The paradox of self‐management: individual and group autonomy in work groups

This study explores how autonomy at the individual and the group levels directly affect group cohesiveness, and how they indirectly influence group effectiveness. Hypotheses suggesting that individual and group autonomy will be oppositely related to cohesiveness are supported in data collected from a large sample of work groups in two separate organizations. Also supported are hypotheses suggesting a group cohesiveness/group performance orientation interaction as a mediator of the relationships between autonomy at both levels and group effectiveness. The findings highlight the importance of considering autonomy at both individual and group levels simultaneously when designing work groups that incorporate autonomy. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[2]  Claus W. Langfred.  Is Group Cohesiveness a Double-Edged Sword? , 1998 .

[3]  M. Shanley,et al.  The Importance of Organizational Context, II: An Empirical Test of Work Group Cohesiveness and Effectiveness in Two Governmental Bureaucracies , 1998 .

[4]  Mark Shanley,et al.  The Importance of Organizational Context, I: A Conceptual Model of Cohesiveness and Ineffectiveness in Work Groups , 1997 .

[5]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[6]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Impact of Work Teams on Manufacturing Performance: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996 .

[7]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1996 .

[8]  Dexter Dunphy,et al.  Teams: Panaceas or Prescriptions for Improved Performance? , 1996 .

[9]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Ina S. Markham,et al.  Self-management and self-leadership reexamined: A levels-of-analysis perspective , 1995 .

[11]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Leadership for Self-Managing Work Teams: A Typology and Integrative Model , 1995 .

[12]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[13]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Creating high performance organizations : practices and results of employee involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 companies , 1995 .

[14]  J. Moody,et al.  Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance , 1994 .

[15]  E. F. Stone-Romero,et al.  Relative power of moderated multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup correlation coefficients for detecting moderating effects. , 1994 .

[16]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[17]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-Experiment , 1994 .

[18]  Eileen Appelbaum,et al.  The New American Workplace , 1993 .

[19]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[20]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[21]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Organizational behavior: linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[23]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making☆ , 1992 .

[24]  C. R. Evans,et al.  On Cohesiveness , 1992 .

[25]  Joann Keyton.  Comment on Evans and Dion , 1992 .

[26]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  On the application of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect really group-based phenomena? , 1992 .

[27]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[28]  John Cordery,et al.  Attitudinal and Behavioral Effects of Autonomous Group Working: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1991 .

[29]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[30]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[31]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[32]  G. R. Bushe,et al.  Contextual and Internal Variables Affecting Task Group Outcomes in Organizations , 1989 .

[33]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look , 1989 .

[34]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[35]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Group Size, Leadership Behavior, and Subordinate Satisfaction , 1989 .

[36]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[37]  E. Deci,et al.  The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  The Design and Activation of Self-Regulating Work Groups , 1987 .

[39]  Emin Babakus,et al.  The Sensitivity of Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis to Violations of Measurement Scale and Distributional Assumptions , 1987 .

[40]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Social Information Processing and Group-Induced Shifts in Responses to Task Design , 1987 .

[41]  Paul E. Spector.  Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work , 1986 .

[42]  J. Hackman,et al.  The psychology of self-management in organizations , 1986 .

[43]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  R. Noe,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Job Characteristics to Job Satisfaction , 1985 .

[45]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[46]  D. C. Feldman,et al.  The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms , 1984 .

[47]  H. Tajfel.  Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[48]  Eli P. Cox,et al.  The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review. , 1980 .

[49]  Anne Locksley,et al.  Social categorization and discriminatory behavior: Extinguishing the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. , 1980 .

[50]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Social categorization and memory for in-group and out-group behavior. , 1980 .

[51]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[52]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Grover C. Mathewson,et al.  The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication , 1966 .