Evaluating Environmental Programs: The Perspective of Modern Evaluation Research

Large-scale environmental programs generally commit substantial societal resources, making the evaluation of their actual effects on the relevant outcomes imperative. As the example of the subsidization of energy-saving appliances illustrates, much of the applied environmental economics literature has yet to confront the problem of proper attribution of effects to underlying causes on a convincing methodological basis. This paper argues that recent results in the econometrics and statistics literature on program evaluation could be utilized to advance considerably in this context. In particular, the construction of a credible counterfactual situation is at the heart of the formal statistical evaluation problem. Even when controlled experiments are not a viable option, appropriate approaches might succeed where traditional empirical strategies fail to uncover the effects of environmental interventions.

[1]  C. Schmidt,et al.  Knowing What Works: The Case for Rigorous Program Evaluation , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  J. D. Khazzoom Energy Saving Resulting from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances , 1987 .

[3]  J. D. Khazzoom,et al.  Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances , 1980 .

[4]  T. Shakespeare,et al.  Observational Studies , 2003 .

[5]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Randomization as an Instrumental Variable , 1995 .

[6]  A. B. Lovins,et al.  Saving gigabucks with negawatts , 1985 .

[7]  Analytics of demand-side conservation programs , 1989 .

[8]  Scott M. Fuess Union Bargaining Power: A View from Japan , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  A. Lovins Energy Saving from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances , 1988 .

[10]  Denzil G. Fiebig,et al.  Residential End-Use Electricity Demand: Results from a Designed Experiment , 2000 .

[11]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  What does a Negawatt Really Cost , 1991 .

[12]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs , 1992 .

[13]  J. D. Khazzoom,et al.  Energy Savings from More Efficient Appliances: A Rejoinder , 1989 .

[14]  M. Binswanger Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? , 2001 .

[15]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs , 1999 .

[16]  J. Eto,et al.  The Total Cost and Measured Performance of Utility-Sponsored Energy Efficiency Programs , 1996 .

[17]  D. Rubin Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[18]  Franz Wirl,et al.  Lessons from Ltility Conservation Programs , 2000 .

[19]  J. Eto,et al.  Where Did the Money Go? The Cost and Performance of the Largest Commercial Sector DSM Programs , 2000 .

[20]  R. Hartman,et al.  SELF-SELECTION BIAS IN THE EVALUATION OF VOLUNTARY ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAMS , 1988 .

[21]  Marvin J. Horowitz,et al.  Economic Indicators of Market Transformation: Energy Efficient Lighting and EPA's Green Lights , 2001 .

[22]  Franz Wirl,et al.  The Economics of Conservation Programs , 1997 .

[23]  J. Angrist,et al.  Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics , 1998 .