The Influence of Social Networks on Agricultural Technology Adoption

Abstract This paper applies Social Network Analysis (SNA) to the effects of professional collaboration within social networks on farmers’ decision-making behavior when adopting irrigation technology. This paper addresses professional collaboration found in tenure relations, social and professional organizations. The sample consists of 195 fields farmed over a five-year period in southeast Texas by 37 farmers. The analysis suggests that participation in organizations is a key factor influencing adoption of irrigation technology. After initial implementation by central farmers, technology is transferred either through tenant or kinship relationships. Results suggest that ownership-stake is a factor as to whether a farmer participates in organizations.

[1]  M. Agarwal,et al.  Effect of field levelling quality on irrigation efficiency and crop yield , 1981 .

[2]  D. Harvey.  Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography , 2001 .

[3]  Gregory Wozniak.  Joint information acquisition and new technology adoption: Late versus early adoption , 1993 .

[4]  G. Feder,et al.  The Role of Public Policy in the Diffusion of Improved Agricultural Technology , 1985 .

[5]  E. D. Vories,et al.  Water use estimates for various rice production systems in Mississippi and Arkansas , 2006, Irrigation Science.

[6]  Gershon Feder,et al.  The Acquisition of Information and the Adoption of New Technology , 1984 .

[7]  T. Howell.  Enhancing Water Use Efficiency in Irrigated Agriculture , 2001 .

[8]  Manuel Pulido-Velazquez,et al.  Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  R. Huffaker,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of Economic Incentive Policies Encouraging Agricultural Water Conservation , 2003 .

[10]  Henning Bjornlund,et al.  The adoption of improved irrigation technology and management practices--A study of two irrigation districts in Alberta, Canada , 2009 .

[11]  C. Prell.  Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology , 2011 .

[12]  Herman Bouwer,et al.  Integrated Water Management for the 21st Century: Problems and Solutions , 2002 .

[13]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[14]  Douglas Jackson-Smith,et al.  The Dynamics of Agricultural Biotechnology Adoption: Lessons from series rBST Use in Wisconsin, 1994–2001 , 2004 .

[15]  Cheryl R. Doss,et al.  Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement , 2006 .

[16]  Gershon Feder,et al.  The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review , 1993 .

[17]  Charles M. Burt,et al.  Accuracy of Irrigation Efficiency Estimates , 1997 .

[18]  Gershon Feder,et al.  Farm size, risk aversion, and the adoption of new technology under uncertainty. , 1980 .

[19]  Luis S. Pereira,et al.  Research Agenda on Sustainability of Irrigated Agriculture , 1996 .

[20]  A. Admassie,et al.  The role of education on the adoption of chemical fertiliser under different socioeconomic environments in Ethiopia , 2004 .

[21]  Brenda P. Turner,et al.  Agriculture to Instream Water Transfers under Uncertain Water Availability: A Case Study of the Deschutes River, Oregon , 1997 .

[22]  David P. Anderson,et al.  The Adoption And Diffusion Of Level Fields And Basins , 1999 .