Responses to Pop-Out Stimuli in the Barn Owl's Optic Tectum Can Emerge through Stimulus-Specific Adaptation

Here, we studied neural correlates of orientation-contrast-based saliency in the optic tectum (OT) of barn owls. Neural responses in the intermediate/deep layers of the OT were recorded from lightly anesthetized owls confronted with arrays of bars in which one bar (the target) was orthogonal to the remaining bars (the distractors). Responses to target bars were compared with responses to distractor bars in the receptive field (RF). Initially, no orientation-contrast sensitivity was observed. However, if the position of the target bar in the array was randomly shuffled across trials so that it occasionally appeared in the RF, then such sensitivity emerged. The effect started to become significant after three or four positional changes of the target bar and strengthened with additional trials. Our data further suggest that this effect arises due to specific adaptation to the stimulus in the RF combined with suppression from the surround. By jittering the position of the bar inside the RF across trials, we demonstrate that the adaptation has two components, one position specific and one orientation specific. The findings give rise to the hypothesis that barn owls, by active scanning of the scene, can induce adaptation of the tectal circuitry to the common orientation and thus achieve a “pop-out” of rare orientations. Such a model is consistent with several behavioral observations in owls and may be relevant to other visual features and species. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Natural scenes are often characterized by a dominant orientation, such as the scenery of a pine forest or the sand dunes in a windy desert. Therefore, orientation that contrasts the regularity of the scene is perceived salient for many animals as a means to break camouflage. By actively moving the scene between each trial, we show here that neurons in the retinotopic map of the barn owl's optic tectum specifically adapt to the common orientation, giving rise to preferential representation of odd orientations. Based on this, we suggest a new mechanism for orientation-based camouflage breaking that links active scanning of scenes with neural adaptation. This mechanism may be relevant to pop-out in other species and visual features.

[1]  H. Nothdurft Latency effects in orientation popout , 2002, Vision Research.

[2]  Y. Gutfreund,et al.  Interactions between Stimulus-Specific Adaptation and Visual Auditory Integration in the Forebrain of the Barn Owl , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Miller,et al.  Habituation-like decrease in the responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the macaque , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Signaling of the Strongest Stimulus in the Owl Optic Tectum , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Global Inhibition and Stimulus Competition in the Owl Optic Tectum , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  A shared inhibitory circuit for both exogenous and endogenous control of stimulus selection , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  E. J. Woods,et al.  Adaptation and habituation characteristics of tectal neurons in the pigeon , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. , 1983, Science.

[9]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Direction of visual apparent motion driven by perceptual organization of cross-modal signals. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[11]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Higher set sizes in pop-out search displays do not eliminate priming or enhance target selection , 2013, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Segev,et al.  Orientation saliency without visual cortex and target selection in archer fish , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Visual-auditory integration for visual search: a behavioral study in barn owls , 2015, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[14]  I. Nelken,et al.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Israel Nelken Stimulus-specific adaptation and deviance detection in the auditory system: experiments and models , 2014, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  The redundant-signals paradigm and preattentive visual processing. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[19]  G. Boynton,et al.  Orientation-Specific Adaptation in Human Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[21]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Control from below: the role of a midbrain network in spatial attention , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Yoram Gutfreund,et al.  Multisensory enhancement in the optic tectum of the barn owl: spike count and spike timing. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Yuan Bo Peng,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex and pain processing , 2014, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[24]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation and visual salience. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[25]  Tsunehiro Takeda,et al.  Direction-specific adaptation of magnetic responses to motion onset , 2005, Vision Research.

[26]  Shreesh P Mysore,et al.  Flexible Categorization of Relative Stimulus Strength by the Optic Tectum , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Movshon,et al.  Pattern adaptation and cross-orientation interactions in the primary visual cortex , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[28]  T. Poggio,et al.  What and where: A Bayesian inference theory of attention , 2010, Vision Research.

[29]  Y. Gutfreund,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptations in the Gaze Control System of the Barn Owl , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Matthew de Brecht,et al.  A neural network implementation of a saliency map model , 2006, Neural Networks.

[31]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Depth generalization from stereo to motion parallax in the owl , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  Ohad Ben-Shahar,et al.  Overt attention toward oriented objects in free-viewing barn owls , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Annelies Baeck,et al.  Transfer of object learning across distinct visual learning paradigms. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[34]  R. Wessel,et al.  Recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates competitive stimulus selection in an attention network. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Shreesh P Mysore,et al.  The role of a midbrain network in competitive stimulus selection , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  Y. Gutfreund,et al.  Saliency mapping in the optic tectum and its relationship to habituation , 2014, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[37]  Shay Ohayon,et al.  Multiple manifestations of microstimulation in the optic tectum: eye movements, pupil dilations, and sensory priming. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Ohad Ben-Shahar,et al.  Visual pop-out in barn owls: Human-like behavior in the avian brain. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[39]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Neurons selective for orientation and binocular disparity in the visual Wulst of the barn owl (Tyto alba). , 1976, Science.

[40]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[41]  J. Wolfe Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli , 1994, Vision Research.

[42]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[43]  István Czigler,et al.  Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[44]  D. Munoz,et al.  On the importance of the transient visual response in the superior colliculus , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[45]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye movements in natural behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  S. Solomon,et al.  Moving Sensory Adaptation beyond Suppressive Effects in Single Neurons , 2014, Current Biology.

[47]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  On the barn owl’s visual pre-attack behavior: I. Structure of head movements and motion patterns , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[48]  Adam Kohn,et al.  Adaptation improves performance on a visual search task. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[49]  Jerome Baron,et al.  Directional responses of visual wulst neurones to grating and plaid patterns in the awake owl , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[50]  H. Nothdurft Salience from feature contrast: variations with texture density , 2000, Vision Research.

[51]  R. Desimone,et al.  Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. , 1994, Science.

[52]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[53]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[54]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity and its importance in visual cognitive sciences , 2011, Neuroreport.

[55]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[56]  E. Knudsen Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[57]  M Stemmler,et al.  Lateral interactions in primary visual cortex: a model bridging physiology and psychophysics. , 1995, Science.

[58]  R M Douglas,et al.  Position-specific adaptation in simple cell receptive fields of the cat striate cortex. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  B. Tatler,et al.  Yarbus, eye movements, and vision , 2010, i-Perception.

[60]  Y. Gutfreund,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptation: Can It Be a Neural Correlate of Behavioral Habituation? , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  Kelly Shen,et al.  Investigating the role of the superior colliculus in active vision with the visual search paradigm , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[63]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[64]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Visual search: a retrospective. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[66]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Seeing grating-textured surface begins at the border. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[67]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  Through a barn owl’s eyes: interactions between scene content and visual attention , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[68]  D. Mumford,et al.  Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[69]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[70]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl , 2012, PloS one.