Interaction techniques as a communication channel when presenting 3D visualizations

In this position paper we discuss the usage of various interaction technologies with focus on the presentations of 3D visualizations involving a presenter and an audience. While an interaction technique is commonly evaluated from a user perspective, we want to shift the focus from a sole analysis of the naturalness and the ease-of-use for the user, to focus on how expressive and understandable the interaction technique is when witnessed by the audience. The interaction process itself can be considered to be a communication channel and a more expressive interaction technique might make it easier for the audience to comprehend the presentation. Thus, while some natural interaction techniques for interactive visualization are easy to perform by the presenter, they may be less beneficial when interacting with the visualization in front of (and for) an audience. Our observations indicate that the suitability of an interaction technique as a communication channel is highly dependent on the setting in which the interaction takes place. Therefore, we analyze different presentation scenarios in an exemplary fashion and discuss how beneficial and comprehensive the involved techniques are for the audience. We argue that interaction techniques complement the visualization in an interactive presentation scenario as they also serve as an important communication channel, and should therefore also be observed from an audience perspective rather than exclusively a user perspective.

[1]  Paul Mulholland,et al.  Whole Body Interaction in Abstract Domains , 2011, Whole Body Interaction.

[2]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  Position Paper: Touch Interaction in Scientific Visualization , 2011 .

[3]  Yoshifumi Kitamura,et al.  Body-centric interaction techniques for very large wall displays , 2010, NordiCHI.

[4]  Anders Ynnerman,et al.  Multi-Touch Table System for Medical Visualization: Application to Orthopedic Surgery Planning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  John Philbeck,et al.  Evaluation of gesture based interfaces for medical volume visualization tasks , 2011, VRCAI '11.

[6]  Guilherme C. S. Ruppert,et al.  Touchless gesture user interface for interactive image visualization in urological surgery , 2012, World Journal of Urology.

[7]  Antonio Camurri,et al.  Towards Analysis of Expressive Gesture in Groups of Users: Computational Models of Expressive Social Interaction , 2009, Gesture Workshop.

[8]  Lars C. Ebert,et al.  Invisible touch—Control of a DICOM viewer with finger gestures using the Kinect depth camera , 2013 .

[9]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Interactive Slice WIM: Navigating and Interrogating Volume Data Sets Using a Multisurface, Multitouch VR Interface , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[10]  Stephen Brewster,et al.  Multimodal interactions for expressive interfaces , 2009 .

[11]  Chris Hand,et al.  A Survey of 3D Interaction Techniques , 1997, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[12]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Interaction proxemics and image use in neurosurgery , 2012, CHI.

[13]  Lutz Kettner,et al.  A classification scheme of 3D interaction techniques , 1995 .

[14]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  User-Evaluated Gestures for Touchless Interactions from a Distance , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia.

[15]  Olga Kulyk,et al.  Applying a User-centred Approach to Interactive Visualization Design , 2008 .

[16]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  A Design Study of Direct‐Touch Interaction for Exploratory 3D Scientific Visualization , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[17]  Martin Hachet,et al.  A Survey of Interaction Techniques for Interactive 3D Environments , 2013, Eurographics.

[18]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Touchless interaction in surgery , 2014, CACM.

[19]  Thomas Pederson,et al.  Touch-less interaction with medical images using hand & foot gestures , 2013, UbiComp.

[20]  Ilias Maglogiannis,et al.  Natural interaction expressivity modeling and analysis , 2013, PETRA '13.

[21]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  Visualization on Interactive Surfaces: A Research Overview / Visualisierung auf interaktiven Oberflächen: Ein Forschungsüberblick , 2013, i-com.

[22]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Poster: Volume Cracker: A bimanual 3D interaction technique for analysis of raw volumetric data , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[23]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  Gestures vs. Postures: 'Gestural' Touch Interaction in 3D Environments , 2012, CHI 2012.

[24]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  On the naturalness of touchless: Putting the “interaction” back into NUI , 2013, TCHI.

[25]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  Robert van Liere,et al.  Tangible Interaction for 3D Widget Manipulation in Virtual Environments , 2008, IPT/EGVE.

[27]  Hrvoje Benko,et al.  Multi-point interactions with immersive omnidirectional visualizations in a dome , 2010, ITS '10.

[28]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  Studying direct-touch interaction for 2D flow visualization , 2010 .

[29]  Mathieu Raynal,et al.  Classification of Interaction Techniques in the 3D Virtual Environment on Mobile Devices , 2014, HCI.

[30]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  Visualization on Interactive Surfaces: A Research Overview , 2013 .