Looking for trouble: A multilevel analysis of disagreeable contacts in online social networks

Identifying characteristics of troublemakers in online social networks, those contacts who violate norms via disagreeable or unsociable behaviour, is vital for supporting preventative strategies for undesirable, psychologically damaging online interactions. To date characterising troublemakers has relied on self-reports focused on the network holder, largely overlooking the role of network friends. In the present study, information was obtained on 5113 network contacts from 52 UK-based Facebook users (age range 1345; 75% female) using digitally derived data and in-depth network surveys. Participants rated their contacts in terms of online disagreement, relational closeness and interaction patterns. Characteristics of online troublemakers were explored using binary logistic multilevel analysis. Instances of online disagreement were most apparent in the networks of emerging adults (1921 years). Contacts were more likely to be identified as online troublemakers if they were well connected within the network. Rates of offline and Facebook exchanges interacted such that contacts known well offline but with low rates of Facebook communication were more likely to be identified as troublemakers. This may indicate that users were harbouring known troublemakers in a bid to preserve offline relationships and reputational status. Implications are discussed in terms of an individual's susceptibility to undesirable encounters online. Identifies characteristics of troublemakers in online social networks.Combines self-report data with real-world digital characteristics.Multilevel analysis of 5113 network contacts from 52 UK-based Facebook users.Online disagreement most apparent on the networks of young adults.Troublemakers show a tendency to be well connected individuals.

[1]  Bryn Alexander Coles,et al.  Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Sameer Kumar.  Review of: Hansen, Derek, Shneiderman, Ben, and Smith, Marc A. Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: insights from a connected world. Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann, 2010 , 2011, Inf. Res..

[3]  William J Browne,et al.  MCMC Estimation in MLwiN (Version 2.13) Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol , 2009 .

[4]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL , 2009, C&T.

[5]  Heidi Vandebosch,et al.  Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims , 2009, New Media Soc..

[6]  G. A. Marcoulides.  Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[7]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Partitioning variation in multilevel models , 2002 .

[8]  Natsui Takato.  Cloud Computing Service and Legal Issues , 2010 .

[9]  E. Lemerise,et al.  Varieties of Childhood Bullying: Values, Emotion Processes, and Social Competence , 2001 .

[10]  Heidi Vandebosch,et al.  Dark Triad personality traits and adolescent cyber-aggression , 2015 .

[11]  Lee A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Direct and indirect aggression tactics as a function of domain-specific self-esteem , 2016 .

[12]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  Negative emotional and cognitive responses to being unfriended on Facebook: An exploratory study , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Bernhard Rieder,et al.  Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application , 2013, WebSci.

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Social network analysis: Measuring, mapping, and modeling collections of connections , 2020, Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL.

[15]  A. Sengupta,et al.  Are Social Networking Sites a Source of Online Harassment for Teens? Evidence from Survey Data , 2008 .

[16]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use , 2014, CHI.

[17]  T. Snijders,et al.  The Use of Multilevel Modeling for Analysing Personal Networks: Networks of Cocaine Users in an Urban Area. , 1995 .

[18]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Does the use of social networking sites increase children's risk of harm? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Jessica Vitak.  The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures , 2012 .

[20]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[21]  C. McCarty,et al.  Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size , 2001 .

[22]  Vladimir Stantchev,et al.  Cloud computing service for knowledge assessment and studies recommendation in crowdsourcing and collaborative learning environments based on social network analysis , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  William J. Browne,et al.  A User's Guide To Mlwin , 2015 .

[24]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Assessing structural correlates to social capital in Facebook ego networks , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[25]  K. Mitchell,et al.  Online Harassment in Context: Trends From Three Youth Internet Safety Surveys (2000, 2005, 2010) , 2013 .

[26]  Jose María Álvarez Rodríguez,et al.  Skillrank: Towards a Hybrid Method to Assess Quality and Confidence of Professional Skills in Social Networks , 2015, Sci. Program..

[27]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  Being unfriended on Facebook: An application of Expectancy Violation Theory , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites , 2011 .

[29]  Constantinos M. Kokkinos,et al.  Prevalence and personality correlates of Facebook bullying among university undergraduates , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  M. Pujazon-Zazik,et al.  To Tweet, or Not to Tweet: Gender Differences and Potential Positive and Negative Health Outcomes of Adolescents’ Social Internet Use , 2010, American journal of men's health.

[31]  Jesse Fox,et al.  The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  William J. Browne,et al.  MCMC Estimation in MlwiN , 2002 .

[33]  Jean Underwood,et al.  When 'friends' collide: Social heterogeneity and user vulnerability on social network sites , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Andrew Howes,et al.  HARMONY AND TENSION ON SOCIAL NETWORK SITES , 2012 .

[35]  Tom A. B. Snijders.  Power and Sample Size in Multilevel Linear Models , 2005 .

[36]  Tolga Aricak,et al.  Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Introducing Multilevel Modeling , 1998 .

[38]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Marika Lüders,et al.  Too Many Facebook “Friends”? Content Sharing and Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[40]  R I M Dunbar,et al.  Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[41]  Andrea Passarella,et al.  Egocentric online social networks: Analysis of key features and prediction of tie strength in Facebook , 2013, Comput. Commun..

[42]  Jessica Vitak,et al.  Norm evolution and violation on Facebook , 2012, New Media Soc..

[43]  Remedios González,et al.  Predicting bullying: maladjustment, social skills and popularity , 2012 .

[44]  J. Burgoon.  Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication , 1993 .

[45]  J. Wolak,et al.  Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[46]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization , 2008 .

[47]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on my Facebook Wall: Effects of Exposure to Facebook on Self-Esteem , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[48]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45:7 (2004), pp 1308–1316 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics , 2022 .

[49]  Bernhard Debatin,et al.  Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[50]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[51]  P. Best,et al.  I’ve 500 friends, but who are my mates?’: Investigating the influence of online friend networks on adolescent wellbeing , 2015 .

[52]  Marko M. Skoric,et al.  Facebook bullying: An extension of battles in school , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  Julia Davidson,et al.  EXPLORING YOUNG PEOPLE'S USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES AND DIGITAL MEDIA IN THE INTERNET SAFETY CONTEXT , 2013 .

[54]  Tracy Vaillancourt,et al.  Adolescent Bullying, Dating, and Mating , 2015 .

[55]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[56]  Bernie Hogan,et al.  Analysing Social Networks Via the Internet , 2007 .