Examining The Timing Effect Of Information Diffusion On Social Media Platforms: A Temporal Network Approach

Users’ attention is generally allocated in a rather inequitable manner on social media platforms (SMP). An important question for both researchers and practitioners is: how and why do the popular contents get popular? Previous studies have investigated this question from diverse perspectives. In this study, we propose that the time when the content is generated has a significant impact on its popularity on SMP. We examine this timing effect by adopting a temporal networks modelling approach. Our research hypotheses focus on how users’ active time periods affect the spread of information at the dyadic level, how the temporal order of information diffusion affects the popularity of online content at the global level. Using data from a popular micro-blog website, we find evidences that the time when a piece of online content is posted has a significant effect on the popularity of the content. This study contributes to the diffusion and social network literature by showing that the time dimension of social networks has a significant effect in the information diffusion process. Results from this study can shed light on how to design and implement more effective and successful viral marketing campaigns on SMP.

[1]  P. Doreian,et al.  Fixed list versus snowball selection of social networks , 1992 .

[2]  Dee T. Allsop,et al.  Word-of-Mouth Research: Principles and Applications , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[3]  J. Falkinger,et al.  Limited Attention as a Scarce Resource in Information-Rich Economies , 2008 .

[4]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Asymmetric Social Interactions in Physician Prescription Behavior: The Role of Opinion Leaders , 2008 .

[5]  M. Sarvary,et al.  Network Effects and Personal Influences: The Diffusion of an Online Social Network , 2011 .

[6]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[7]  Haewoon Kwak,et al.  Finding influentials based on the temporal order of information adoption in twitter , 2010, WWW '10.

[8]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[9]  Hema Yoganarasimhan,et al.  Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data , 2011, Quantitative Marketing and Economics.

[10]  Garrett P. Sonnier,et al.  A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Online Communications on Firm Sales , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research , 1990 .

[12]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[13]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[14]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Path lengths, correlations, and centrality in temporal networks , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  D. Strang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the popularity of online content , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[18]  N. Malhotra Information Load and Consumer Decision Making , 1982 .

[19]  Eric M. Schwartz,et al.  What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth? , 2011 .

[20]  P. Holme Network reachability of real-world contact sequences. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.