Interfering trajectories in experimental quantum-enhanced stochastic simulation

Simulations of stochastic processes play an important role in the quantitative sciences, enabling the characterisation of complex systems. Recent work has established a quantum advantage in stochastic simulation, leading to quantum devices that execute a simulation using less memory than possible by classical means. To realise this advantage it is essential that the memory register remains coherent, and coherently interacts with the processor, allowing the simulator to operate over many time steps. Here we report a multi-time-step experimental simulation of a stochastic process using less memory than the classical limit. A key feature of the photonic quantum information processor is that it creates a quantum superposition of all possible future trajectories that the system can evolve into. This superposition allows us to introduce, and demonstrate, the idea of comparing statistical futures of two classical processes via quantum interference. We demonstrate interference of two 16-dimensional quantum states, representing statistical futures of our process, with a visibility of 0.96 ± 0.02.Quantum devices should allow simulating stochastic processes using less memory than classical counterparts, but only if quantum coherence is maintained through multiple steps. Here, the authors demonstrate a coherence-preserving three-step stochastic simulation using photons.

[1]  Young,et al.  Inferring statistical complexity. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[2]  Shai Ben-David,et al.  Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms , 2014 .

[3]  Juan Miguel Arrazola,et al.  Experimental quantum fingerprinting with weak coherent pulses , 2015, Nature Communications.

[4]  Paul G. Kwiat,et al.  Hyperentangled Bell-state analysis , 2007 .

[5]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit , 2004, Science.

[6]  Johannes Kofler,et al.  Experimental violation of a Bell inequality with two different degrees of freedom of entangled particle pairs , 2009, 0904.3245.

[7]  Nathan K Langford,et al.  Generation of hyperentangled photon pairs. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[8]  Tzu-Chieh Wei,et al.  Remote preparation of single-photon "hybrid" entangled and vector-polarization States. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[9]  James Odell,et al.  Between order and chaos , 2011, Nature Physics.

[10]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2011 .

[11]  Peter Grassberger,et al.  Complexity of Forecasting in a Class of Simple Models , 1988, Complex Syst..

[12]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[13]  Pedro Chamorro-Posada,et al.  swap test and Hong-Ou-Mandel effect are equivalent , 2013, 1303.6814.

[14]  M. S. Kim,et al.  Large scale quantum walks by means of optical fiber cavities , 2016, 1607.00891.

[15]  Hyang-Tag Lim,et al.  Experimental realization of a delayed-choice quantum walk , 2013, Nature Communications.

[16]  Yasuhiko Arakawa,et al.  Quantum key distribution over 120 km using ultrahigh purity single-photon source and superconducting single-photon detectors , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[17]  S. Takeuchi Experimental demonstration of a three-qubit quantum computation algorithm using a single photon and linear optics , 2000 .

[18]  James P Crutchfield,et al.  Time's barbed arrow: irreversibility, crypticity, and stored information. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[19]  C. Saavedra,et al.  Interference and complementarity for two-photon hybrid entangled states , 2010 .

[20]  Fabio Sciarrino,et al.  Testing sequential quantum measurements: how can maximal knowledge be extracted? , 2011, Scientific Reports.

[21]  J. Crutchfield The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction , 1994 .

[22]  H. Wiseman,et al.  Observing the ambiguity of simplicity via quantum simulations of an Ising spin chain , 2017, 1711.03661.

[23]  S. Walborn,et al.  Hyperentanglement-assisted Bell-state analysis , 2003, quant-ph/0307212.

[24]  Mile Gu,et al.  Dimensional Quantum Memory Advantage in the Simulation of Stochastic Processes , 2018, Physical Review X.

[25]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Occam’s Quantum Strop: Synchronizing and Compressing Classical Cryptic Processes via a Quantum Channel , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[26]  V. Verma,et al.  Unconditional violation of the shot-noise limit in photonic quantum metrology , 2017, 1707.08977.

[27]  P. Grassberger Toward a quantitative theory of self-generated complexity , 1986 .

[28]  A Schreiber,et al.  Photons walking the line: a quantum walk with adjustable coin operations. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[29]  Niraj Kumar,et al.  Efficient quantum communications with coherent state fingerprints , 2017 .

[30]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Universal Quantum Simulators , 1996, Science.

[31]  A. Schreiber,et al.  A 2D Quantum Walk Simulation of Two-Particle Dynamics , 2012, Science.

[32]  Fabio Sciarrino,et al.  Generation of tunable entanglement and violation of a Bell-like inequality between different degrees of freedom of a single photon , 2014, 1407.0144.

[33]  Paul G. Kwiat,et al.  Hyper-entangled states , 1997 .

[34]  Howard M Wiseman,et al.  Experimentally modeling stochastic processes with less memory by the use of a quantum processor , 2017, Science Advances.

[35]  F. Sciarrino,et al.  Generation of hybrid polarization-orbital angular momentum entangled states. , 2010, Optics express.

[36]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  High-visibility interference in a Bell-inequality experiment for energy and time. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[37]  Franson,et al.  Bell inequality for position and time. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[38]  Andrew Forbes,et al.  Engineering two-photon high-dimensional states through quantum interference , 2016, Science Advances.

[39]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[40]  Karoline Wiesner,et al.  Quantum mechanics can reduce the complexity of classical models , 2011, Nature Communications.

[41]  Adetunmise C. Dada,et al.  Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities , 2011, 1104.5087.

[42]  Mauro Paternostro,et al.  Linear Optics Simulation of Quantum Non-Markovian Dynamics , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[43]  M. Gu,et al.  Practical Unitary Simulator for Non-Markovian Complex Processes. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[44]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Computational Mechanics: Pattern and Prediction, Structure and Simplicity , 1999, ArXiv.