Organizational practices and workplace health and safety: A cross-sectional study in manufacturing companies

Abstract We report the results of a mail questionnaire for 312 manufacturing firms in the province of Ontario (Canada). We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of workplace level health and safety policies, practices and attitudes. Analyses were conducted across firm categories based upon lost-time frequency rate (LTFR) data. Lower LTFRs were associated with paternalistic initiatives, recording of occupational health and safety (OHS) measures, greater involvement of workers in decision-making, and better managerial attitudes concerning the importance of OHS. The composition of the Joint Health and Safety Committee (JHSC), a committee mandated in all workplaces we sampled, differed according to injury rate: the mean number of worker (vs. management) members on the JHSC was higher for lower injury sites, and the mean number of worker members attending JHSC meetings was also higher for lower injury worksites. In addition, workplaces with lower LTFR benefitted by having JHSCs with more executive functions and greater worker involvement. In conclusion, managerial and worker participation in OHS initiatives characterizes safer workplaces. Also, general concern of management towards OHS—illustrated by both attitudes and concrete actions—is also associated with lower injury rates.

[1]  Harry S. Shannon,et al.  Overview of the relationship between organizational and workplace factors and injury rates , 1997 .

[2]  Geoffrey R. Norman,et al.  Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials , 1993 .

[3]  L R Murphy,et al.  Hospital safety climate and its relationship with safe work practices and workplace exposure incidents. , 2000, American journal of infection control.

[4]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Occupational injury : risk, prevention and intervention , 1998 .

[5]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Site managers and safety leadership in the offshore oil and gas industry , 2001 .

[6]  Andrew R.Hale and Jan Hovden,et al.  Management and culture: the third age of safety. A review of approaches to organizational aspects of safety, health and environment , 1998 .

[7]  Fong Chan,et al.  Employer Factors Related to Workers' Compensation Claims and Disability Management , 1991 .

[8]  Alison G Vredenburgh,et al.  Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[9]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  H S Shannon,et al.  How low can they go? Potential for reduction in work injury rates , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[11]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[12]  Robert B. Keller,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Organizational Behaviors on Work Disability Prevention and Management , 2000, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[13]  H S Shannon,et al.  Workplace organizational correlates of lost-time accident rates in manufacturing. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[14]  G. Lowe,et al.  How many injured workers do not file claims for workers' compensation benefits? , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[15]  H. Shannon,et al.  Have companies improved their health and safety approaches over the last decade? A longitudinal study. , 2005, American journal of industrial medicine.