Interpersonal spacing behavior between surrounding nearest neighbors reflects both familiarity and environmental density

Abstract Patterns of proxemic behavior were studied in casual groups within public environments. Observations were made in the corridors of large shopping malls and on sidewalks in small towns. In walking and sitting groups, social distances between surrounding neighbors and the sizes of casual groups were measured from photographs or maps. A similar group spatial pattern was found during both walking and sitting: individuals aggregated significantly with their 1st, 2nd, and 3rd nearest companions, while avoiding proximity to or maintaining random distances toward 1st, 2nd, or 3rd nearest strangers. Companions in these groups always maintained closer social distances toward each other than toward strangers. Distances between walking companions were inversely correlated with density, but distances to strangers were independent of density. The resulting subgroups were larger in size than some groups previously observed in comparable environments. The results are contrasted with naturally-occurring proxemic behavior observed in the groups of nonhuman primates and other social animals, and are discussed in the context of ecological pressures favoring social spacing responses.

[1]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Social Behaviour in Birds and Mammals , 1972 .

[2]  F. N. David,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics. , 1961 .

[3]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  J. H. Torrie,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York Toronto London. , 1960 .

[5]  M J Horowitz,et al.  SPATIAL BEHAVIOR AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY , 1968, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[6]  J. Burgess Development of social spacing in normal and mentally retarded children , 1981 .

[7]  R. Sommer,et al.  Body image and self-concept in schizophrenia. An experimental study. , 1960, The Journal of mental science.

[8]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[9]  P. F. Major PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS IN SCHOOLING FISHES DURING PERIODS OF TWILIGHT: A STUDY OF THE SILVERSIDE PRANESUS INSULARUM IN HAWAll 1 , 1977 .

[10]  J. Richer The social-avoidance behaviour of autistic children , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  D. Stokols On the distinction between density and crowding: some implications for future research. , 1972, Psychological review.

[12]  M. Dosey,et al.  Personal space and self-protection. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Burgess Social group spacing of rhesus macaque troops (Macaca mulatta) in outdoor enclosures: environmental effects. , 1980, Behavioral and neural biology.

[14]  C. Loo The Effects of Spatial Density on the Social Behavior of Children1 , 1972 .

[15]  M. D. McGinn,et al.  Early development of spiny neurons in fish and mouse: morphometric measures of dendritic spine formation pattern. , 1982, Brain research.

[16]  J. Coleman Introduction to Mathematical Sociology , 1965 .

[17]  L. C. Katz,et al.  Structure and mechanisms of schooling intadpoles of the clawed frog, Xenopus laevis , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  J. Burgess,et al.  The development of proxemic spacing behavior: children's distances to surrounding playmates and adults change between 6 months and 5 years of age. , 1982, Developmental psychobiology.

[19]  Roger Carlson,et al.  The development of personal space in primary school children , 1979 .

[20]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  The Size of Informal Groups in Public , 1974 .

[21]  Robert H. Riffenburgh,et al.  Fish Schooling: A Possible Factor in Reducing Predation , 1960 .

[22]  J. C. Francis Macmillan's magazine' , 1910 .

[23]  H. S. Horn,et al.  The Adaptive Significance of Colonial Nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird (Euphagus Cyanocephalus) , 1968 .

[24]  Peter N. Witt,et al.  Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance , 1982 .

[25]  J. W. Burgess,et al.  Measurement of spatial behavior: methodology applied to rhesus monkeys, neon tetras, communal and solitary spiders, cockroaches, and gnats in open fields. , 1979, Behavioral and neural biology.

[26]  J. James A Preliminary Study of the Size Determinant in Small Group Interaction , 1951 .

[27]  M. J. Horowitz,et al.  BODY-BUFFER ZONE; EXPLORATION OF PERSONAL SPACE. , 1964, Archives of general psychiatry.

[28]  H. Hediger,et al.  Wild animals in captivity , 1950 .

[29]  R. Sommer Studies in Personal space , 1959 .

[30]  L. Hayduk,et al.  Personal Space: An Evaluative and Orienting Overview. , 1978 .

[31]  J. Baxter Interpersonal spacing in natural settings. , 1970, Sociometry.

[32]  R. C. Schmitt Density, Health, and Social Disorganization , 1966 .

[33]  T. M. Ciolek,et al.  Environment and the Spatial Arrangement of Conversational Encounters , 1980 .

[34]  C. Carpenter Naturalistic behavior of nonhuman primates , 1964 .

[35]  R. Coss,et al.  Jewel fish retain juvenile schooling pattern after crowded development. , 1981, Developmental psychobiology.

[36]  P. Games A three-factor model encompassing many possible statistical tests on independent groups. , 1978 .

[37]  Robert D. Campbell,et al.  Man-Environment Systems. , 1974 .

[38]  C. Hutt,et al.  Differential Effects of Group Density on Social Behaviour , 1966, Nature.

[39]  J. W. Burgess,et al.  Territorial Aggregation: An Ecological Spacing Strategy in Acorn Woodpeckers , 1982 .

[40]  R. Sommer The End Of Imprisonment , 1976 .

[41]  Wolfstein,et al.  JOURNAL OF MENTAL SCIENCE , 1905 .

[42]  H. Thompson Distribution of Distance to Nth Neighbour in a Population of Randomly Distributed Individuals , 1956 .

[43]  John James,et al.  The Distribution of Free-Forming Small Group Size , 1953 .

[44]  E. Shaw,et al.  Effects of acoustico-lateralis denervation in a facultative schooling fish: a nearest-neighbor matrix analysis. , 1981, Behavioral and neural biology.