ACSE Networks and Autocorrelation Features for PRI Modulation Recognition

Pulse repetition interval (PRI) modulation recognition plays an important role in electronic warfare. Conventional recognition methods based on handcrafted features and elaborate threshold values suffer from the accuracy for multiple PRI modulations at low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with high percentages of missing pulses. In this letter, a method based on Asymmetric Convolution Squeeze-and-Excitation (ACSE) networks and features in autocorrelation domain is proposed to recognize six PRI modulation modes automatically. First, features in the time domain, frequency domain and autocorrelation domain are converted to images. Then the images are input into ACSE networks which can extract and learn deep features without complex data pre-processing. Finally, a linear layer will output modulation modes directly. Via simulations, robustness of autocorrelation features is proved. The simulation results also demonstrate that the proposed recognition method can achieve higher than 91% accuracy at −12 dB under normal conditions for six modulations and higher than 95% at −4 dB under extreme conditions. Compared with the conventional SVM and three CNN methods, ACSE networks outperform at low SNRs under extreme conditions.

[1]  H. Robbins A Stochastic Approximation Method , 1951 .

[2]  Hua Wu,et al.  Feature extraction for complicated radar PRI modulation modes based on auto-correlation function , 2016, 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC).

[3]  Alexander Charlish,et al.  Correlation Based Classification of Complex PRI Modulation Types , 2017, 2017 Sensor Signal Processing for Defence Conference (SSPD).

[4]  Xiang Wang,et al.  Toward Convolutional Neural Networks on Pulse Repetition Interval Modulation Recognition , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[5]  Enhua Wu,et al.  Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Mou Wang,et al.  PRI Modulation Recognition Based on Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks , 2020, IEEE Communications Letters.

[7]  Kaharudin Dimyati,et al.  Pulse repetition interval analysis using decimated Walsh-Hadamard transform , 2017, 2017 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf).

[8]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks , 2019, ICML.

[9]  Ulla Ruotsalainen,et al.  Hierarchical classification of dynamically varying radar pulse repetition interval modulation patterns , 2010, Neural Networks.

[10]  Jungong Han,et al.  ACNet: Strengthening the Kernel Skeletons for Powerful CNN via Asymmetric Convolution Blocks , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[11]  Jin-Woo Han,et al.  Pulse Repetition Interval Modulation Recognition Using Symbolization , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications.

[12]  Zhipeng Ge,et al.  Improved Algorithm of Radar Pulse Repetition Interval Deinterleaving Based on Pulse Correlation , 2019, IEEE Access.

[13]  Yanchao Liu,et al.  An improved algorithm for PRI modulation recognition , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC).

[14]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  Guobing Hu,et al.  An Efficient Method of Pulse Repetition Interval Modulation Recognition , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing.