A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings

Abstract The paper presents a comparison between two different rating systems to evaluate buildings sustainability: LEED (USA) and ITACA (Italy), thanks to the application of both methods to two residential buildings located in Italy. The LEED green building rating system encourages an integrated design approach, with a points scheme that allots credits for building design features deemed to improve sustainability, which includes reductions in energy use, improvements in indoor environment quality, protection of the construction site, reduction in water consumption and use of sustainable materials. ITACA procedure, the environmental quality rating system adopted in Italy, consists of the compilation of a group of worksheets, one for each different performance indicator, at the aim of describing the building environmental quality, including the maintenance of indoor comfort during the entire life cycle. The chosen buildings are located in central Italy; they are both energy efficient and designed according to the principles of bioclimatic architecture, even if they are characterized by different features. Five common areas (site, water, energy, materials, indoor environmental quality) were identified in order to compare the two methods and to normalize their score; this original approach can be transferred also to the comparison of other building environmental assessment tools. The comparison allows to prove the main features of both schemes. Even though the two procedures give different importance to the various areas, the analysis show a proportionality between the respective normalized final score for the two examined buildings.

[1]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Double skin facades for warm climate regions : Analysis of a solution with an integrated movable shading system , 2009 .

[2]  John H. Scofield,et al.  Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Not really… , 2009 .

[3]  Francesco Asdrubali,et al.  Comparative study of energy regulations for buildings in Italy and Spain , 2008 .

[4]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Theoretical modelling and experimental evaluation of the optical properties of glazing systems with selective films , 2009 .

[5]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland , 2010 .

[6]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Energy and environmental performance optimization of a wooden window: A holistic approach , 2014 .

[7]  Antonio Pietro Francesco Andaloro,et al.  Energy certification of buildings: A comparative analysis of progress towards implementation in European countries , 2010 .

[8]  Ruffina Thilakaratne,et al.  Is LEED Leading Asia?: an Analysis of Global Adaptation and Trends , 2011 .

[9]  T. Muneer,et al.  Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland , 2007 .

[10]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings , 2013 .

[11]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings , 2013 .

[12]  J. Kurnitski,et al.  Building sustainability objective assessment in Estonian context and a comparative evaluation with LEED and BREEAM , 2014 .

[13]  Anna Forsberg,et al.  Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment , 2004 .

[14]  John Burnett,et al.  Benchmarking energy use assessment of HK-BEAM, BREEAM and LEED , 2008 .

[15]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review of benchmarking, rating and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes , 2009 .

[16]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[17]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[18]  Hikmat H. Ali,et al.  Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan , 2009 .

[19]  F. Asdrubali,et al.  Influence of new fac tors on global energy prospects in the medium term: compar ison among the 2010, 2011 and 2012 editions of the IEA’s World Energy Outlook reports , 2014 .

[20]  Khaled Galal,et al.  Integrated LCA–LEED sustainability assessment model for structure and envelope systems of school buildings , 2014 .

[21]  Paulo Santos,et al.  A macro-component approach for the assessment of building sustainability in early stages of design , 2014 .