Generating Novel Options during Systems Architecting: Psychological Principles, Systems Thinking, and Computer‐Based Aiding

Systems Architecting is a decision-intensive process that stands to benefit from access to historical architectural options and the ability to rapidly generate novel ones. Despite this recognition, option generation, and, more precisely, the process of creative option generation has been underemphasized in both the decision making and system architecting literature. This paper reviews the literature on option generation from the perspective of systems architecting. It presents a framework for option generation that exploits systems thinking and psychological principles for stimulating creative option generation. It presents the system concept of an option generation aiding system that can assist systems architects in expanding and systematically exploring the option space in the early stages of architecting and design when cost avoidance is more easily achieved and change is possible.

[1]  A. Mark Williams,et al.  Skill-based differences in option generation in a complex task: a verbal protocol analysis , 2011, Cognitive Processing.

[2]  Eberhardt Rechtin Systems Architecting: Creating & Building Complex Systems , 1990 .

[3]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Take The First: Option-generation and resulting choices , 2003 .

[4]  Caroline E. Zsambok,et al.  Characteristics of Skilled Option Generation in Chess , 1995 .

[5]  Gary A. Klein,et al.  The role of leverage points in option generation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[6]  Richard M. Tong,et al.  On the Generation of Alternatives in Decision Analysis Problems , 1982 .

[7]  Joanna L. Y. Ho,et al.  Decision problem structuring: generating options , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .

[9]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[10]  G. Pitz,et al.  Procedures for eliciting choices in the analysis of individual decisions , 1980 .

[11]  R. Neufville Real Options: Dealing With Uncertainty in Systems Planning and Design , 2003 .

[12]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. , 1978 .

[13]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Calibrating databases , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Pustaka Utama,et al.  Adams, J.L. (2001) Conceptual Blockbusting: A Guide to Better Ideas. Perseus , 2007 .

[15]  Murat M. Tanik,et al.  Validation of Interface System Architecture , 2007, Trans. SDPS.

[16]  Tao Wang,et al.  Real Options "in" Projects and Systems Design: Identification of Options and Solution for Path Dependency , 2008 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[18]  C. Gettys,et al.  Hypothesis plausibility and hypothesis generation , 1979 .

[19]  Paul Ward,et al.  Option Generation and Decision Making in Critical-Care Nursing , 2010 .

[20]  Eberhardt Rechtin Systems Architecting of Organizations: Why Eagles Can't Swim , 1999 .