have demonstrated that the risk of stroke is reduced by surgery in patients with high grade stenosis (70-99%). However, because the two trials used different methods to measure stenosis, the results are not comparable and the level of stenosis which is associated with increased risk of stroke cannot be strictly defined. The benefit of surgery in asymptomatic patients is more controversial. Some studies indicate that surgery reduces the risk of stroke only in patients with ?80% stenosis and others have shown benefits for patients with ?60% stenosis. Overall, the benefits of surgery in asymptomatic patients are more difficult to define. Carotid lesion morphology also plays an important role in determining the risk of stroke; plaques which are ulcerated and echolucent are associated with a higher risk of stroke. Arteriography has been long regarded as the gold standard diagnostic tool for carotid stenosis. It is a costly and invasive technique with potentially serious complications. The results of arteriography have not been standardised which makes comparison of results from different laboratories difficult. Duplex ultrasound is inexpensive, non-invasive and can provide functional and anatomical information about vessel stenosis and plaque morphology. The use of echo-enhancing agents helps to reduce operator variability, improves ultrasound images and can help to distinguish between pseudo and true occlusions, to identify patients who will benefit most from surgery. The echo-enhancing agent Levovist(R) is safe, produces consistent results and can enhance images throughout the blood pool. Clinical studies with Levovist(R) have shown it to be safe and highly effective in improving diagnostic confidence in patients with carotid artery stenosis. The number of non-diagnostic scans is reduced markedly when Levovist(R) is used to enhance ultrasound images.

[1]  Eugene Z. Oddone,et al.  Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis , 1995 .

[2]  M. Mcclurken,et al.  Natural history of asymptomatic carotid plaque. Five year follow-up study. , 1987, American journal of surgery.

[3]  C. Warlow,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis , 1991, The Lancet.

[4]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  C. Warlow,et al.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? , 1995, The Lancet.

[6]  G. Sicard MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis: European Carotid Surgery Trialist' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235-43 , 1992 .

[7]  T Brott,et al.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc Committee, American Heart Association. , 1995, Stroke.

[8]  A. Halliday,et al.  The asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST). , 1995, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[9]  P. McCollum,et al.  Duplex ultrasonography and selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy: plaque morphology or luminal narrowing? , 1988, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  R. Green,et al.  Use of Computerized Cerebral Tomography in Selection of Patients for Elective and Urgent Carotiod Endarterectomy , 1985, Annals of surgery.

[11]  G W PICKERING,et al.  Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia. , 1954, Lancet.

[12]  B. Norrving,et al.  Hyperhomocysteinaemia in stroke: prevalence, cause, and relationships to type of stroke and stroke risk factors , 1992, European journal of clinical investigation.

[13]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Measuring Carotid Stenosis Time for a Reappraisal , 1993, Stroke.

[14]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Association between plasma homocysteine concentrations and extracranial carotid-artery stenosis. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  T. Riles,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Conventional Angiography, and Duplex Scanning , 1992, Stroke.

[16]  J. W. Norris,et al.  Silent Stroke and Carotid Stenosis , 1992, Stroke.

[17]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke. Identification of a high risk group (ACSRS). A natural history study. , 1995, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[18]  R. Schlief,et al.  Blood‐Pool Enhancement with SH U 508 A: Results of Phase II Clinical Trials , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[19]  W S Moore,et al.  Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  The correlation between carotid plaque ulceration and cerebral infarction seen on CT scan. , 1984, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Study design for randomized prospective trial of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic atherosclerosis. The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Group. , 1989, Stroke.

[22]  D Saloner,et al.  Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  H. Barnett,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy and the measurement of stenosis. , 1993, Stroke.