Exemplar similarity and rule application
暂无分享,去创建一个
Emmanuel M. Pothos | Ulrike Hahn | Duncan P. Brumby | Mercè Prat-Sala | U. Hahn | E. Pothos | M. Prat-Sala
[1] M. Behrmann,et al. Selective attention to the parts of an object , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[2] T. B. Ward. Response tempo and separable--integral responding: evidence for an integral-to-separable processing sequence in visual perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3] P. McLeod,et al. Movement and Proximity Constrain Miscombinations of Colour and Form , 1992, Perception.
[4] G. Logan. Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .
[5] L. Brooks,et al. Specializing the operation of an explicit rule , 1991 .
[6] B. Scholl. Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.
[7] ROBERT S. MOYER,et al. Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.
[8] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .
[9] N Lavie,et al. On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[10] R. Nosofsky,et al. A rule-plus-exception model for classifying objects in continuous-dimension spaces , 1998 .
[11] J. P. Minda,et al. Straight talk about linear separability , 1997 .
[12] L. Smith. Importance of the overall similarity of objects of adults' and children's classifications. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] I. Mclaren,et al. Generalization in Human Category Learning: A Connectionist Account of Differences in Gradient after Discriminative and Non discriminative Training , 1997 .
[14] Gregory Ashby,et al. A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.
[15] Aaron B. Hoffman,et al. Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[16] Garrison W. Cottrell,et al. Modeling Interference Effects In Instructed Category Learning , 1996 .
[17] John R. Anderson,et al. A hybrid model of categorization , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[18] L. Brooks,et al. Category organization in free classification: The organizing effect of an array of stimuli. , 1995 .
[19] J. Kruschke,et al. Rules and exemplars in category learning. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[20] Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al. Dynamic Interaction of Object- and Space-Based Attention in Retinotopic Visual Areas , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[21] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.
[22] Irene Reppa,et al. The modulation of inhibition of return by objectinternal structure: Implications for theories of object-based attentional selection , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[23] F. Keil,et al. Two dogmas of conceptual empiricism: implications for hybrid models of the structure of knowledge , 1998, Cognition.
[24] Thomas G. Dietterich. What is machine learning? , 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood.
[25] D. Shanks,et al. FEATURE- AND RULE-BASED GENERALIZATION IN HUMAN ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING , 1998 .
[26] Allen W Ingling,et al. Separating perceptual and decisional attention processes in the identification and categorization of integral-dimension stimuli. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] N. P. Bichot,et al. Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[28] R. Nosofsky,et al. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.
[29] R D Thomas,et al. Learning correlations in categorization tasks using large, ill-defined categories. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[30] Woo-Kyoung Ahn,et al. A Two-Stage Model of Category Construction , 1992, Cogn. Sci..
[31] E. Rothkopf,et al. Particularization: Inductive speeding of rule-governed decisions by narrow application experience. , 1995 .
[32] R. Nosofsky,et al. Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[33] Nick Chater,et al. The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] J M Wolfe,et al. Part—whole information is useful in visual search for size × size but not orientation × orientation conjunctions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[35] Mark R. Blair,et al. Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning , 2009, Cognition.
[36] J. D. Smith,et al. Prototypes in the Mist: The Early Epochs of Category Learning , 1998 .
[37] A. Vandierendonck,et al. A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[38] Rule‐Based Thought , 2006 .
[39] J. D. Smith,et al. Overall similarity in adults' classification: The child in all of us. , 1984 .
[40] Mark K. Johansen,et al. Are there representational shifts during category learning? , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[41] S. Palmer. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[42] C. Eriksen,et al. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .
[43] M. Posner,et al. Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.
[44] Nick Chater,et al. A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization , 2002, Cogn. Sci..
[45] Colin M. Macleod. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.
[46] D. Medin,et al. Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.
[47] B. Ross,et al. Reminding-based category learning , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.
[48] R. Nosofsky. Similarity, frequency, and category representations. , 1988 .
[49] J. Ridley. Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .
[50] Lynn Nadel,et al. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science , 2003 .
[51] J. Driver,et al. Target--distractor separation and feature integration in visual attention to letters. , 1991, Acta psychologica.
[52] Henrik Olsson,et al. Exemplars, prototypes, and the flexibility of classification models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[53] W. T. Maddox,et al. Multiple attention systems in perceptual categorization , 2002, Memory & cognition.
[54] P. Juslin,et al. Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[55] S. Yantis,et al. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[56] Jonathan R. Folstein,et al. Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli. , 2008, Psychophysiology.
[57] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.
[58] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[59] J R Simon,et al. Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.
[60] Edward E. Smith,et al. Alternative strategies of categorization , 1998, Cognition.
[61] John R. Anderson,et al. The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[62] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Visual Attention , 2020, Computational Models for Cognitive Vision.
[63] E. Goldstein. Blackwell handbook of perception , 2001 .
[64] J. Duncan. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[65] Kevin J. Hawley,et al. Attention capture by novel stimuli. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[66] N. Chater,et al. Rational models of cognition , 1998 .
[67] T. B. Ward,et al. Analytic and holistic modes of learning family-resemblance concepts , 1987, Memory & cognition.
[68] Gordon D. Logan,et al. What Is Learned During Automatization? The Role of Attention in Constructing an Instance , 1994 .
[69] L R Brooks,et al. Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: the priority of holistic individuation. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[70] Lee R Brooks,et al. Instantiated features and the use of "rules.". , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[71] Allen Allport,et al. Visual attention , 1989 .
[72] A. Markman,et al. Category use and category learning. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.
[73] Nick Chater,et al. Understanding Similarity: A Joint Project for Psychology, Case-Based Reasoning, and Law , 1998, Artificial Intelligence Review.
[74] M Behrmann,et al. Attending to the parts of a single object: Part-based selection limitations , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[75] K. Lamberts. Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. , 2000, Psychological review.
[76] E. Rothkopf,et al. Aggregation in memory of episodic influences on rule-guided decisions. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[77] Jacob Feldman,et al. Visual comparisons within and between object parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect , 2003, Vision Research.
[78] W. D. Wattenmaker,et al. Relational properties and memory-based category construction. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[79] S. Sloman. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .
[80] J. Thibaut,et al. Exemplar effects in the context of a categorization rule: Featural and holistic influences. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[81] R. Snowden,et al. Texture segregation and visual search: a comparison of the effects of random variations along irrelevant dimensions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[82] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[83] Serge Larochelle,et al. The origin of exemplar effects in rule-driven categorization. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[84] D. Broadbent. Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.
[85] I. Reppa,et al. The modulation of inhibition of return by object internal structure : implications for theories of object-based attention and object shape representation. , 2002 .
[86] Andrew Heathcote,et al. Repealing the power law: the case for an exponential law of practice , 2000 .
[87] R. Rosenthal. Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .
[88] Mark K. Johansen,et al. Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[89] Alexander B. Bilsky,et al. Parallel processing of park-whole information in visual search tasks , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[90] Koen Lamberts,et al. Categorization under time pressure. , 1995 .
[91] M. Kalish,et al. Decision boundaries in one-dimensional categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[92] Aaron B. Hoffman,et al. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.
[93] Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al. Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .
[94] T. Palmeri. Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[95] L. Brooks,et al. Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[96] J S Lappin,et al. Attention in the identification of stimuli in complex visual displays. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.
[97] Padraic Monaghan,et al. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2001 .
[98] G. Baylis,et al. Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[99] I. Rock,et al. Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.
[100] Ulrike Hahn,et al. Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning , 1995 .
[101] N. Chater,et al. Similarity and rules: distinct? exhaustive? empirically distinguishable? , 1998, Cognition.
[102] Douglas L. Medin,et al. A two-stage model of category construction ☆ , 1992 .
[103] W. R. Garner,et al. DISCRIMINABILITY AND PREFERENCE FOR ATTRIBUTES IN FREE AND CONSTRAINED CLASSIFICATION. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.
[104] W T Maddox,et al. Separating perceptual processes from decisional processes in identification and categorization , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[105] A. Kramer,et al. Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[106] Douglas L. Medin,et al. Relationships between item and category learning: Evidence that abstraction is not automatic , 1983 .
[107] S. Palmer. Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .
[108] E. Pothos. The rules versus similarity distinction. , 2005, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[109] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .
[110] W. Johnston,et al. Attention capture by novel stimuli. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[111] L. Brooks,et al. Producing biased diagnoses with unambiguous stimuli: The importance of feature instantiations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[112] G. Chastain,et al. Analog versus discrete shifts of attention across the visual field , 1992, Psychological research.