Selective invocation of shape priors for deformable segmentation and morphologic classification of prostate cancer tissue microarrays

Shape based active contours have emerged as a natural solution to overlap resolution. However, most of these shape-based methods are computationally expensive. There are instances in an image where no overlapping objects are present and applying these schemes results in significant computational overhead without any accompanying, additional benefit. In this paper we present a novel adaptive active contour scheme (AdACM) that combines boundary and region based energy terms with a shape prior in a multi level set formulation. To reduce the computational overhead, the shape prior term in the variational formulation is only invoked for those instances in the image where overlaps between objects are identified; these overlaps being identified via a contour concavity detection scheme. By not having to invoke all three terms (shape, boundary, region) for segmenting every object in the scene, the computational expense of the integrated active contour model is dramatically reduced, a particularly relevant consideration when multiple objects have to be segmented on very large histopathological images. The AdACM was employed for the task of segmenting nuclei on 80 prostate cancer tissue microarray images from 40 patient studies. Nuclear shape based, architectural and textural features extracted from these segmentations were extracted and found to able to discriminate different Gleason grade patterns with a classification accuracy of 86% via a quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) classifier. On average the AdACM model provided 60% savings in computational times compared to a non-optimized hybrid active contour model involving a shape prior.

[1]  James Diamond,et al.  The use of morphological characteristics and texture analysis in the identification of tissue composition in prostatic neoplasia. , 2004, Human pathology.

[2]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  John R. Gilbertson,et al.  Computer aided diagnostic tools aim to empower rather than replace pathologists: Lessons learned from computational chess , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[4]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[5]  Robert Pless,et al.  Segmenting Multiple Familiar Objects Under Mutual Occlusion , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[7]  L. Egevad,et al.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[8]  Bahram Parvin,et al.  Multireference Level Set for the Characterization of Nuclear Morphology in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  A. Madabhushi Digital pathology image analysis: opportunities and challenges. , 2009, Imaging in medicine.

[10]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Cell Image Segmentation with Kernel-Based Dynamic Clustering and an Ellipsoidal Cell Shape Model , 2001, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[12]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Shape Priors for Level Set Representations , 2002, ECCV.

[13]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  An Integrated Region-, Boundary-, Shape-Based Active Contour for Multiple Object Overlap Resolution in Histological Imagery , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  P. Walsh,et al.  Clinical and cost impact of second-opinion pathology. Review of prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy. , 1996, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[16]  Po-Whei Huang,et al.  Automatic Classification for Pathological Prostate Images Based on Fractal Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Euripides G. M. Petrakis,et al.  Matching and Retrieval of Distorted and Occluded Shapes Using Dynamic Programming , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Multifeature Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review , 2009, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  Robert W Veltri,et al.  Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: A prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow‐up after radical prostatectomy , 2010, The Prostate.

[22]  Wei Wang,et al.  A flexible and robust approach for segmenting cell nuclei from 2D microscopy images using supervised learning and template matching , 2013, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[23]  R. A. Zoroofi,et al.  An image analysis approach for automatic malignancy determination of prostate pathological images , 2007, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[24]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Unifying boundary and region-based information for geodesic active tracking , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[25]  Xavier Bresson,et al.  A priori information in image segmentation: energy functional based on shape statistical model and image information , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[26]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Level set based shape prior segmentation , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[27]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[28]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[29]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Towards robust and effective shape modeling: Sparse shape composition , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[30]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  AUTOMATED GRADING OF PROSTATE CANCER USING ARCHITECTURAL AND TEXTURAL IMAGE FEATURES , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.