Randomized, Controlled Dose-Ranging Study of the Selective Adenosine A2A Receptor Agonist Binodenoson for Pharmacological Stress as an Adjunct to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Background—Dipyridamole and adenosine cause frequent side effects as a result of nonspecific adenosine receptor stimulation. Selective agonism of the adenosine A2A receptor should result in a similar degree of coronary vasodilation (and thus similar perfusion images) with fewer side effects. Methods and Results—In a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, 2-arm crossover trial, 240 patients underwent 2 single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging studies in random order, first after pharmacological stress with adenosine and a second study with the selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist binodenoson, using 1 of 4 dosing regimens. Safety, tolerability, and SPECT image concordance between the 2 agents were examined. Exact categorical agreement in the extent and severity of reversible perfusion defects ranged from 79% to 87%, with kappa values from 0.69 to 0.85, indicating very good to excellent agreement between binodenoson and adenosine. The risk of any safety event/side effect was significantly lower with any dose of binodenoson than with adenosine (P ≤0.01) because of a dose-related reduction in subjective side effects, as objective events were infrequent. There was a reduction in the severity of chest pain, dyspnea, and flushing in all binodenoson doses compared with adenosine (P <0.01), and the magnitude of severity reduction was dose-related. Conclusions—The selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist binodenoson results in an extent and severity of reversible perfusion defects on SPECT imaging similar to nonselective adenosine receptor stimulation, accompanied by a dose-related reduction in the incidence and severity of side effects.

[1]  S. Port Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures , 1999 .

[2]  L. Johnson,et al.  OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY IMAGING GUIDELINES FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES Part 2 , 1999 .

[3]  Robert Barrett,et al.  Pharmacology and toxicology of the A2A‐adenosine receptor agonist 2‐ [(cyclohexylmethylene)hydrazino]adenosine (MRE‐0470) in the rat , 1997 .

[4]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Circulation.

[5]  J. Linden,et al.  Pharmacology of 2‐cyclohexylmethylidenehydrazinoadenosine (WRC‐0470), a novel, short‐acting adenosine A2A receptor agonist that produces selective coronary vasodilation , 1997 .

[6]  D. Mark,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  J. Y. Yang,et al.  Pharmacological stress thallium scintigraphy with 2-cyclohexylmethylidenehydrazinoadenosine (WRC-0470). A novel, short-acting adenosine A2A receptor agonist. , 1996, Circulation.

[8]  J. Hill,et al.  Selective attenuation by N-0861 (N6-endonorboran-2-yl-9-methyladenine) of cardiac A1 adenosine receptor-mediated effects in humans. , 1996, Circulation.

[9]  J. Leppo,et al.  Safety of dipyridamole testing in 73,806 patients: The Multicenter Dipyridamole Safety Study , 1995, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  L. Cyr,et al.  Measures of clinical agreement for nominal and categorical data: the kappa coefficient. , 1992, Computers in biology and medicine.

[12]  長南達也 Visual analog scale , 1992 .

[13]  M. Kern,et al.  Intravenous adenosine: continuous infusion and low dose bolus administration for determination of coronary vasodilator reserve in patients with and without coronary artery disease. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Winniford,et al.  Comparison of coronary vasodilation with intravenous dipyridamole and adenosine. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Verani Adenosine thallium 201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. , 1991, American heart journal.

[16]  R. Wilson,et al.  Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. , 1990, Circulation.

[17]  A. Sinusas,et al.  Experimental studies of the physiologic properties of technetium-99m isonitriles. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  A Ranhosky,et al.  The safety of intravenous dipyridamole thallium myocardial perfusion imaging. Intravenous Dipyridamole Thallium Imaging Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[19]  R. Berne,et al.  The cardiac effects of adenosine. , 1989, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[20]  J. Zielonka,et al.  Effect of maintenance oral theophylline on dipyridamole-thallium-201 myocardial imaging using SPECT and dipyridamole-induced hemodynamic changes. , 1988, American heart journal.

[21]  Ronald Melzack,et al.  Pain Measurement and Assessment , 1983 .

[22]  W. Nichols,et al.  Acute Effect of Intravenous Dipyridamole on Regional Coronary Hemodynamics and Metabolism , 1981, Circulation.

[23]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. III. Clinical trial. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  K. Gould,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. I. Physiologic basis and experimental validation. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  R. Westcott,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. II. Clinical methodology and feasibility. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.