Accuracy of treatment planning based on stereolithography in computer assisted surgerya).

Three-dimensional stereolithographic models (SL models), made of solid acrylic resin derived from computed-tomography (CT) data, are an established tool for preoperative treatment planning in numerous fields of medicine. An innovative approach, combining stereolithography with computer-assisted point-to-point navigation, can support the precise surgical realization of a plan that has been defined on an SL model preoperatively. The essential prerequisites for the application of such an approach are: (1) The accuracy of the SL models (including accuracy of the CT scan and correspondence of the model with the patient's anatomy) and (2) the registration method used for the transfer of the plan from the SL model to the patient (i.e., whether the applied registration markers can be added to the SL model corresponding to the markers at the patient with an accuracy that keeps the "cumulative error" at the end of the chain of errors, in the order of the accuracy of contemporary navigation systems). In this study, we focus on these two topics: By applying image-matching techniques, we fuse the original CT data of the patient with the corresponding CT data of the scanned SL model, and measure the deviations of defined parameter (e.g., distances between anatomical points). To evaluate the registration method used for the planning transfer, we apply a point-merge algorithm, using four marker points that should be located at exactly corresponding positions at the patient and at connective bars that are added to the surface of the SL model. Again, deviations at defined anatomical structures are measured and analyzed statistically. Our results prove sufficient correspondence of the two data sets and accuracy of the registration method for routine clinical application. The evaluation of the SL model accuracy revealed an arithmetic mean of the relative deviations from 0.8% to 5.4%, with an overall mean deviation of 2.2%. Mean deviations of the investigated anatomical structures ranged from 0.8mm to 3.2mm. An overall mean (comprising all structures) of 2.5mm was found. The fiducial registration error of the point-merge algorithm ranged from 1.0mm to 1.4mm. The evaluated chain of errors showed a mean deviation of 2.5mm. This study verifies that preoperative planning on SL models and intraoperative transfer of this plan with computer assisted navigation is a suitable and sufficiently reliable method for clinical applications.

[1]  George A. Brown,et al.  Application of Computer-Generated Stereolithography and Interpositioning Template in Acetabular Fractures: A Report of Eight Cases , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[2]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Quantitative analysis of factors affecting intraoperative precision and stability of optoelectronic and electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2002, Medical physics.

[3]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  H Bergmann,et al.  In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  D M Erickson,et al.  An opinion survey of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  Robert J. Maciunas,et al.  Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces [image-guided surgery] , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Quantification and Clinical Relevance of Head Motion During Computed Tomography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[8]  Foroutan,et al.  Stereolithography: application to neurosurgery , 1998, Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR.

[9]  M L Messersmith,et al.  An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  J. Bill,et al.  Stereolithography in oral and maxillofacial operation planning. , 1995, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  A Wagner,et al.  Computer-aided navigation in secondary reconstruction of post-traumatic deformities of the zygoma. , 1997, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[12]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Stereolithographic biomodeling to create tangible hard copies of cardiac structures from echocardiographic data: in vitro and in vivo validation. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  P. Sharrock,et al.  Stereolithographic models derived from X-ray computed tomography - Reproduction accuracy , 1997, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[14]  Jay B. West,et al.  Fiducial Point Placement and the Accuracy of Point-based, Rigid Body Registration , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[15]  H Niederdellmann,et al.  Surgical planning of computer-assisted repositioning osteotomies. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  Michael J Miller,et al.  The Accuracy of Stereolithography in Planning Craniofacial Bone Replacement , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[17]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Rolf Ewers,et al.  Point-to-point computer-assisted navigation for precise transfer of planned zygoma osteotomies from the stereolithographic model into reality. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[19]  U Kliegis,et al.  Individual model fabrication in maxillofacial radiology. , 1995, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[20]  R. Ewers,et al.  Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. , 2005, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[21]  H M Klein,et al.  Image- and model-based surgical planning in otolaryngology. , 1995, The Journal of otolaryngology.