Genomic Research Data Generation, Analysis and Sharing - Challenges in the African Setting

Genomics is the study of the genetic material that constitutes the genomes of organisms. This genetic material can be sequenced and it provides a powerful tool for the study of human, plant and animal evolutionary history and diseases. Genomics research is becoming increasingly commonplace due to significant advances in and reducing costs of technologies such as sequencing. This has led to new challenges including increasing cost and complexity of data. There is, therefore, an increasing need for computing infrastructure and skills to manage, store, analyze and interpret the data. In addition, there is a significant cost associated with recruitment of participants and collection and processing of biological samples, particularly for large human genetics studies on specific diseases. As a result, researchers are often reluctant to share the data due to the effort and associated cost. In Africa, where researchers are most commonly at the study recruitment, determination of phenotypes and collection of biological samples end of the genomic research spectrum, rather than the generation of genomic data, data sharing without adequate safeguards for the interests of the primary data generators is a concern. There are substantial ethical considerations in the sharing of human genomics data. The broad consent for data sharing preferred by genomics researchers and funders does not necessarily align with the expectations of researchers, research participants, legal authorities and bioethicists. In Africa, this is complicated by concerns about comprehension of genomics research studies, quality of research ethics reviews and understanding of the implications of broad consent, secondary analyses of shared data, return of results and incidental findings. Additional challenges with genomics research in Africa include the inability to transfer, store, process and analyze large-scale genomics data on the continent, because this requires highly specialized skills and expensive computing infrastructure which are often unavailable. Recently initiatives such as H3Africa and H3ABioNet which aim to build capacity for large-scale genomics projects in Africa have emerged. Here we describe such initiatives, including the challenges faced in the generation, analysis and sharing of genomic data and how these challenges are being overcome.

[1]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Beyond the digital divide: Towards a situated approach to open data , 2017 .

[2]  P. Tindana,et al.  Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries , 2017, BMC Medical Ethics.

[3]  P. Tindana,et al.  Broad Consent for Genomic Research and Biobanking: Perspectives from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. , 2016, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[4]  A. Thorogood,et al.  Who should have access to genomic data and how should they be held accountable? Perspectives of Data Access Committee members and experts , 2016, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[5]  J. Seeley,et al.  Evolving perspectives on broad consent for genomics research and biobanking in Africa. Report of the Second H3Africa Ethics Consultation Meeting, 11 May 2015 , 2016, Global health, epidemiology and genomics.

[6]  J. McPherson,et al.  Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[7]  O. Olopade,et al.  Building local capacity for genomics research in Africa: recommendations from analysis of publications in Sub-Saharan Africa from 2004 to 2013 , 2016, Global health action.

[8]  R. Akinyemi,et al.  Stroke Investigative Research and Education Network , 2016, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[9]  Özlem Tastan Bishop,et al.  H3ABioNet, a sustainable pan-African bioinformatics network for human heredity and health in Africa , 2016, Genome research.

[10]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  Adapting bioinformatics curricula for big data , 2015, Briefings Bioinform..

[11]  D. Stein,et al.  Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents , 2015, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[12]  M. Schatz,et al.  Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? , 2015, PLoS biology.

[13]  S. Denny,et al.  Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings , 2015, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[14]  S. Bull,et al.  Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research , 2015, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[15]  O. Doumbo,et al.  Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali , 2015, BMC Medical Ethics.

[16]  Thomas K. Karikari,et al.  Neurogenomics: An opportunity to integrate neuroscience, genomics and bioinformatics research in Africa , 2015, Applied & translational genomics.

[17]  The future of genomic medicine education in Africa , 2015, Genome Medicine.

[18]  P. Marshall,et al.  Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature , 2015, BMC medical ethics.

[19]  S. Goodman Clinical Trial Data Sharing: What Do We Do Now? , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  Ebony B. Madden,et al.  Addressing ethical issues in H3Africa research – the views of research ethics committee members , 2015, The HUGO Journal.

[21]  C. Rotimi,et al.  The H3Africa policy framework: negotiating fairness in genomics , 2015, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[22]  Gary W Miller,et al.  Data sharing in toxicology: beyond show and tell. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[23]  J. Grefenstette,et al.  A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[24]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Adam R Ferguson,et al.  Big data from small data: data-sharing in the 'long tail' of neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Adeyemo,et al.  Informed consent and ethical re-use of African genomic data , 2014, Human Genomics.

[27]  S. Bull,et al.  Ethical issues in the export, storage and reuse of human biological samples in biomedical research: perspectives of key stakeholders in Ghana and Kenya , 2014, BMC medical ethics.

[28]  Peter N Robinson,et al.  Genomic data sharing for translational research and diagnostics , 2014, Genome Medicine.

[29]  M. Ramsay,et al.  Ethical issues in genomic research on the African continent: experiences and challenges to ethics review committees , 2014, Human Genomics.

[30]  D. Kwiatkowski,et al.  Knowing who to trust: exploring the role of ‘ethical metadata’ in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa , 2014, BMC medical ethics.

[31]  K. Hemminki,et al.  Overview on health research ethics in Egypt and North Africa. , 2014, European journal of public health.

[32]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Research Capacity: Enabling African Scientists to Engage Fully in the Genomic Revolution , 2014 .

[33]  Faisal M. Fadlelmola,et al.  Enabling Genomic Revolution in Africa , 2019, The Genetics of African Populations in Health and Disease.

[34]  C. Rotimi,et al.  Voluntary participation and comprehension of informed consent in a genetic epidemiological study of breast cancer in Nigeria , 2014, BMC medical ethics.

[35]  Kimberley D. Lakes,et al.  Community Member and Faith Leader Perspectives on the Process of Building Trusting Relationships between Communities and Researchers , 2014, Clinical and translational science.

[36]  T. Hifnawy,et al.  Applying Ethical Guidelines in Clinical Researches among Academic Medical Staff: An Experience from South Egypt , 2014 .

[37]  Tien-Shang Huang,et al.  To evaluate the effectiveness of health care ethics consultation based on the goals of health care ethics consultation: a prospective cohort study with randomization , 2014, BMC medical ethics.

[38]  M. Feldman,et al.  On the stability of the Bayenv method in assessing human SNP-environment associations , 2014, Human Genomics.

[39]  Stephanie A. Morris,et al.  caNanoLab: data sharing to expedite the use of nanotechnology in biomedicine. , 2013, Computational science & discovery.

[40]  K. Moodley,et al.  Challenges in biobank governance in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2013, BMC medical ethics.

[41]  A. Adeyemo,et al.  Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations , 2013, BMC medical ethics.

[42]  A. Brazma,et al.  Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[43]  Eran Halperin,et al.  Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference , 2013, Science.

[44]  S. Bull,et al.  Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: A qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience , 2012, BMC Medical Ethics.

[45]  L. Rozmovits,et al.  Aligning community engagement with traditional authority structures in global health research: a case study from northern Ghana. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[46]  Michèle Ramsay,et al.  Africa: the next frontier for human disease gene discovery? , 2011, Human molecular genetics.

[47]  M. Pepper,et al.  Pharmacogenomic Research in South Africa: Lessons Learned and Future Opportunities in the Rainbow Nation , 2011, Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.

[48]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[49]  Ian T. Foster,et al.  Globus Online: Accelerating and Democratizing Science through Cloud-Based Services , 2011, IEEE Internet Computing.

[50]  Michael Parker,et al.  Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries , 2011, BMC medical ethics.

[51]  A. McGuire,et al.  Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. , 2010, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[52]  C. AbouZahr,et al.  Sharing health data: good intentions are not enough. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[53]  Tom H. Pringle,et al.  Complete Khoisan and Bantu genomes from southern Africa , 2010, Nature.

[54]  Scott M. Williams,et al.  The Genetic Structure and History of Africans and African Americans , 2009, Science.

[55]  W. Kilama,et al.  Composition, training needs and independence of ethics review committees across Africa: are the gate-keepers rising to the emerging challenges? , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[56]  S. Tishkoff,et al.  Genetic structure in African populations: implications for human demographic history. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[57]  A. Daar,et al.  South Africa: from species cradle to genomic applications , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[58]  Ludivine A. Thomas,et al.  Proteomics in South Africa: current status, challenges and prospects. , 2008, Biotechnology journal.

[59]  S. Nelson,et al.  Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping Microarrays , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[60]  John D. Van Horn,et al.  Domain-Specific Data Sharing in Neuroscience: What Do We Have to Learn from Each Other? , 2008, Neuroinformatics.

[61]  C. Coleman,et al.  How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review , 2008, BMC medical ethics.

[62]  M. Kruger,et al.  Health research ethics review and needs of institutional ethics committees in Tanzania. , 2008, Tanzania health research bulletin.

[63]  M. Leppert,et al.  Community Engagement and Informed Consent in the International HapMap Project , 2007, Public Health Genomics.

[64]  D. Kwiatkowski,et al.  Valid Consent for Genomic Epidemiology in Developing Countries , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[65]  A. Hyder,et al.  The Structure and Function of Research Ethics Committees in Africa: A Case Study , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[66]  M. Kruger,et al.  Health research ethics and needs of institutional ethics committees in Tanzania , 2007 .

[67]  D. Kwiatkowski,et al.  Data sharing and intellectual property in a genomic epidemiology network: policies for large-scale research collaboration. , 2006, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[68]  C. Wambebe,et al.  Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region , 2005, BMC medical ethics.

[69]  Douglas K. Martin,et al.  South Africa—blazing a trail for African biotechnology , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[70]  Ada Hamosh,et al.  Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. , 2003, JAMA.

[71]  C Rayner,et al.  Informed consent. , 2000, British journal of plastic surgery.