A systematic review of the applications of multi-criteria decision-making methods in site selection problems

The purpose of this paper is to perform a systematic review on the application of different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in solving the site selection problem across multiple problem domains. The domains are energy generation, logistics, public services and retail facilities. This study aims to answer the following research questions: Which evaluating criteria were used for each site selection problem domain? Which MCDM methods were frequently applied in a particular site selection problem domain?,The goals of the systematic review were to identify the evaluating criteria as well as the MCDM method used for each problem domain. A total of 81 recent papers (2014–2018) including 32 papers published in conference proceedings and 49 journal articles from various databases including IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Springer, Taylor and Francis as well as ScienceDirect were evaluated.,This study has shown that site selection for energy generation facilities is the most active site selection problem domain, and that the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method is the most commonly used MCDM method for site selection. For energy generation, the criteria which were most used were geographical elements, land use, cost and environmental impact. For logistics, frequently used criteria were geographical elements and distance, while for public services population density, supply and demand, geographical layout and cost were the criteria most used. Criteria useful for retail facilities were the size (space) of the store, demographics of the site, the site characteristics and rental of the site (cost).,This study is limited to reviewing papers which were published in the years 2014–2018 only, and only covers the domains of energy generation, logistics, public services and retail facilities.,MCDM is a viable tool to be used for solving the site selection problem across the domains of energy generation, logistics, public services and retail facilities. The usage of MCDM continues to be relevant as a complement to machine learning, even as data originating from embedded IoT devices in built environments becomes increasingly Big Data like.,Previous systematic review studies for MDCM and built environments have either focused on studying the MCDM techniques itself, or have focused on the application of MCDM for site selection in a single problem domain. In this study, a critical review of MCDM techniques used for site selection as well as the critical criteria used during the MCDM process of site selection was performed on four different built environment domains.

[1]  Javier Martínez-Gómez,et al.  Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador , 2017 .

[2]  Noel Bryson,et al.  A Goal Programming Method for Generating Priority Vectors , 1995 .

[3]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Risk Measurement and Risk Modelling using Applications of Vine Copulas , 2014 .

[4]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[5]  Hiroyuki Kohsaka,et al.  A Spatial Search-Location Model of Retail Centers , 2010 .

[6]  B. Abolmasov,et al.  GIS application for landfill site selection: a case study in Pančevo, Serbia , 2016, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[7]  Eva Loukogeorgaki,et al.  GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece , 2017 .

[8]  M Aghajani Mir,et al.  Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Jenhung Wang,et al.  Applying spatial-temporal analysis and retail location theory to public bikes site selection in Taipei , 2016 .

[10]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  A new approach for multiple objective decision making , 1993, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Rida Al-Adamat,et al.  AHP with GIS for a Preliminary Site Selection of Wind Turbines in the North West of Jordan , 2016 .

[12]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .

[13]  Jianping Yuan,et al.  Study of decision framework of offshore wind power station site selection based on ELECTRE-III under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case of China , 2016 .

[14]  Popi Konidari,et al.  A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments , 2007 .

[15]  M. S. García-Cascales,et al.  GIS-based onshore wind farm site selection using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods. Evaluating the case of Southeastern Spain , 2016 .

[16]  M. Pramanik Site suitability analysis for agricultural land use of Darjeeling district using AHP and GIS techniques , 2016, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment.

[17]  George Galanis,et al.  Multi-criteria site selection for offshore renewable energy platforms , 2016 .

[18]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[19]  Zarei Morteza,et al.  Selection of the optimal tourism site using the ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS in the framework of Integrated Coastal Zone Management: A case of Qeshm Island , 2016 .

[20]  C. Craig,et al.  Formulating Retail Location Strategy in a Changing Environment , 1983 .

[21]  Ümran Şengül,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey , 2015 .

[22]  Ángel Alberto Magreñán,et al.  Decision model for siting transport and logistic facilities in urban environments: A methodological approach , 2016, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[23]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method , 1982 .

[24]  Michael J. Gaffney,et al.  Biorefinery site selection using a stepwise biogeophysical and social analysis approach , 2017 .

[25]  Mehri Davtalab,et al.  Site selection for installing plasma incinerator reactor using the GIS in Rudsar county, Iran , 2016, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[26]  Muhammad Ashraf Shaheen,et al.  A method of data mining for selection of site for wind turbines , 2016 .

[27]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Haobo Zhang,et al.  A cloud decision framework in pure 2-tuple linguistic setting and its application for low-speed wind farm site selection , 2017 .

[29]  Aleksandar Rikalovic,et al.  GIS Based Multi-Criteria Analysis for Industrial Site Selection , 2014 .

[30]  C. Pae Why Systematic Review rather than Narrative Review? , 2015, Psychiatry investigation.

[31]  Tsung-Cheng Wang The interactive trade decision-making research: An application case of novel hybrid MCDM model , 2012 .

[32]  Sepideh Karimi,et al.  Optimization solar site selection by fuzzy logic model and weighted linear combination method in arid and semi-arid region: A case study Isfahan-IRAN , 2017 .

[33]  Ashish Trivedi,et al.  A hybrid multi-objective decision model for emergency shelter location-relocation projects using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and goal programming approach , 2017 .

[34]  Seyed Ali Jozi,et al.  Application of Multi Criteria Decision-Making Technique in Site Selection of Wind Farm- a Case Study of Northwestern Iran , 2016, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing.

[35]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Potential zones identification for harvesting wind energy resources in desert region of India – A multi criteria evaluation approach using remote sensing and GIS , 2016 .

[36]  Li-Fei Chen,et al.  Data mining framework based on rough set theory to improve location selection decisions: A case study of a restaurant chain , 2016 .

[37]  Gül Tekin Temur A novel multi attribute decision making approach for location decision under high uncertainty , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[38]  C. Hwang,et al.  TOPSIS for MODM , 1994 .

[39]  Aicha Aguezzoul,et al.  Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods , 2014 .

[40]  Mohammad Reza Mohammadi,et al.  Multi-criteria decision support system for wind farm site selection using GIS , 2016 .

[41]  Reza Maknoon,et al.  Modeling landfill site selection by multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy functions in GIS, case study: Shabestar, Iran , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[42]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[43]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods , 2014 .

[44]  Jeong-Il Park,et al.  Offshore wind farm site selection study around Jeju Island, South Korea , 2016 .

[45]  Glin Bykzkan,et al.  Application of a new combined intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM approach based on axiomatic design methodology for the supplier selection problem , 2017 .

[46]  Branko Vucijak,et al.  Multicriteria decision making in selecting best solid waste management scenario: a municipal case study from Bosnia and Herzegovina , 2016 .

[47]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis , 2008 .

[48]  Manish Pal,et al.  Development of the location suitability index for wave energy production by ANN and MCDM techniques , 2016 .

[49]  P. Kayastha,et al.  Application of an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the GIS interface for suitable fire site selection: A case study from Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal , 2016 .

[50]  Jhong-you Huang,et al.  Application of Big Data and Analytic Network Process for the Adaptive Reuse Strategies of School Land , 2018, Social Indicators Research.

[51]  Eren Özceylan,et al.  GIS-based fuzzy MCDA approach for siting refugee camp: A case study for southeastern Turkey , 2016 .

[52]  J. Zotti,et al.  Policies for a More Dematerialized EU Economy: Theoretical Underpinnings, Political Context and Expected Feasibility , 2016 .

[53]  Aleksandras Krylovas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making KEMIRA-M method for solution of location alternatives , 2016 .

[54]  Ali Akbar Babaei,et al.  Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran , 2016, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering.

[55]  Ankur Chauhan,et al.  A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method approach for selecting a sustainable location of healthcare waste disposal facility , 2016 .

[56]  Xinyi Dai Dam site selection using an integrated method of AHP and GIS for decision making support in Bortala, Northwest China , 2016 .

[57]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[58]  Satish Kumar,et al.  A GIS-based methodology for safe site selection of a building in a hilly region , 2016 .

[59]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Developing a novel risk-based methodology for multi-criteria decision making in marine renewable energy applications , 2017 .

[60]  Chang-Chun Lin,et al.  An enhanced goal programming method for generating priority vectors , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[61]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: A case study of Vojvodina, Serbia , 2017 .

[62]  Jean-François Balmat,et al.  A decision-making system to maritime risk assessment , 2011 .

[63]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings , 2004 .

[64]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples , 1968 .

[65]  Hassan Z. Al-Garni,et al.  A fuzzy AHP and GIS-based approach to prioritize utility-scale solar PV sites in Saudi Arabia , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[66]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[67]  Ozalp Vayvay,et al.  Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey , 2017 .

[68]  G. Crawford,et al.  A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices , 1985 .