A Strategic Governance Review for Multi-Organizational Systems of Education, Training, and Professional Development

Abstract : As one of the largest employers in the country, the Department of Defense (DoD) seeks to maintain a high-quality civilian workforce in the face of shifting organizational priorities as well as technological and social changes. Like most employers, DoD offers its employees opportunities for education, training, and professional development (ET&D) through both DoD and non-DoD providers. This network of ET&D providers and users constitutes a multi-organizational, multi-stakeholder system that is at present loosely coordinated and incompletely understood. Because of the division of financial responsibility, command authority, and workforce planning within DoD, the effectiveness of the system depends on its capacity for governance of the organizations that provide the ET&D needed. At the request of the DoD Office of the Chancellor for Education and Professional Development, RAND undertook a study to develop tools for describing and evaluating external governance in such a multi-organizational system of ET&D. This report describes an approach for accomplishing those aims. The approach described here consists of two major tasks: a structural analysis that maps governance arrangements and an implementation audit that assesses effectiveness based on operational evidence. The framework and taxonomy presented here were developed based on reviews of relevant literature and limited mapping exercises, but not through field audits or assessment exercises with organizations. The authors recommend pilot testing of the approach on a limited scale before systemwide implementation. (5 figures, 52 refs.)

[1]  Charles Cannon,et al.  Characterizing the Future Defense Workforce , 2001 .

[2]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Organizational Performance and Measurement in the Public Sector: Toward Service, Effort and Accomplishment Reporting , 1996 .

[3]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[4]  Tora K. Bikson,et al.  Ensuring the Quality and Productivity of Education and Professional Development Activities: A Review of Approaches and Lessons for DoD , 2001 .

[5]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[6]  A. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States , 1971 .

[7]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[8]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[9]  Dina G. Levy,et al.  Strategic Assessment and Development of Interorganizational Influence in the Absence of Hierarchical Authority , 2003 .

[10]  Sheila Nataraj Kirby,et al.  A Casebook Of Alternative Governance Structures And Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[11]  Brian Gill The Governance of the City University of New York: A System at Odds with Itself , 2000 .

[12]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[13]  W. Mason Creating the Corporate Future , 1982 .

[14]  E. Sam Overman,et al.  Information for Control: Another Management Proverb? , 1994 .

[15]  Kevin P. Kearns,et al.  The Strategic Management of Accountability in Nonprofit Organizations: An Analytical Framework , 1994 .

[16]  Grant T. Savage,et al.  Governance of Integrated Delivery Systems/Networks: A Stakeholder Approach , 1997, Health care management review.

[17]  B. J. Reed,et al.  New Public Management and Substantive Democracy , 2001 .

[18]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Delivering quality service : balancing customer perceptions and expectations , 1990 .

[19]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[20]  C. Achilles,et al.  Evaluation: A Systematic Approach , 1980 .

[21]  R. Brugha,et al.  Stakeholder analysis: a review. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[22]  R. Moe The Emerging Federal Quasi Government: Issues of Management and Accountability , 2001 .

[23]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[24]  C. Oliver,et al.  Organizations Working Together , 1992 .

[25]  Jürgen Beyer,et al.  Jeffrey Pfeffer and Gerald R. Salancik: The External Control of Organizations : A Resource Dependence Perspective , 2000 .

[26]  Monitoring Government: Inspectors General and the Search for Accountability , 1993 .

[27]  Karl M. Wiig,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  Bob E. Hayes,et al.  Measuring customer satisfaction : survey design, use, and statistical analysis methods , 1997 .

[29]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[30]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[31]  James A. Dewar,et al.  Strategic and Performance Planning for the Office of the Chancellor for Education and Professional Development in the Department of Defense , 2001 .

[32]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Applying Stakeholder Theory to e-Government - Benefits and Limits , 2001, I3E.

[33]  T. Levitt,et al.  The Marketing Imagination , 1983 .

[34]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  Rethinking Democratic Accountability , 2001 .

[35]  Donald Chisholm,et al.  Coordination Without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems , 1992 .

[36]  The New Public Service , 1999 .

[37]  B. Peters,et al.  The Tides of Reform: Making Government Work, 1945–1995 by Paul C. Light , 1998 .

[38]  W. Dugger Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond , 1991 .

[39]  A. Paulus,et al.  A sociological systems theory of interorganizational network development in health and social care , 2001 .

[40]  Leon H. Mayhew The new public , 1997 .

[41]  Carol H. Weiss Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness , 1972 .

[42]  James F. Wilson Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It , 1990 .

[43]  M. Wart The First Step in the Reinvention Process: Assessment , 1995 .

[44]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[45]  G. Kreweras Creating the corporate future: Russell L. ACKOFF Wiley, New York, 1981, xi + 297 pages, £10.85 , 1982 .